View clinical trials related to Radiation.
Filter by:Prospective randomized evaluation of adaptive radiotherapy in the definitive radiotherapy of locally advanced gynecologic carcinoma (e.g. cervical carcinoma, endometrial carcinoma, vaginal carcinoma), in the postoperative situation or first series of external beam radiotherapy and in patients in whom radical surgery or HDR brachytherapy as dose boost is not an option.
Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) includes image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and also offers further possibilities for plan adaptation. A particularly high benefit can be expected for patients in whom the clinical target volume (CTV) can show a significant change in shape from fraction to fraction due to anatomical deviations. The shape and position constancy of the CTV during the course of the series is examined in this trial. Dosimetric disadvantages of this type have not been reported so far. The aim of this study is to identify patients who benefit from ART at an early stage and to select them for this method, and then to continue to offer ART to this patient group. If a relevant reduction in the minimum planning target volume (PTV) margins with ART compared to IGRT is demonstrated in this study, patients could be treated with ART.
pMMR/MSS and 32 dMMR/MSI-H patientspatients were planned to be enrolled. Patients with dMMR/MSI-H will be randomly assigned to the immunotherapy arm or short-course radiotherapy sequential immunotherapy arm; pMMR/MSS patients will receive capecitabine-irinotecan based concurrent radiotherapy before being randomly assigned to the XELIRI or FOLFRINOX arm. The rate of complete response (sustained cCR for ≥ 1 year), long-term prognosis and adverse effects will be analyzed.
This is the first prospective randomized and controlled study on the efficacy and safety of TiLOOP® Bra mesh in patients with expander-implant breast reconstruction. The investigators hypothesize that incoporating TiLOOP Bra mesh with tissue expanders will reduce the rates of capsular contraction, improve the efficiency of expansion and provide better aesthetic result.
The purpose of this study is to validate whether clinically low-risk, and RecurIndex high-risk N1 patients receiving regional lymph node radiotherapy can further improve clinical outcomes.
Patients with a biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for moderate- or high- risk prostate cancer are randomly assigned to hypofractionated, accelerated high dose radiation therapy group (65 Gy, 26 fractions) and a control group of standard treatment group (66 Gy, 33 fractions). The criteria for stratification at randomization include 1) risk groups, 2) androgen deprivation therapy, and 3) PSA before salvage radiation therapy, which affect biochemical recurrence. It is expected that hypofractionated, accelerated high dose radiation therapy will have a superiority in terms of biochemical control to conventional radiation therapy, and the present study would like to confirm this. In addition, we aimed to evaluate and compare the toxicity and quality of life index of two radiation therapy regimens.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of totally neoadjuvant FOLFOXIRI chemotherapy (irinotecan, oxaliplatin and fluorouracil) followed by short-course radiation therapy and XELOX chemotherapy in the patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.
Cervical cancer with pelvic or para-aortic node involvement has a poor prognosis. Despite low-quality data, the routine practice to treat these patients is radiation with concurrent cisplatin. The aim of this study is to compare systemic chemotherapy with observation after radiation with concurrent cisplatin of cervical cancer ( with pelvic or para-aortic node involvement) for incidence of adverse events and local recurrence rate.
Definitive treatment protocol for high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with intracavitary radiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: A phase II trial
This study has the purpose to investigate the benefit of treating breast cancer patients in prone position. This treatment is compared to the standard technique in our center (supine position with or without respiratory gating). The investigators want to compare the doses on the organs at risk (heart and lungs) in the different techniques.