Clinical Trials Logo

Respiratory Distress Syndrome clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT04274296 Completed - ARDS, Human Clinical Trials

Advisory Lead ARDS Respirator Management

ALARM
Start date: September 1, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

A advisory will be activated in the ICUs patient data management system. The trial will be conducted as observational cohort trial. During the first six month all patients with a LIPS ≥ 4 will be included in the control group. No change of care is needed. In a second phase during the next six months, all patients with a LIPS ≥ 4 will be included into the advisory group where advisories will be shown in the patient data management system. To create this advisory, a clinical advisory rule is executed every 4 hours and the appropriate advisory text is calculated. If the defined threshold values (driving pressure ≥ 15mbar) are reached, then the advisory displays a recommendation to rethink the patient's ventilation strategy. Furthermore, permissive hypercapnia and oxygen saturating limits considered as safe will be given. (paCO2: 55mmHg, pH: 7.25, paO2: 80 mmHg, SaO2: 92%)

NCT ID: NCT04247477 Completed - Acute Lung Injury Clinical Trials

Comparison of Different PEEP Titration Strategies Using Electrical Impedance Tomography in Patients With ARDS

DELTA
Start date: September 22, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The aim of the this study is to assess the short term physiological effects of 3 ventilation strategies for adult patients with ARDS admitted to intensive care unit. Two of those strategies are based on electrical impedance tomography (EIT) monitoring.

NCT ID: NCT04244890 Completed - Infant, Newborn Clinical Trials

Feasibility of Uninterrupted Infant Respiratory Support Treatment

FUIRST
Start date: February 21, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Feasibility study of a simplified respiratory support system for newborn infants

NCT ID: NCT04241874 Completed - Clinical trials for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

PEEP and Spontaneous Breathing During ARDS

EARDS
Start date: May 1, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Prospective, physiological study to systematically assess the effects of high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with and without inspiratory synchronization in patients with moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) exhibiting intense inspiratory effort while on assisted ventilation.

NCT ID: NCT04184674 Completed - Clinical trials for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Impact of the Transpulmonary Pressure on Right Ventricle Function in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

VD-SDRA
Start date: June 11, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Pulmonary distension induced by mechanical ventilation physiologically alters right ventricle pre and after-load, hence might lead to right ventricle failure. The hypothesis is that in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, the occurence of a right ventricle failure under lung protective ventilation might : i) be correlated to the transpulmonary pressure level, ii) lead to global heart failure, iii) and extremely result in poor outcome and death. The primary objective is to test the impact of transpulmonary pressure on right ventricular function in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in adults and children. Secondary objectives are : i) to compare thresholds of transpulmonary pressure associated with right ventricle failure between children and adults. ii) to assess if there is an association between transpulmonary pressure and morbidity and mortality. - For pediatric patients, a specific monitoring with electrical impedance tomography (EIT) will allow: - To assess if the transpulmonary pressure is associated with the level of regional pulmonary overdistention (or collapse) on electrical impedance tomography.(EIT) - To assess if there is an association between the occurrence of right ventricular failure, and distribution of ventilation on EIT.

NCT ID: NCT04156438 Completed - Clinical trials for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Airway Pressure Release Ventilation for Moderate-to-severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

EARL
Start date: June 29, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study will examine the feasibility of a large clinical trial investigating the effectiveness of airway pressure release ventilation and low tidal volume ventilation for patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.

NCT ID: NCT04115709 Completed - Clinical trials for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Decision Support System to Evaluate VENTilation in ARDS

DeVENT
Start date: March 19, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) residing in the intensive care unit (ICU) often require support for their breathing from a mechanical ventilator to provide adequate gas exchange, and although it is life-saving in this setting, it is also known to contribute to the morbidity and mortality in the condition. Mechanical ventilation delivers a volume and pressure of gas for each breath and can vary oxygen levels. Selecting the correct oxygen, pressure and volume levels is important, as incorrect levels can harm the patient, and result in an increased time connected to the ventilator. Recently, a system has been developed (the Beacon Caresystem) which advises the healthcare practitioner by the bedside as to how to best set the ventilator. This system is based on mathematics which describes the patients disease and may therefore provide ventilator settings which better suit the individual. The purpose of this study is to compare mechanical ventilation in ARDS patients following advice from the Beacon Caresystem to that of standard care to investigate whether the use of the system results in improved ventilation in all severities and phases of ARDS and thus reducing morbidity in ARDS. The investigators plan to recruit 110 patients (50 in the UK and 30 in each of the other 2 sites). The study also aims to examine the biological and physiological factors that determine the worsening of ARDS and the processes involved in recovery from ARDS with the aim to develop new therapies to help detect the condition and improve recovery. The investigators will utilise all raw data will be collected from the Beacon Caresystem to physiologically characterise the progression and resolution phases of ARDS. Additionally blood and Urine samples will be taken from healthy volunteers (100 in total) as a control comparison group for the biological analyses carried out in the DeVENT study.

NCT ID: NCT04106128 Completed - Clinical trials for Respiratory Distress Syndrome,Adult

Prevalence, Impact and Reversibility of Acute Diaprhagmatic Dysfunction in Acute Respiratory Detresse

PIRD-DRA
Start date: April 5, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The diaphragm is a fine striated muscle with both extra respiratory and respiratory functions. It does most of the breathing work in interaction with the accessory respiratory muscles, the rib cage and the abdomen. Its activity can be measured by the transdiaphragmatic pressure generated by the magnetic stimulation of phrenic nerves (gold standard). It has been shown in the literature that diaphragmatic ultrasound, via the measurement of diaphragmatic excursion and especially the thickening fraction, is an easily accessible, non-invasive, reproducible and relevant technique for evaluating acute diaphragmatic dysfunction in resuscitation patients. The objective of this project is to evaluate the prevalence of diaphragmatic dysfunction at admission in patients hospitalized in intensive care / respiratory intensive care unit for hypercapnic and/or hypoxic acute respiratory distress and requiring ventilatory support by non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen therapy. A subgroup analysis will then be carried out on 3 populations: - Hypercapnic exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - Hypoxic acute respiratory distress on infectious lung disease - Acute pulmonary edema

NCT ID: NCT04070053 Completed - Clinical trials for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Treatment of Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure and ARDS With Protection, Paralysis, and Proning (TheraPPP) Pathway

TheraPPP
Start date: August 23, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Treatment of patients with Hypoxemic respiratory failure (HRF) and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is complex. Therapies that have been shown to save the lives of patients with HRF and ARDS are available but they are not always provided. To reduce practice variation and improve adherence to evidence-informed therapies, the investigators developed the Treatment of Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure (HRF) and ARDS with Protection, Paralysis, and Proning (TheraPPP) Pathway. The purpose of this pilot study is to test the feasibility and acceptability of the TheraPPP Pathway. To assess feasibility, the investigators will test the ability to measure adherence to the pathway as well as patient and economic outcomes. To assess perceptions about the acceptability of the TheraPPP Pathway, the investigators will conduct a survey to clinicians who used the Pathway.

NCT ID: NCT04044976 Completed - Clinical trials for Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Caffeine Treatment in in the Delivery Room

CAFROOM
Start date: August 1, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Background. In recent years, particular attention has been paid to all interventions that could help reduce the need for mechanical ventilation MV and, therefore, the risk of BPD. However, early application of non-invasive respiratory supports and early treatment with surfactant fail in 45-50% of cases. Failure frequently depends on the onset of apnea episodes and, therefore, it has been proposed to treat very preterm infants with caffeine already in the delivery room in the first min of life. Hypothesis and objectives of the study. Our aim is to verify the hypothesis that it is possible to administer caffeine in the delivery room intravenously and enterally via an orogastric tube. Study design. Infants 25-29 weeks of gestational age will be enrolled and will be randomized to receive 20 mg/kg of caffeine citrate intravenously, via the umbilical vein, or enterally, through an orogastric tube, within 10 min of birth. The dosage of plasma caffeine concentration will be performed 60+15 min after administration to measure its peak and 60+15 min before the next dose (5 mg/kg/day i.v.). Endpoints. The primary endpoint will be the evaluation of the success rate of intravenous or enteral administration of caffeine in the delivery room. Secondary endpoints will be the evaluation of: number of infants in whom caffeine will be successfully administered by intravenous versus enteral route; number of infants where caffeine will be successfully administered that reached the therapeutic plasmatic range the first dose, confirming the success of the administration; comparison of caffeine blood level obtained with intravenous and enteral administration; frequency of successes in obtaining the therapeutic range after the second dose; frequency of MV within the first 72 hours of life in studied infants. Statistical analysis. In the absence of previous studies to use as a reference and this study being a feasibility study, it was decided arbitrarily to study 20 infants treated in the delivery room with caffeine administered intravenously and 20 infants treated in the delivery room with caffeine administered enterally. The clinical characteristics of the two groups will be described by calculating the mean value and the standard deviation or the rate and percentage. The primary endpoint will be evaluated by calculating the percentage of cases in which caffeine will be successfully administered. The comparison between the number of infants in which caffeine will be successfully administered intravenously versus the enteral route and the comparison between the caffeine plasma level obtained with intravenous and enteral administration will be performed using the Student "t" test for continuous parametric variables, the Wilcoxon rank sum test for non-parametric continuous variables and the χ2 test for categorical variables. A p <0.05 will be considered as statistically significant.