View clinical trials related to Osteoarthritis, Hip.
Filter by:The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Insignia™ Hip Stem for global market access and post-market clinical follow-up up to 10 years postoperative.
EUROSCUP Fixe is intended for use in primary and revision total hip replacement surgery. Hip replacement is intended to provide increased patient mobility and reduce pain by replacing the damages hip joint articulation in patients where there is evidence of sufficient sound bone to seat and support the components. As part of post market vigilance, EUROS will collect data on EUROSCUP Fixe performances and safety
Assessment of the clinical performance and survivorship of the Corin Total Hip System with Trinity™ cup MetaFix™ Collared stem in a prospective study. The primary endpoint of the study is to evaluate the 3-year survivorship and clinical performance of the Corin Total Hip System using Trinity™ cup and MetaFix™ Collared stem. Additionally, the study follow up will continue until 10 years for subjects who consent to do.
EUROSSTEM is intended for use in primary and revision total hip replacement surgery. Hip replacement is intended to provide increased patient mobility and reduce pain by replacing the damages hip joint articulation in patients where there is evidence of sufficient sound bone to seat and support the components. As part of post market vigilance, EUROS will collect data on EUROSTEM performances and safety
This Post Market Clinical Follow-Up (PMCF) study to evaluate the performance and safety of the cemented TrendHip® stem in a prospective follow-up study with patients who underwent a hip arthroplasty with the investigational product (representative of usual clinical practice), at two follow-up examinations
In this pilot study, we will test the hypothesis that a POPOP for currently ineligible UAMS orthopedic surgery patients wanting hip or knee replacement improves markers of preoperative health, ability to reach a BMI threshold <40 kg/m2 required for surgical eligibility, and postoperative outcomes versus SOC.
The principal objective of this study is to compare mean 2-year subsidence of the ACTIS femoral stem using model-based RSA against published migration patterns for hip stems of a similar design. Secondary objectives include comparison of migration per surgical approach, quantifying changes in functional and health status of subjects following surgery, and assess occurrences of complications and adverse events.
The Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) is a common way to perform total hip arthroplasty. There are two main techniques to perform total hip replacement through the anterior approach. The first method is the "on-table" method, which uses a specialized surgical table, called a traction table. This table involves placing both feet in specialized boots that are then hooked up to the table, and allows for positioning of the operative leg with aid of the table. The major limitations associated with the traction table are the need for two additional staff members and the purchase of said table. The second method is the "off-table" method. In this method the patient is placed on a standard operating room table and the operative leg is manually positioned by the surgeon during the procedure . This obviates the need for the additional staff members or purchase of a specialized table. Both the "on-table" and "off-table" techniques are routinely used both worldwide and by our joint replacement specialists at Carilion Clinic. This study will aim to compare the efficiency and efficacy of performing the DAA for total hip arthroplasty utilizing either the "on-table" or "off- table" technique. Patients will be randomized to receive their total hip arthroplasty with either the "on- table" or "off-table" method.
The primary aim of this randomized controlled trial is to investigate the effectiveness of 12 weeks of progressive resistance training (PRT) compared to neuromuscular exercise (NEMEX) on functional performance in patients with hip OA measured by the 30-seconds chair stand test. Secondary aims are to investigate; the determinants of improvement in physical function following PRT or NEMEX; the effectiveness of booster sessions in prolonging the effects of the initial interventions (12 months), the cost-effectiveness of booster sessions (12 months). We will test the hypothesis that PRT is superior to NEMEX in improving physical function measured with the 30s sit-to-stand test at 12 week follow-up.
The current study is a multi-center study to assess precision and accuracy of the robotic system with new software.