View clinical trials related to Osteoarthritis, Hip.
Filter by:In this study, we aim to develop a statistical shape model and use it to reconstruct the shape of acetabula with severe defects (Paprosky 3a-3b). This will allow us to visualise and assess the morphology of the missing bone. In future studies we will use the obtained results to improve the design of acetabular implants for revision surgery.
One of the goals of Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is to reconstruct leg length as adequately as possible. In order to achieve this one needs landmarks that are visible both on the templating X ray as well as during surgery. The classical posterior and lateral approaches often rely on the distance from the greater trochanter (GT) to the shoulder of the femoral stem or the distance from the lesser trochanter (LT) to the side of the neck osteotomy. If the surgeon finds out on the digital template that the distance from the GT to the shoulder of the implant should be X mm to achieve equal leg length, than the surgeon can try to reconstruct this during surgery. During the Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) these landmarks usually are not visible or require additional dissection injuring important soft tissue structures along the way. One anatomical structure that appears to be always visible during the DAA is the External Obturator tendon (EO). It was recently confirmed that the level of insertion of the EO onto the proximal femur can also always be determined on pre-operative X rays. It therefore represents one of the few landmarks that is visible both on the templating X ray as well as during DAA THA. Indeed, many hip surgeons, including ourselves, believe that if the shoulder of the femoral stem is near the insertion of the EO leg length cannot be far off. However, there is no clinical data to support this. The investigators would therefore like to the correlate the distance observed intra-operatively to the actual established distance on the post-operative X ray.
The principal objectives of the study are to evaluate early and mid-term fixation of the REDAPT revision hip stem and acetabular cup as measured by stem subsidence and proximal cup migration at 2 and 5 years post-surgery through model-based RSA. Secondary objectives include; evaluate the progression of migration between 1 and 2 years and between 2 and 5 years, assess pre- to post-surgery patient improvement in function and health status, evaluate femoral and acetabular radiolucency at 2 and 5 years, and assess patterns of stem migrate on for different revision scenarios (preservation of the trochanters and extended trochanteric osteotomy).
This is a prospective, multi-location safety and effectiveness study, and data registry of autologous adult ADRCs generated by the Transpose® RT System in subjects with OA in the shoulder, wrist, knee, hip, or ankle.
This study is a multicenter, retrospective and prospective, non-controlled, non-randomized post market clinical follow-up study. The objectives of this study are to confirm the long-term safety, performance and clinical benefits the Exception Cementless femoral stem (standard and varized) when used in primary total hip arthroplasty.
The primary objective of this study is to characterize survivorship of the Echo Bi-Metric Microplasty stem in unilateral or bilateral primary total hip arthroplasty at 5 years postoperative.
The overall aim of this single-centre, prospective randomised controlled trial is to compare clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes in CO THA versus Mako THA. Patients undergoing Mako THA will form the investigation group and those undergoing CO THA will form the control group.
Hip osteoarthritis is associated with joint pain, physical disability, decreased muscle strength and poor health status, and the most common cause for total hip arthroplasty. No studies have investigated the effect of total hip arthroplasty compared to non-surgical treatment in patients with end-stage hip osteoarthritis. This comparison is of upmost importance as it is unknown whether non-surgical treatment may be used as an alternate to surgery. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether total hip arthroplasty followed by standard care is superior to progressive resistance training for improving hip function and pain in patients with end-stage hip osteoarthritis. The hypothesis is that patients treated with total hip arthroplasty will improve more than patients treated with progressive resistance training.
A randomized controlled study comparing two types of cementless femoral stems (LCU and Corail) and two types of acetabular components (DeltaTT and Pinnacle Duofix) in primary total hip arthroplasty. Primary outcome are component migration measured by RSA, wear and patient reported outcome. Patients are evaluated up to 15 years postoperatively.
Hypothesis: The spa therapy treatment could improve health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in subjects with knee and/or hip osteoarthritis, and patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Main objective: Analyze if HRQOL in patients with knee and/or hip osteoarthritis, and patients with rheumatoid arthritis is modified by spa therapy treatment in the spa of Fitero (Spain). Design: Prospective observational study Participants: Fitero's spa users aged between 45-80 years old, diagnosed with knee and/or hip osteoarthritis, and also with rheumatoid arthritis. At least 40 patients of each type will be included in the study. Participants must be receiving a treatment of at least ten days. Main Variable: The scores obtained in the Euroqol5Dimensions-5Levels questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) (for all subjects), the Western Ontario MacMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire, for subjects with knee and/or hip osteoarthritis, and the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), for subjects with rheumatoid arthritis. Other variables: sociodemographic, anthropometric, clinics, and related with spa treatment. Follow-up duration: 9 months.