Outcome
Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
Primary |
Feasibility - Number of Enrolled Participants |
Total number of participants who met all inclusion/exclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study |
18 months |
|
Primary |
Compliance - Percentage of Sessions Attended |
The percentage of exercise/counseling sessions attended (calculated as the number of sessions attended divided by the number of sessions prescribed multiplied by 100) |
6 months |
|
Primary |
Retention - Percentage of Participants Who Returned for Follow-up Testing |
The number of participants who returned for the 6-month follow-up visit divided by the total number of randomized participants multiplied by 100 |
6 months |
|
Secondary |
Body Weight |
Body weight measured in kg |
Baseline |
|
Secondary |
Body Weight |
Body weight measured in kg |
Months 3 and 6 |
|
Secondary |
6 Minute Walk (6MW) Test |
The 6MW test is a valid and reproducible measure of submaximal exercise capacity that reflects the level at which most activities of daily living are performed, predicts clinical events in cardiac patients, and is therefore a clinically meaningful outcome in cardiac rehabilitation studies. Participants were asked to walk at their own maximal pace on an established course, covering as much ground as they can during the allotted time, without running. Performance was measured by the total distance covered in meters. |
Baseline |
|
Secondary |
6 Minute Walk (6MW) Test |
The 6MW test is a valid and reproducible measure of submaximal exercise capacity that reflects the level at which most activities of daily living are performed, predicts clinical events in cardiac patients, and is therefore a clinically meaningful outcome in cardiac rehabilitation studies. Participants were asked to walk at their own maximal pace on an established course, covering as much ground as they can during the allotted time, without running. Performance was measured by the total distance covered in meters. |
Months 3 and 6 |
|
Secondary |
Grip Strength |
Grip strength was measured twice in each hand using an isometric hydraulic hand dynamometer. |
Baseline |
|
Secondary |
Grip Strength |
Grip strength was measured twice in each hand using an isometric hydraulic hand dynamometer. |
Months 3 and 6 |
|
Secondary |
Mobility - MAT-sf |
Mobility was assessed using the MAT-sf, a 10-item computer-based, self-administered assessment that uses animated video clips of 10 different tasks to illustrate various mobility-related challenges that cover a broad range of functioning. Participants provide an assessment of their ability to perform each task on the computer by clicking the appropriate response (yes/no, number of minutes, number of times). Scores range from 30 to 80, with higher scores indicative of better mobility. |
Baseline |
|
Secondary |
Mobility - MAT-sf |
Mobility was assessed using the MAT-sf, a 10-item computer-based, self-administered assessment that uses animated video clips of 10 different tasks to illustrate various mobility-related challenges that cover a broad range of functioning. Participants provide an assessment of their ability to perform each task on the computer by clicking the appropriate response (yes/no, number of minutes, number of times). Scores range from 30 to 80, with higher scores indicative of better mobility. |
Months 3 and 6 |
|
Secondary |
Expanded Short Physical Performance Battery (eSPPB) |
The expanded Short Physical Performance Battery (eSPPB) is a modified version of a widely used assessment of lower extremity physical function that consists of 3 standing balance tasks held for 10 seconds each (side-by-side, tandem and semi-tandem), two 4-m walk tests to assess usual gait speed, and 5 repeated chair stands. To minimize ceiling effects and maximize overall dispersion of test scores, the eSPPB increases the holding time of the semi- and full-tandem stands to 30 seconds and adds a single leg stand and a narrow walk test of balance (walking at usual pace within lines of tape spaced 20 cm apart). eSPPB scores are continuous and range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicative of better performance. |
Baseline |
|
Secondary |
Expanded Short Physical Performance Battery (eSPPB) |
The expanded Short Physical Performance Battery (eSPPB) is a modified version of a widely used assessment of lower extremity physical function that consists of 3 standing balance tasks held for 10 seconds each (side-by-side, tandem and semi-tandem), two 4-m walk tests to assess usual gait speed, and 5 repeated chair stands. To minimize ceiling effects and maximize overall dispersion of test scores, the eSPPB increases the holding time of the semi- and full-tandem stands to 30 seconds and adds a single leg stand and a narrow walk test of balance (walking at usual pace within lines of tape spaced 20 cm apart). eSPPB scores are continuous and range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicative of better performance. |
Months 3 and 6 |
|
Secondary |
Health-related Quality of Life SF-36 - Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score |
Health-related quality of life was assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36), a 36-item self-report measure with well-documented psychometric properties across a wide range of populations. All items are scored on a 0 to 100 range such that a high score defines a more favorable quality of life. The SF-36 generates eight subscale scores (general health perceptions; physical functioning; role limitations due to physical problems; bodily pain; mental health; role limitations due to emotional problems; vitality; and social functioning) which are generated by averaging items in the same subscale. The mental component summary (MCS) score is derived using a factor analysis technique that includes positive weights for the vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health scales and negative weights for the physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain and general health scales. |
Baseline |
|
Secondary |
Health-related Quality of Life SF-36 - Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score |
Health-related quality of life was assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36), a 36-item self-report measure with well-documented psychometric properties across a wide range of populations. All items are scored on a 0 to 100 range such that a high score defines a more favorable quality of life. The SF-36 generates eight subscale scores (general health perceptions; physical functioning; role limitations due to physical problems; bodily pain; mental health; role limitations due to emotional problems; vitality; and social functioning) which are generated by averaging items in the same subscale. The mental component summary (MCS) score is derived using a factor analysis technique that includes positive weights for the vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health scales and negative weights for the physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain and general health scales. |
Months 3 and 6 |
|
Secondary |
Health-related Quality of Life SF-36 - Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score |
Health-related quality of life was assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36), a 36-item self-report measure with well-documented psychometric properties across a wide range of populations. All items are scored on a 0 to 100 range such that a high score defines a more favorable quality of life. The SF-36 generates eight subscale scores (general health perceptions; physical functioning; role limitations due to physical problems; bodily pain; mental health; role limitations due to emotional problems; vitality; and social functioning) which are generated by averaging items in the same subscale. The physical component summary (PCS) score is derived using a factor analysis technique that includes positive weights for the physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health and vitality scales and negative weights for the social functioning, role-emotional and mental health scales. |
Baseline |
|
Secondary |
Health-related Quality of Life SF-36 - Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score |
Health-related quality of life was assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36), a 36-item self-report measure with well-documented psychometric properties across a wide range of populations. All items are scored on a 0 to 100 range such that a high score defines a more favorable quality of life. The SF-36 generates eight subscale scores (general health perceptions; physical functioning; role limitations due to physical problems; bodily pain; mental health; role limitations due to emotional problems; vitality; and social functioning) which are generated by averaging items in the same subscale. The physical component summary (PCS) score is derived using a factor analysis technique that includes positive weights for the physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health and vitality scales and negative weights for the social functioning, role-emotional and mental health scales. |
Months 3 and 6 |
|
Secondary |
Arterial Stiffness |
Arterial stiffness was assessed as carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV). Carotid-femoral PWV was measured in the supine position using the SphygmoCor XCEL system. PWV is calculated by dividing the distance between the carotid and femoral arteries by the pulse transit time. |
Baseline |
|
Secondary |
Arterial Stiffness |
Arterial stiffness was assessed as carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV). Carotid-femoral PWV was measured in the supine position using the SphygmoCor XCEL system. PWV is calculated by dividing the distance between the carotid and femoral arteries by the pulse transit time. |
Months 3 and 6 |
|
Secondary |
Brachial Blood Pressure - Systolic |
Brachial blood pressure was measured using a conventional mercury sphygmomanometer with the participant in a seated position after resting quietly for 5-10 minutes. |
Baseline |
|
Secondary |
Brachial Blood Pressure - Systolic |
Brachial blood pressure was measured using a conventional mercury sphygmomanometer with the participant in a seated position after resting quietly for 5-10 minutes. |
Months 3 and 6 |
|
Secondary |
Brachial Blood Pressure - Diastolic |
Brachial blood pressure was measured using a conventional mercury sphygmomanometer with the participant in a seated position after resting quietly for 5-10 minutes. |
Baseline |
|
Secondary |
Brachial Blood Pressure - Diastolic |
Brachial blood pressure was measured using a conventional mercury sphygmomanometer with the participant in a seated position after resting quietly for 5-10 minutes. |
Months 3 and 6 |
|
Secondary |
Aortic Blood Pressure - Systolic |
Aortic blood pressure was measured using the SphygmoCor XCEL system with the participant in the supine position after resting quietly for 5-10 minutes. |
Baseline |
|
Secondary |
Aortic Blood Pressure - Systolic |
Aortic blood pressure was measured using the SphygmoCor XCEL system with the participant in a supine position after resting quietly for 5-10 minutes. |
Months 3 and 6 |
|
Secondary |
Aortic Blood Pressure - Diastolic |
Aortic blood pressure was measured using the SphygmoCor XCEL system with the participant in a supine position after resting quietly for 5-10 minutes. |
Baseline |
|
Secondary |
Aortic Blood Pressure - Diastolic |
Aortic blood pressure was measured using the SphygmoCor XCEL system with the participant in a supine position after resting quietly for 5-10 minutes. |
Months 3 and 6 |
|
Secondary |
Hemoglobin A1c |
Hemoglobin A1c was measured in whole blood using a turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay. |
Baseline |
|
Secondary |
Hemoglobin A1c |
Hemoglobin A1c was measured in whole blood using a turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay. |
Months 3 and 6 |
|
Secondary |
Fasting Insulin |
Insulin was determined by a chemiluminescent immunoassay. |
Baseline |
|
Secondary |
Fasting Insulin |
Insulin was determined by a chemiluminescent immunoassay. |
Months 3 and 6 |
|