View clinical trials related to Obesity, Morbid.
Filter by:The goal of this cross-over study in obese subjects is to learn about the common co-morbidity type 2 diabetes and the local formation of ketone bodies. The type of study is an exploratory trial with the participants as own controls. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does food intake-induced ketogenesis exist in the small intestine of obese individuals? 2. Are insulin resistance, the incretin GLP-1 release and the glucose transporter SGLT1 affected in obese individuals without type 2 diabetes in the same way as those with type 2 diabetes?
Recent studies have shown that polarized training (i.e. the combination in the same session of intermittent high intensity exercise training, consisting of repeated, short-duration, high-intensity exercises on a cycle ergometer or a treadmill, and moderate exercise) can encourage the participation of obese people in body weight reduction programs, providing more dynamic exercises, less tiring and therefore more acceptable. To date, no data are available on the effects of polarized exercise in the rehabilitation of obese adolescents, who are often unwilling to engage in prolonged and monotonous motor activities. The demonstration that the polarized exercise might encourage the participation of obese adolescents in multidisciplinary body weight reduction programs, improve the cardiovascular capacity and also favor an adequate oxidation of lipids during the phase of exercise and post-exercise rest, could support its prescription in the programs of integrated metabolic rehabilitation of adolescent obesity.
Rationale: Weight loss therapies should aim to reduce fat mass while preserving both muscle mass and muscle strength. Consequently, there is a need for validated methods to measure muscle mass and strength. Current methods are either expensive and require trained technicians, or have not been validated in populations with class II/III obesity (BMI > 35 kg/m2). In our previous studies (MUST-MOP and MUSCLE study), we have validated the use of ultrasound (US) for the measurement of lean mass (a proxy for muscle mass) in a population with obesity. These studies showed that the use of US for the measurement of lean mass was feasible, reliable and valid. The aim of the current study is to validate the use of US for the measurement of lean mass after weight loss in a population of bariatric surgery patients. Objective: Primary objective: To assess the validity of US to measure lean mass after weight loss in a population of bariatric surgery patients. Secondary Objectives: - To assess de differences in lean mass between DXA and US in this study compared to the MUSCLE-study. - To assess how the lean mass has changed after bariatric surgery and the effects of lean mass on total weight loss and resolution of comorbidities - To assess whether the change in lean mass has an effect on serum levels of markers for muscle mass. Study design: This study is an observational follow-up study of the MUSCLE study and will take place in the Centre Obesity Northern-Netherlands (CON) at the Medical Centre Leeuwarden (MCL). Study population: The population will consists of participants, who have participated in the MUSCLE study and have received bariatric surgery at the CON / MCL. Main study parameters/endpoints: The main parameters of this study are: lean mass measured by DXA and US. The main endpoint of this study is the validity of the US measurement of lean mass compared to DXA. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: There are no direct benefits for the participants. However, the results of this study can help to further validate the ultrasound as a cheaper and more accessible method to measure muscle mass. This can potentially be used in standard clinical care to assess muscle mass of patients during weight loss. • The additional time investment: during first year follow-up appointment approximately 30 minutes. The risks of most test are minor, even the small amount of radiation exposure, which means the risks and burden of this study outweigh the potentially obtainable knowledge.
Gastric myotomy has been performed for several years as a means of addressing chronic stenosis after sleeve gastrectomy and treating gastroparesis. The Pylorus Sparing Antral Myotomy (PSAM) technique has the opposite effect by leaving the pylorus intact and extending the myotomy proximally to the distal gastric body. PSAM was initially combined with ESG and shown to delay gastric emptying and provide greater weight loss without impacting tolerability (GCSI score) or the safety profile of the procedure (2 DDW GEM abstracts). PSAM has not been evaluated alone, without concomitant ESG. Since delayed gastric emptying alone is known to promote weight loss, it is thought that PSAM alone (without ESG) may provide similar efficacy, while reducing procedure time and adverse events. There have been no clinical studies that investigate the efficacy of PSAM independent of ESG. This pilot study aims to address this lack of information by evaluating the safety, tolerability, and short-term efficacy of PSAM, in addition to exploring its impact on gastric physiology. This will also provide data that may be used in designing a larger clinical trial.
The purpose of this study is to compare two methods for managing obesity in rural primary care patients. The first method includes quarterly 1:1 meetings with the participant and their primary care provider and the second includes a group lifestyle intervention over Zoom paired with quarterly team meetings with the participant, their primary care provider and their lifestyle coach, the coach joining via Zoom. Investigators will evaluate which method is best at helping participants lose weight over 18 months.
In patients with severe obesity, bariatric surgery provides consistent and long-term weight loss. BMI ≥50kg / m2 is an independent factor of increased morbidity / mortality in bariatric surgery compared with patients weighing less than 50 kg / m2 (1.2% and 0.8%) mainly due to technical difficulties. Preoperative weight loss reduces this morbidity / mortality. Recent studies have shown that blocking blood vessels to a particular portion of the stomach (bariatric or left gastric artery embolization) can temporarily decrease levels of the appetite inducing hormone ghrelin, and result in weight loss. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the association bariatric embolization before sleeve gastrectomy in super obese patients.
SaCo videolaryngeal mask airway is a novel third generation supraglottic device allowing for continuous observation of entrance to larynx via inserted in special channel videoscope connected with cable with external monitor. In obese patients airway management can be difficult so use of new devices that improve safety and potentially efficacy of airway management is indicated. In prospective observational study the SaCo VLM will be evaluated in terms of maintaining airway patency and effectiveness of intubation through it's lumen in morbidly obese scheduled for elective general surgery under general anesthesia.
The goal of this Randomized Clinical trial is to to investigate if the use of Air Pressure Release Ventilation in morbidly obese patients undergoing open heart surgery will improve post operative pulmonary outcomes 60 Patients will be randomized into two groups according to the mode of ventilation used into: Group A: airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) group (30 Patients) Group B: Standard (control) group (30 Patients) Post-operatively, Patients will be ventilated with conventional Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation (SIMV) volume control mode
The worldwide obesity epidemic has led to an increase in the proportion of patients with chronic liver disease due to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and in the prevalence of obesity in patients with cirrhosis of all etiologies. The reported prevalence of obesity in patients with cirrhosis is of 30% which appears similar to that of the general population. Bariatric surgery is currently considered as the most effective and durable means for the management of morbid obesity as it is associated with the remission and/or improvement of many obesity associated comorbidities as well as improved quality and expectancy of life. However, the surgical risk is increased compared to individuals without cirrhosis, and determining the risk/benefit ratio of bariatric surgery in the setting of cirrhosis is a complex task further hampered by the lack of randomized controlled trials. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample study reported a slightly increased rate of mortality of bariatric surgery in the setting of compensated cirrhosis compared to individuals without cirrhosis (0.9% vs 0.3%). Interestingly, this risk was as high as 16.3% in individuals with decompensated cirrhosis (16.3%). However, this study has been published more than 10 years ago and the mortality of bariatric surgery has decreased significantly and is around 0.1%. Furthermore, the introduction of transient elastography in clinical practice has allowed the early identification of patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) at risk of developing clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). A few series including a limited number of patients have been published indicating that CSPH should not be considered as a formal contraindication for bariatric surgery. This study is meant to assess the outcomes of bariatric surgery in patients with morbid obesity and compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) (currently synonymous of the term "compensated cirrhosis'') associated with clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) in a large multicentric, multinational series.
The aim of this study is to compare the possible efficacy of ondansetron and gabapentin on postoperative nausea and vomiting in patient with morbid obesity who will undergo laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.