Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00486811
Other study ID # 335862
Secondary ID 2006-005783-67
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received
Last updated
Start date June 2007
Est. completion date July 2008

Study information

Verified date October 2019
Source Grünenthal GmbH
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether tapentadol (CG5503) prolonged-release (PR) tablets at doses of 100-250 mg twice daily provide a better pain relief in patients with moderate to severe chronic pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee than a placebo (a medication without active substance). In addition the tolerability of CG5503 PR will be assessed. One third of the patients will receive CG5503 and one third will receive placebo. For further comparison one third of the patients will receive oxycodone controlled release (CR) at doses of 20-50 mg twice daily which is an active approved pain medication. Please note that tapentadol ER (Extended Release) and tapentadol PR (Prolonged Release) are identical and used interchangeably. This is due to United States of America and European naming conventions.


Description:

This is a randomized (study medication assigned to patients by chance), double-blind (neither patient nor investigator knows which patient gets which study medication, i.e. CG5503, placebo, oxycodone), placebo and active control study. The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of orally administered tapentadol (CG5503) prolonged-release (PR) at doses of 100-250 mg (base) twice daily in patients with moderate to severe chronic pain from osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. The study will consist of five periods: screening (to assess eligibility), washout (3-7 days with determination of a baseline pain intensity), titration (of dose over 3 weeks to the optimal individual level), maintenance (investigational drug intake for 12 weeks with adjustments allowed), and follow-up (2 weeks after end of treatment). The study hypothesis is that the study drug will be more effective than placebo in reducing patients' pain intensity. The secondary objectives include the collection of pharmacokinetic (related to how the body absorbs, distributes, changes and excretes the drug) information for dose verification. The efficacy objectives will be assessed by comparing the baseline pain level to the pain level during the maintenance period. This will be done by looking at the patients' pain diary information (electronic diaries).


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 990
Est. completion date July 2008
Est. primary completion date July 2008
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 40 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis of the knee based on the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and functional capacity class of I- III;

- Patients taking analgesic medications for at least 3 months prior to screening and dissatisfied with their current therapy;

- Patients requiring opioid treatment must be taking daily doses of opioid- based analgesic, equivalent to <160 mg of oral morphine;

- Baseline score of >=5 on an 11-point numeric rating scale, calculated as the average pain intensity during the last 3 days prior to randomization.

Exclusion Criteria:

- History of alcohol and/or drug abuse in Investigator's judgment;

- Chronic hepatitis B or C, or HIV, presence of active hepatitis B or C within the past 3 months;

- Life-long history of seizure disorder or epilepsy;

- History of malignancy within past 2 years, with exception of basal cell carcinoma that has been successfully treated;

- Uncontrolled hypertension;

- Patients with severely impaired renal function;

- Patients with moderate to severely impaired hepatic function or with laboratory values reflecting inadequate hepatic function,

- Treatment with neuroleptics, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRI), tricyclic antidepressants, anticonvulsants, or anti-parkinsonian drugs, treatment with any other analgesic therapy than investigational medication or rescue medication during the trial.

Study Design


Intervention

Drug:
Tapentadol ER (100 to 250 mg twice daily)
50, 100, 150, 200, 250 mg twice a day (BID) during 15 weeks (3 weeks titration and 12 weeks maintenance)
Matching Placebo (twice daily)
Matching Placebo during 15 weeks (3 weeks titration and 12 weeks maintenance)
Oxycodone CR (20 to 50 mg twice daily)
10, 20, 30, 40, 50 mg twice a day (BID) during 15 weeks (3 weeks titration and 12 weeks maintenance)

Locations

Country Name City State
Austria Site 043005 Innsbruck
Austria Site 043006 Mitterdorf
Austria Site 043002 Salzburg
Austria Site 043001 Vienna
Austria Site 043004 Vienna
Austria Site 043003 Wiener Neustadt
Croatia Site 385003 Karlovac
Croatia Site 385001 Osijek
Croatia Site 385004 Sisak
Croatia Seite 385005 Zagreb
Croatia Site 385002 Zagreb
Germany Site 049002 Berlin
Germany Site 049008 Berlin
Germany Site 049010 Berlin
Germany Site 049003 Dresden
Germany Site 049004 Frankfurt
Germany Site 049007 Hamburg
Germany Site 049001 Leipzig
Germany Site 049005 Magdeburg
Germany Site 049009 Schwerin
Germany Site 049006 Wiesbaden
Hungary Site 036003 Budapest
Hungary Site 036005 Budapest
Hungary Site 036006 Budapest
Hungary Site 036009 Budapest
Hungary Site 036008 Debrecen
Hungary Site 036004 Kecskemet
Hungary Site 036007 Kecskemét
Hungary Site 036002 Visegrad
Italy Site 039002 Chieti
Italy Site 039003 Milano
Italy Site 039004 Pavia
Italy Site 039001 Perugia
Latvia Site 371002 Bauska
Latvia Site 371004 Riga
Latvia Site 371005 Riga
Netherlands Site 031008 Eindhoven
Netherlands Site 031003 Losser
Netherlands Site 031006 Oude Pekela
Netherlands Site 031004 s'Hertogenbosch
Netherlands Site 031007 Spijkenisse
Poland Site 048007 Bielsko-Biala
Poland Site 048006 Katowice
Poland Site 048005 Konskie
Poland Site 048004 Krakow
Poland Site 048001 Lublin
Poland Site 048008 Mielec
Poland Site 048003 Piekary Slaskie
Poland Site 048010 Rzeszow
Poland Site 048009 Warszawa
Poland Site 048002 Wroclaw
Poland Site 048011 Wroclaw
Portugal Site 351001 Coimbra
Portugal Site 351003 Faro
Portugal Sites 351008 Funchal
Portugal Site 351005 Guimaraes
Portugal Site 351004 Lisboa
Portugal Site 351009 Lisboa
Portugal Site 351002 Ponta Delgada
Romania Site 040001 Bucharest
Romania Site 040002 Bucharest
Romania Site 040005 Bucharest
Romania Site 040006 Bucharest
Romania Site 040007 Bucharest
Romania Site 040008 Bucharest
Romania Site 040009 Bucharest
Romania Site 040011 Bucharest
Romania Site 040004 Câmpulung
Romania Site 040010 Craiova
Slovakia Site 421005 Banska Bystrica
Slovakia Site 421001 Kosice
Slovakia Site 421003 Poprad
Slovakia Site 421004 Presov
Slovakia Site 421002 Rimavska Sobota
Spain Site 034002 Alicante
Spain Site 034009 Benidorm
Spain Site 034005 L'Hospitalet de Llobregat
Spain Site 034007 La roca del Valles
Spain Site 034015 Malaga
Spain Site 034008 Mostoles
Spain Site 034003 Oviedo
Spain Site 034013 Oviedo
Spain Site 034016 Sevilla
Spain Site 034001 Torrelavega
Spain Site 034012 Valencia
Spain Site 034004 Vic
United Kingdom Site 044012 Birmingham
United Kingdom Site 044004 Blackpool
United Kingdom Site 044009 Bradford
United Kingdom Site 044013 Cardiff
United Kingdom Site 044002 Chesterfield
United Kingdom Site 044018 Chorley
United Kingdom Site 044005 Ecclesfield
United Kingdom Site 044008 Falkirk
United Kingdom Site 044001 Kenton
United Kingdom Site 044006 London
United Kingdom Site 044011 London
United Kingdom Site 044016 Reading
United Kingdom Site 044003 Solihull
United Kingdom Site 044007 Woolpit

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Grünenthal GmbH Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

Austria,  Croatia,  Germany,  Hungary,  Italy,  Latvia,  Netherlands,  Poland,  Portugal,  Romania,  Slovakia,  Spain,  United Kingdom, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change From Baseline of the Average Pain Intensity Overall in the 12-week Maintenance Period of the Daily Pain Intensity on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). For this twice daily pain assessment, the participants were required to indicate the level of pain experienced over the previous 12 hours on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine". The lower the value the less pain in the treatment group. Negative values indicate a reduction in pain. Change from baseline over the 12 week Maintenance Period
Secondary Change From Baseline of the Average Pain Intensity Based on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12. The twice daily pain assessments were averaged. The participants were to indicate their pain on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine". The lower the value the less pain intensity. Change from Baseline to Week 12 of the Maintenance Period
Secondary Patient Global Impression of Change In the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) the participant indicates the perceived change over the treatment period. The participant is requested to choose one of seven categories. Scores range from very much improved to very much worse. Baseline; End of 12 week maintenance period
Secondary Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario McMaster Questionnaire (WOMAC) Global Score Assessing Pain, Disability and Joint Stiffness of the Knee Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12 Change from baseline to week 12 of Western Ontario McMaster Questionnaire (WOMAC) Global Score: WOMAC is measured with a Likert ordinal scale (the participant gives one of 5 possible answers) from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate that a symptom is bothersome and physically disabling. Change from baseline to week 12 of the maintenance period
Secondary Time to Treatment Discontinuation Due to Lack of Efficacy The median time to treatment discontinuation due to lack of efficacy from baseline to endpoint. Baseline to week 12 of the maintenance period
Secondary Change in the Health Survey Scores Form (SF-36) The Scores Form 36 (SF-36) includes several brief board questions on 8 aspects, (physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health) that a participant was asked to score over the last week. A higher score indicates an improvement in health. All domains are scored on a scale from 0 (negative health) to 100 (positive health), with 100 representing the best possible health state. Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Maintenance Period
Secondary EuroQol-5 (EQ-5D) Health Status Index Outcome Over Time The participant scored the EuroQol-5. This is a five dimensional health state classification. Each dimension is assessed on a 3-point ordinal scale (1=no problems, 2=some problems, 3=extreme problems). The responses to the five EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 to 1, with 1.00 indicating "full health" and 0 representing dead. The positive values indicate that during the study the health status improved. Comparison of Baseline to Week 12 of the Maintenance Period
Secondary Sleep Questionnaire: Change From Baseline in Sleep Latency Time in Hours to the Last Week of the Maintenance Period. The Sleep Questionnaire addressed the following question: "How long after bedtime/lights out did you fall asleep last night(hours)?". The mean change from baseline to 12 weeks was studied. Decrease in time, measured in hours, indicates an improvement. Week 12 of the maintenance period compared to baseline
Secondary Sleep Questionnaire: Amount of Time Slept in Hours The Sleep Questionnaire addressed the following question: "How long did you sleep last night?". The mean change for the number of hours slept during the night before from baseline to 12 weeks was studied. Baseline to Week 12 of the maintenance period
Secondary Sleep Questionnaire: Number of Awakenings During Sleep The Sleep Questionnaire addressed the following question: "How many times did you wake up during the night?". Sleep was assessed by the subject once a week during the entire double-blind treatment period. Reported are the baseline and end of maintenance period. Generally the less the number of awakenings the better the sleep. Week 12 of the maintenance period compared with baseline
Secondary Number of Participants Reporting a Category From the Quality of Sleep (Sleep Questionnaire) The Sleep Questionnaire addressed the following question: "Please rate the overall quality of your sleep last night?" The quality of sleep at baseline and prior to completion of treatment are reported. The participant can choose one of the following options: Excellent, good, fair and poor. Week 12 of the maintenance period compared to baseline
Secondary Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) Over Time The Constipation Assessment (PAC-SYM) is a 12-item self-report questionnaire that assesses the severity of symptoms of constipation. Participants are asked "How severe have each of these symptoms been in the last two weeks?" e.g. "Pain in your stomach". There are 3 subscales: 4 questions on Abdominal symptoms, 3 on rectal symptoms and 5 on stool symptoms. Responses are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (absence of symptom) to 4 (very severe symptoms). If the changes in the overall or subscale scores are positive then there is a worsening in symptoms associated with constipation. Change from Baseline to Week 12 of the Maintenance Period
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT05559255 - Changes in Pain, Spasticity, and Quality of Life After Use of Counterstrain Treatment in Individuals With SCI N/A
Completed NCT04748367 - Leveraging on Immersive Virtual Reality to Reduce Pain and Anxiety in Children During Immunization in Primary Care N/A
Terminated NCT04356352 - Lidocaine, Esmolol, or Placebo to Relieve IV Propofol Pain Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT05057988 - Virtual Empowered Relief for Chronic Pain N/A
Completed NCT04466111 - Observational, Post Market Study in Treating Chronic Upper Extremity Limb Pain
Recruiting NCT06206252 - Can Medical Cannabis Affect Opioid Use?
Completed NCT05868122 - A Study to Evaluate a Fixed Combination of Acetaminophen/Naproxen Sodium in Acute Postoperative Pain Following Bunionectomy Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT05006976 - A Naturalistic Trial of Nudging Clinicians in the Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic. The NSAC Nudge Study N/A
Completed NCT03273114 - Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT06087432 - Is PNF Application Effective on Temporomandibular Dysfunction N/A
Completed NCT05508594 - Efficacy and Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Relationship of Intranasally Administered Sufentanil, Ketamine, and CT001 Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting NCT03646955 - Partial Breast Versus no Irradiation for Women With Early Breast Cancer N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03472300 - Prevalence of Self-disclosed Knee Trouble and Use of Treatments Among Elderly Individuals
Completed NCT03678168 - A Comparison Between Conventional Throat Packs and Pharyngeal Placement of Tampons in Rhinology Surgeries N/A
Completed NCT03931772 - Online Automated Self-Hypnosis Program N/A
Completed NCT03286543 - Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the SPRINT Beta System N/A
Completed NCT02913027 - Can We Improve the Comfort of Pelvic Exams? N/A
Terminated NCT02181387 - Acetaminophen Use in Labor - Does Use of Acetaminophen Reduce Neuraxial Analgesic Drug Requirement During Labor? Phase 4
Recruiting NCT06032559 - Implementation and Effectiveness of Mindfulness Oriented Recovery Enhancement as an Adjunct to Methadone Treatment Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT03613155 - Assessment of Anxiety in Patients Treated by SMUR Toulouse and Receiving MEOPA as Part of Their Care