View clinical trials related to Pulpitis - Irreversible.
Filter by:Root canal therapy (RCT) is indicated once the pulp is diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis. Despite favorable success rate reported for RCT in vital cases, it is time consuming, and might increases fracture susceptibility of teeth. With the advancement of materials and better understanding of pulpal healing, vital pulp therapy is practiced as an alternative treatment with high success rate. The aim of this study is to explore the outcome, quality of life and patient satisfaction after full pulpotomy compared to RCT.
Of all the various pulpotomy medicaments that have been studied till to date, three agents have been selected for this study to compare their efficacy. CH being the control, MTA being one of the most recommended biomaterial and PRF that in addition to being a biomaterial is an autologous agent. Uptil now there have been no prospective trials using these three pulpotomy agents in mature permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis in our part of the world and even the international studies that have been done utilized different methodologies with no unanimous conclusion. This is the reason that at present this treatment regime (pulpotomy) showing better perspectives cannot be presented with confidence as a predictable treatment option to the patients with irreversible pulpitis. By virtue of this study this challenge is being undertaken. Hypothesis: ALTERNATE HYPOTHESIS There is a difference between the efficacy of the PRF, MTA and CH when used as pulpotomy medicaments in mature permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis NULL HPOTHESIS There is no difference in efficacy of the PRF, MTA and CH when used as pulpotomy medicaments in mature permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis
Pilot study involving 20 patients undergoing dental treatment prior to radiation therapy. Comparison of outcome parameters to existing data of age and gender matched patients.
The aim of this study was to clinically and radiographically evaluate the effectiveness of MTA, Biodentine, Platelet Rich Fibrin along with Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Platelet Rich Fibrin along with Biodentine as pulpotomy medicament in patients with pulpitis.
when caries reaches the pulp of the tooth, it has to be removed and replaced with a material. In this study im examining the clinical and radiographic signs and symptoms after using different natural materials in pulpotomized molars and compared to the formocresol.
The aim of the study is to perform a clinical and radiographic evaluation of 70% Ethanol Alcohol versus Normal Saline as root canal irrigating solutions in partial pulpectomy of primary molars with Metapex.
This study will compare the outcome of partial pulpotomy and complete pulpotomy in mature permanent molars with clinical signs indicative of irreversible pulpitis
The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of Chitosan scaffold and Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) when used as pulpotomy agents in mature permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis.
The study aims to compare two methods of repairing and saving a badly damaged or infected tooth. One method is called root canal treatment (RoCT) and the other (new method) is called pulpotomy. RoCT involves removing the damaged area of the tooth including the tooth nerve (called the pulp), cleaning, disinfecting and sealing it. Pulpotomy however attempts to preserve as much of the tooth nerve as possible (keeping the tooth alive). RoCT is more expensive and painful. Therefore, some patients delay or avoid getting treated, resulting in later complications treated in an emergency setting. This research will aim to show that pulpotomy is less painful, less involved (i.e. less invasive), less time consuming and consequently more cost effective. Long term costs of dental treatment as well as the improved quality of life will therefore offer benefits for patients, public and the NHS who use dental services. Caries (tooth decay) is the most common diseases in the world. The NHS spends at least £3.4 billion per year on dental visits or at dental hospitals. This does not include private (societal) costs to individuals who do not qualify for NHS dental treatment. Consequently, those who end up avoiding or delaying treatment result in complications often treated through the NHS. We have therefore chosen a randomized controlled trial design, a gold standard method to compare the effectiveness of the two treatment options. The participants will be 168 dental patients (male or female) from different parts (London and Liverpool) of the UK so that results can be generalized. This design was considered in consultation with a member of the public (a co-applicant) who will be involved in the trial from the start to completion. The results will be published and discussed at conferences as well as through our patient and public network.
Pulpotomy has been proposed in the last decade as a definitive treatment of mature permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis due to the better understanding of the pulp biology and development of bioactive materials . This technique involves removal of the coronal portion of the pulp that has undergo degenerative and irreversible changes to the level of the canal orifices and leaving the healthy vital radicular portion of the pulp. The surrogate marker for the degree of inflammation and the healing potential of the remaining pulp tissue has been suggested to be the ability to control the bleeding after pulp amputation. By preserving the pulp vitality, this can help in maintaining proprioceptive, reparative, innervation (tooth sensitivity), vascularization, and damping functions. The vital pulp can continue to serve the function of protecting the tooth from overload by means of protective feedback mechanism and preventing fracture because of the presence of pulp and organic tissue in the dentinal tubules..