View clinical trials related to Pain.
Filter by:Objective To investigate the analgesic effect (measured with NIPS) of breastfeeding in addition to skin-to-skin contact versus other methods of non-pharmacological analgesia during blood sampling through heel lance in healthy term neonates. The influences of non-pharmacological methods on crying time, percentage of crying while sampling, heart rate, number of attempts and duration of sampling were studied. Methods Randomised controlled trial performed on 136 healthy term newborns in the maternity ward of a tertiary hospital. The inclusion criteria were: healthy term neonates, wish to breastfeed and absence of feeding during the previous 60 minutes. Neonates were randomly assigned to four groups: group 1, breastfed with skin-to-skin contact ; group 2, oral sucrose with skin-to-skin contact ; group 3, skin-to-skin contact ; or group 4, receiving oral sucrose Data for the primary objective was analysed per intention to treat. This study was approved by local ethical committee.
Epidural analgesia for pain relief in labor may not be suitable for all patients, and intravenous patient controlled analgesia (IV PCA) with opioids offers the best alternative. The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of two methods remifentanil administration in the form of either an infusion or PCA demand bolus (intravenous injection of a single dose over a short period of time). Currently, our hospital gives remifentanil by demand bolus, however it may be equally effective, with less side effects, to give the drug as an infusion.
There has been very little investigation into the management of pain from 2nd trimester termination of pregnancy or unexpected fetal loss. The standard of practice in North America is usually intravenous patient controlled analgesia (IV PCA), using a narcotic wuch as fentanyl. The goal of this study is to compare the quality of recovery after termination of pregnancy using fentanyl IV PCA or patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA), a standard of care for live births. The study will be conducted as a randomized controlled trial.
Uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy will in most patients result in moderate to severe pain until the first postoperative day. This will subside during the second and third postoperative day [1]. A feeling of low general well-being will also be present until the first postoperative day and subside during the next couple of days [2]. To achieve faster recovery after laparoscopic interventions it has been shown that a reduction in the size of laparoscopic ports and thereby incisions can reduce postoperative pain [3,4]. A new minimal invasive surgical technique is based on the principle of completely eliminating the use of ports through the abdominal wall. This new technique is called Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) and is defined by acquiring minimal invasive access to the abdominal cavity through the body's natural openings like the mouth and stomach, anus, urethra and vagina. With the NOTES technique one can completely avoid incisions in the abdominal wall and thereby reduce the surgical trauma. The benefits of this technique is a reduction of postoperative pain, elimination of incisional hernias, prevention of wound infections, reduction of peritoneal adherence formation, achieving a faster recovery and a better cosmetic result [7,8]. The most documented and well-described way for gaining NOTES access to the abdominal cavity is through the vagina, transvaginal (TV). TV NOTES has mainly been used for cholecystectomy because of the direct line of vision to the upper abdomen and gallbladder that is achieved through this opening. Compilation of results show that TV NOTES cholecystectomy can be implemented with low complication rates [20-22]. One retrospective case-control and one prospective observational study report less postoperative pain, reduced consumption of analgesics and faster recovery for TV NOTES compared to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy [23,24]. To date there are no systematic prospective randomized data on whether or not TV NOTES cholecystectomy leads to a better surgical outcome. In the present study the postoperative course after TV NOTES cholecystectomy will be compared to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a prospective randomized and blinded trial. The outcome of the randomization between the two surgical techniques will be blinded to patient and the nurse staff for the first 72 hours after the operation. The primary outcome parameter will be postoperative pain score during the first 24 hours. Secondary outcome parameters are postoperative pain score for the first 72 hours, fatigue, well-being, nausea, consumption of analgesics, complications, cosmetic result and sexual function. The hypothesis being that TV NOTES cholecystectomy gives less postoperative pain, fatigue and nausea, a reduction in analgesics and a better cosmetic result and general well-being than conventional 4 port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Bariatric patients usually require the use of either intravenous or oral opioid medications. The use of opioids, however, is often associated with side-effects such as nausea, sedation pruritus, urinary retention and respiratory depression with often delay patient discharge. This study makes use of intravenous acetaminophen , a non-opioid analgesic preoperatively to determine if this will decrease the use of opioids post-operatively for pain management in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery.
The purpose of the study is to determine the efficacity of a simple blind technic of loco regional anaesthesia of the sciatic nerve compared to the gold standard in emergency medecine : the intravenous morphine for treated the severe pain of leg, ankle or foot trauma in the prehospital setting and mountain rescue.
Bone metastases and associated pain are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Most approved therapies have shown some ability to reduce soft tissue lesions but none meaningfully impacts bone metastases (as demonstrated by lack of resolution of lesions on bone scan with these agents) or the pain associated with these metastases. This study will evaluate the effect of cabozantinib versus mitoxantrone plus prednisone on pain response and bone scan response in men with CRPC.
The purpose of this study is to investigate clinical outcomes from two current standard of care pain control procedures performed for patients undergoing pacemaker insertion.
The purpose of this study is to assess early ambulation following total knee replacement in patients receiving continuous adductor canal block with posterior capsular injection compared to continuous femoral nerve block with tibial nerve block.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of SSR411298 200 mg daily compared to placebo as adjunctive treatment for persistent cancer pain based on Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary Objectives are: - To evaluate the effect of SSR411298 200 mg daily on pain, breakthrough pain frequency, background therapy utilization, mood, patient satisfaction of pain relief, nausea, constipation, healthcare utilization and quality of life; - To evaluate the tolerability and safety of SSR411298 as adjunctive treatment for persistent cancer pain; - To characterize patient disease, in terms of cancer, cancer treatment, cancer pain and cancer pain treatment; - To evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure of SSR411298 as adjunctive treatment for persistent cancer pain; - To assess endocannabinoid plasma concentrations.