View clinical trials related to Motor Imagery.
Filter by:The principal aim of this study was to asses the effects of motor imagery and action observation training on ventilatory and functional capacity through a randomized controlled trial.
About 50% of stroke patients are unable to live independently because of residual disability. Brain-computer interface (BCI) is based on closed-loop theory, which facilitates neurological remodeling by establishing a bridge between central and peripheral connections. Studies have confirmed that BCI real-time neurofeedback training system based on motor imagery alone can effectively improve patients' motor function. So, is the benefit greater if motor imagery is combined with motor execution? Current conclusions are mixed. In addition, previous studies and our preliminary study found that prefrontal Fp1 and Fp2 areas play an important role in motor recovery after stroke, and they are involved in motor imagery, motor execution, attention and other behavioral processes. Therefore, we designed a BCI training system based on motor imagery and motor execution with prefrontal electroencephalogram (EEG) signals as the modulatory target. This was a randomized placebo-controlled double-blinded clinical trial. Patients in the test group performed BCI-controlled upper extremity motor imagery + upper extremity pedaling training. The control group had the same equipment and training scenario, and patients were also asked to imagine the upper extremity pedaling movement with effort, and patients also wore EEG caps, but the EEG signals were only recorded without controlling the pedaling equipment. After 3 weeks of treatment, we observed the changes of motor and cognitive functions as well as fNIRS-related brain network characteristics in both groups.
This study will investigate if the use of motor imagery to practice a balance task is as effective as physically practicing balance tasks as measured by the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) in persons with MS. A secondary purpose is to investigate if using a motor imagery balance intervention will limit fatigue typically experienced with physical movement in this population.
The aim of our study is to compare the effectiveness of the supervized pulmonary telerehabilitation program and the cognitive telerehabilitation method, which includes pulmonary telerehabilitation methods, in patients with severe stage COPD who have difficulty exercising heavily. The effects of pulmonary and cognitive rehabilitation on dyspnea, muscle strength, functional capacity, quality of life, anxiety and depression levels in this patient group will be examined. The number of studies in the literature in which the pulmonary rehabilitation program was applied as telerehabilitation is insufficient. Considering that this patient group is not motivated and has difficulty in exercising, motor imagery and movement observation methods from cognitive rehabilitation methods may be alternative methods for these patients. Although these methods have been very popular in recent years in terms of researching and demonstrating their effectiveness in various patient groups in the literature, no study has been found in which the effects of these methods have been applied in pulmonary disease groups. This study aims to contribute to the serious gap in the literature on the application of pulmonary telerehabilitation and its effectiveness, and to be an original study by investigating the effectiveness of motor imagery and action observation, which are popular rehabilitation methods of recent years, in COPD patients in the pulmonary disease group for the first time.
The primary aim of this study is to investigate the effect of motor imagery training as an additional tool in the rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Therefore, ACLR patients will be recruited and randomly assigned into one of following groups: - Experimental group: Classic rehabilitation + Motor imagery training - Control group: Classic rehabilitation Both, the control and experimental group, will be submitted to a routine physiotherapy program after ACLR. In addition, the intervention group will be exposed to motor imagery training at three different time periods during the rehabilitation process (MI 1: immediately postoperative; MI 2: return to run; MI 3: change of direction). All participants will be invited for a preoperative screening, several postoperative screenings at 4-week time intervals and a final return to sport screening. At these test moments, participants will be subjected to a specific test battery consisting of subjective and objective clinical parameters. The subjective outcomes imply the patient's perception of pain and discomfort, level of participation, psychosocial well-being and overall quality of life. The objective clinical outcome measures relate to knee mobility and muscle strength, level of functioning/performance capacity and the detection of brain areas and networks involved in the processes of anxiety and worrying using EEG.
Low back pain is a common problem in society and causes loss of workforce. Its lifetime prevalence reaches 80% and annual hospital admission rates in the adult population reach 15%.Most studies on motor imagery suggested the effects of motor imagery are related to neuroplastic changes in the brain. Studies have shown that similar brain regions are activated during motor imagery and real movement. However, the level of evidence about the effect of motor imagery on autonomic functions is limited. Today, interest in telerehabilitation has increased due to the Covid-19 pandemic. The aim of this study is to examine the effects of telerehabilitation-based motor imagery training in patients with non-specific low back pain.
Temporomandibular disorder (TMD) is the symptomatic expression of a muscular or an articular impairment at the manducatory tract. TMD affects between 30 to 65% of the population with a higher prevalence for young women. The patients with DTM report a decrease of their personal, social and professional quality of life. Treatment usually relies on physical therapy. Among the different technics that can be used in physical therapy, there is growing evidence advocating the efficacy of using motor imagery (i.e. imagining a movement with no concomitant physical execution) during rehabilitation. It has also been shown that the benefits of practicing motor imagery depend on the ability (i.e., the higher the ability, the greater the benefits). However, there is no investigation of the motor imagery ability of the tongue and mouth movements conditioning the use of motor imagery during TMD rehabilitation. The objective of the study is to investigate the ability of imagining tongue and mouth movements using the Tongue and Mouth Imagery Questionnaire (TMIQ) as compare to the gold-standard Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ - Malouin et al., 2007).