View clinical trials related to Acute Lung Injury.
Filter by:In 2023, the second Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference (PALICC-2) updated the diagnostic and management guidelines for Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (PARDS). The guidelines do not provide sufficient evidence-based recommendations on whether prone positioning ventilation is necessary for severe PARDS patients. However, the effectiveness of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) in treating severe PARDS has been fluctuating around 70% according to recent data from Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO). In 2018, the Randomized Evaluation of Sedation Titration for Respiratory Failure (RESTORE) study group conducted a retrospective analysis and concluded that ECMO does not significantly improve survival rates for severe PARDS. However, this retrospective study mainly focused on data from North America, with significant variations in annual ECMO support cases among different centers, which may introduce bias. With advancements in ECMO technology and materials, ECMO has become safer and easier to operate. In recent years, pediatric ECMO support technology has rapidly grown in mainland China and is increasingly being widely used domestically to rescue more children promptly. ECMO can also serve as a salvage measure for severely ARDS children who have failed conventional mechanical ventilation treatment. When optimizing ventilator parameters (titrating positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels, neuromuscular blockers, prone positioning), strict fluid management alone cannot maintain satisfactory oxygenation (P/F<80mmHg or Oxygen Index (OI) >40 for over 4 hours or OI >20 for over 24 hours), initiating ECMO can achieve lung-protective ventilation strategies with ultra-low tidal volumes to minimize ventilator-associated lung injury.
The study is a multicentric prospective randomised cross-over study. It evaluates the compatibility of patients with the device without altering the routine treatment applied. During this evaluation, either the clinician-adjusted values on the device or the standard pre-set values are used to obtain hourly and 30-minute PVA (Patient Ventilator Asynchrony) recordings. These recordings will be analysed offline to identify the settings used and to compare the hourly and 30-minute PVA (Patient Ventilator Asynchrony) values when synchronisation is automatically set. The relationships and differences between these values will be analysed. For this purpose, the IntelliSync+ option, already available on the device, will be used. This software continuously analyses waveform signals at least a hundred times per second. This allows for the immediate detection of patient efforts and the initiation of inspiration and expiration in real time, thereby replacing traditional trigger settings for inspiration and expiration. If the patient is already synchronised with this option, it will then be possible to switch to traditional synchronisation settings for comparison. Statistical analyses will be conducted using SPSS 24.0, JASP (Just Another Statistical Programme), Jamovi ( fork of JASP), or R software. Initially, all numerical and categorical data will be evaluated using descriptive statistical methods. The distributions of numerical variables will be examined using visual (histograms and probability plots) and analytical methods (Kolmogorov-Smirnov/Shapiro-Wilk tests). Mean/SD (standard deviation) or median/interquartile range (IQR) will be used as measures of distribution. For comparing numerical data that follows a normal distribution, the Student-t test will be used, and for non-normally distributed data, the Mann-Whitney U or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests will be employed. PVA (Patient Ventilator Asynchrony) values will be statistically compared. For the analysis of categorical data, the Chi-Square test will be applied. Bayesian analysis may also be used as necessary during the writing of the study. The results obtained will be interpreted and reported by the researchers. Results with a "p" value below 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
"In intensive care units, therapeutic paralysis has been a routine treatment method for many years in a select group of patients. Sufficient and appropriate sedation in patients undergoing therapeutic paralysis is crucial to prevent awareness and reduce the risk of excessive sedation. Both inadequate and excessive sedation levels can be highly detrimental to the patient. Clinical assessment may not always provide accurate information regarding sedation depth. Recently, the frequency and workload of therapeutic paralysis treatment in intensive care units have increased due to COVID-19 pneumonia. Therefore, the investigators believe that inadequate sedation may be common in these patients. Processed electroencephalogram parameters such as bispectral index or patient state index (PSI), routinely used in operating rooms and intensive care units, are commonly used to indicate sedation depth. In this study, the investigators aimed to determine sedation levels in patients during paralysis, assess the prevalence of inadequate or excessive sedation, and observe the doses of sedatives and analgesics used."
The weaning failure is a paramount challenge when aggressive discontinuation of respiratory support in ARDS. The aim of the study is to improve weaning safety and efficacy by a transient postextubation non-invasive respiratory support.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is associated with high mortality, some of which can be attributed to ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) when artificial ventilation is not customized to the severity of lung injury. As ARDS is characterized by a decrease in aerated lung volume, reducing tidal volume (VT) from 12 to 6 mL/kg of predicted body weight (PBW) was shown to improve survival more than 20 years ago. Since then, the VT has been normalized to the PBW, meaning to the theoretical lung size (before the disease), rather than tailored to the severity of lung injury, i.e., to the size of aerated lung volume. During ARDS, the aerated lung volume is correlated to the respiratory system compliance (Crs). The driving pressure (ΔP), defined as the difference between the plateau pressure and the positive end expiratory pressure, represents the ratio between the VT and the Crs. Therefore, the ΔP normalizes the VT to a surrogate of the aerated lung available for ventilation of the diseased lung, rather than to the theoretical lung size of the healthy lung, and thus represents more accurately the actual strain applied to the lungs. In a post hoc analysis of 9 randomized controlled trials, Amato et al. found that higher ΔP was a better predictor of mortality than higher VT, with an increased risk of death when the ΔP > 14 cm H2O. These findings have been confirmed in subsequent meta-analysis and large-scale observational data. In a prospective study including 50 patients, the investigators showed that a ΔPguided ventilation strategy targeting a ΔP between 12 and 14 cm H2O significantly reduced the mechanical power, a surrogate for the risk of VILI, compared to a conventional PBW-guided ventilation. In the present study, the investigators hypothesize that the physiological individualization of ventilation (ΔP-guided VT) may improve the outcome of patients with ARDS compared to traditional anthropometrical adjustment (PBW-guided VT)
Rationale: In COVID19 single-targeted immunomodulation, mostly via an IL-6 receptor blocker, was used by a one-size fits all non-targeted approach. In future pandemics the same might occur. However, for individual patients, this might not yield optimal treatment. Objectives: This project aims to identify a way to individualize and target immunomodulation, using COVID19 as a testcase for the future. - Identify immunological pathways which are associated with outcome in C-ARDS. - Test whether an individualized biomarker-based approach has an effect on outcome and costs when using single-target immunomodulation in C-ARDS(Tocilizumab, Anakinra, etc.). - Explore whether other immunological pathways were present in patients with C-ARDS which could have been intervened with medication which is already available and has been described in ARDS or similar diseases. Study type: Retrospective observational multicenter study in the Netherlands. Study population: Adult patients (≥ 18 years) hospitalized and admitted to the ICU with COVID-19 and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (i.e., receiving invasive mechanical ventilation) will be included. Intervention (if applicable): Not applicable (retrospective study design). Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Given the retrospective nature of the study, no burden, risks or benefits for the patient are associated with participation. The target population of this study is specific to hospitalized patients with COVID-19.
This is a phase IIa, dose-ranging, proof-of-concept study of MRG-001 in patients with ARDS. The aim is to determine the safety and preliminary efficacy of MRG-001 across two dose ranges.
Patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA) has deleterious effects on the lungs. PVA can lead to acute lung injury and worsening hypoxemia through biotrauma. Little is known about how PVA affects lung aeration estimated by electric impedance tomography (EIT). Artificial intelligence can promote the detection of PVA and with its help, EIT measurements can be correlated to asynchrony.
In order to clarify the clinical efficacy of electroacupuncture on inhibiting systemic inflammatory response, improving respiratory mechanics parameters and prognosis in patients with sepsis-related ARDS.
The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness and safety of sivelestat sodium in preventing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) following cardiac surgery, with the objective of providing evidence-based support for its clinical application.