View clinical trials related to Rectal Neoplasms.
Filter by:The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if PD-1 monoclonal antibody combined with radical chemoradiotherapy works to treat rectal squamous cell carcinoma (rSCC). lt will also learn about the safety of the regime. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does PD-1 monoclonal antibody combined with radical chemoradiotherapy improve survival prognosis? What is the complete response rate (CCR) of the regime? Researchers will compare PD-1 monoclonal antibody combined with radical chemoradiotherapy to previous study to see if this regime works to treat rSCCs. Participants will receive chemotherapy with DDP and 5-FU, immunotherapy with PD-1 monoclonal antibody and radiotherapy with a total dose of 50-54GY.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if using topical tretinoin will help patients with colorectal cancer who are experiencing an acneiform rash as a side effect of their treatment. Researchers will compare the use of tretinoin on one side of the face to the use of a placebo on the other side of the face to see if there is an impact.
In the era of laparoscopy, ileostomy via specimen extraction site has been proposed as a novel approach for temporary ostomy creation to prevent anastomotic leak after laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection. Whether suturing the layer of the peritoneum and anterior rectus sheath affects the safety of this novel approach has not been investigated.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a dietary intervention (FEED-FF) that includes fermented foods (FF), among locally advanced rectal cancer patients, and to explore whether this diet can improve outcomes in rectal cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy (CRT).
To explore the complete response (CR) rate of improved short-course radiotherapy combined with CAPOX and tislelizumab for locally Advanced Mid-low Rectal Cancer
The goal of this one-arm clinical trial is to implement and study the oncological outcomes of nonoperative management of rectal cancer having complete clinical response to neoadjuvant therapy. The main questions to answer are - if the oncological results of nonoperative management after Nordic practice in chemoradiotherapy indications differ from experiences elsewhere - what is the organ preservation rate - what is the local regrowth rate
This study aims to compare the postoperative outcomes of low rectal cancer patients who underwent surgery with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction (NOSE) versus traditional Pfannenstiel extraction.
This project aims to evaluate the role of 18F-FAPI combined with 18F-FDG PET/MRI imaging in quantitatively and accurately evaluating the grading of rectal cancer after SCRT neoadjuvant therapy in patients with advanced rectal cancer as the research object, with postoperative histopathological analysis as the reference index, and to assess the ability of patients to achieve pCR. A diagnostic model and evaluation system will also be constructed.
Neoadjuvant therapy is the standard diagnosis and treatment strategy for locally advanced rectal cancer defined by MRI in order to achieve tumor regression, thus affecting the selection of surgical strategy and circumferential margin, improving the safety of operation and the prognosis of patients. This study focused on the related clinical factors such as tumor regression before and after neoadjuvant therapy, combined with preoperative high-dimensional features such as radiomics, to predict the related factors of tumor regression of locally advanced rectal cancer, and validate it with multicenter. In order to develop an accurate model that can be applied to the real world and stratify the risk of locally advanced rectal cancer patients before treatment.
This study analyzed the efficacy differences between neoadjuvant therapy and direct surgical treatment in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer in the real world. The aim was to evaluate the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on overall survival, disease-free survival, and local recurrence-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, explore the population benefiting most from neoadjuvant therapy, and provide evidence-based medicine for the benefits of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with colorectal cancer in the real world.