View clinical trials related to Knee Osteoarthritis.
Filter by:This study is a randomized controlled clinical trial using a blind evaluator. Fifty-one volunteers were selected from 50 years to 70 years, obeying the following criteria: diagnosis of knee OA grade II and III through the radiographic classification of Kellgreen and Lawrence 1955, Body mass index (BMI) less than 40 kg / m², volunteers should have had knee pain for at least six months. All are from the Rehabilitation Sector of Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo (ISCMSP). The subjects were evaluated through a questionnaire developed by the authors of the study (Annex I), the Visual Analogue Scale (EVA) (Annex II), then applied to the Lower Extremity Functional Scale LEFS (Appendix III) and the Activities of daily living scale ADLs (Annex IV). In addition, the evaluation of muscular strength was through dynamometry using the Lafayete dynamometer model 01163, which was performed by a blind evaluator regarding the group that will belong to each candidate. The muscles tested were: quadriceps, ischiostibial and gluteus maximus. The randomization was through 60 brown envelopes divided into A, B, C and D, designating the randomness of the sample. In addition to the initial evaluation, an evaluation was performed at the end of the tenth session and after 3 months of treatment. The volunteers underwent a five-week treatment program, totaling 10 sessions, divided into four groups, group A - Intervention (INT) underwent knee and hip muscle strengthening exercises and electromagnetic field therapy with (Meditea - ARG) using the coplanar technique, group B - Exercises (EXE) carried out exercises to strengthen the hip and knee muscles in the C - Placebo group (PLA). hip and knee and electromagnetic field therapy with the Magnetron® coplanar technique, but with the device switched off and group D - Apparatus (APA) only use electromagnetic field therapy with the magnetron® coplanar technique. In the present study, there were no significant differences between groups regarding pain, function and muscle strength. However, group A obtained better results in the evaluated criteria, tending that the combination PEMF and exercises, is an indicated treatment for OA knee.
Pilot, open non-controlled trial to assess the feasibility of implementing objective parameters as primary endpoints in a clinical trial with patients affected by knee osteoarthritis.
Extension study to Cingal 16-02 to obtain 39-week safety and efficacy follow-up data
A retrospective one-time evaluation of total knee patients one year or more postoperative, to compare antero-posterior (AP) stability with the TELOS Stress device/stress x-rays and clinical outcomes. Multiple implant brand/models will be included in the study.
The overall aim of this study is to develop an evidence based exercise programme for the management of knee osteoarthritis which is feasible and acceptable to patients and healthcare professionals in Malaysia. The chosen programme was identified through a systematic literature search and is the programme developed by Hurley et al. in 2007. This programme will be evaluated through mixed-methods sequential exploratory design research study guided by the United Kingdom (UK) Medical Research Council guidance and framework. It involves two phases of data collection. The first phase (already completed) comprised a qualitative study aimed at exploring the beliefs and attitudes of Malaysian people that would need to be taken into account when adapting the evidence based ESCAPE-pain (acronym for 'Enabling Self-management and Coping with Arthritic pain using Exercise) programme for implementation in the context of Malaysian healthcare system. The second phase will be conducted to evaluate the feasibility of trialling ESCAPE-pain programme in Malaysia.
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) causes patients considerable joint pain and leads to instability, reduced range of motion, and functional limitations. Current treatment limitations have generated interest in alternative options to restore function and alleviate joint pain, some with the aim of healing damaged articular cartilage. There has been preliminary support in the literature for reduced pain and improved functional performance in patients who receive mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) as part of a treatment regimen. MSCs can be costly and are limited by complex regulatory issues. This interest in an alternative isolation method lead to the development of Lipogems. Lipogems is a technique to harvest, process, and inject minimally manipulated adipose tissue. This procedure is enzyme free and requires no clonal expansion or manipulation. The goal of this study is to evaluate the possible benefits of reduced joint pain and increased joint functionality in patients with knee osteoarthritis after the injection of Lipogems. In addition, given the limitations of prior research on the efficacy of intra-articular corticosteroids, the investigators will also include this as an additional study group to compare to placebo. There have been case reports published showing favorable outcomes. This would be the first study reporting data on the efficacy of Lipogems for pain relief in knee OA in a randomized, controlled clinical trial with a larger sample of patients. The investigators hypothesize that patients who receive an injection of Lipogems will experience a decrease in pain of the affected knee and an increase in joint functionality in comparison to placebo. The investigators also hypothesize that patients who receive an intra-articular corticosteroid will experience decreased pain or improved functionality in the affected joint compared to placebo.
This study compares two oral medications (tranexamic acid and aminocaproic acid) as hemostatic agent administered in patients undergoing total knee replacement.
Previous retrospective database studies suggest that total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery under spinal anesthesia has less complications than when performed under general anesthesia. In general, complications are rare and both anesthesia types are widely accepted. In Finland, total knee arthroplasty has typically been performed under spinal anesthesia. In a recent prospective randomized controlled study, total knee arthroplasty under general anesthesia resulted in less acute postoperative pain (opioid-need measured by patient-controlled anesthesia), less nausea, and faster hospital discharge than that performed under spinal anesthesia. Also the use of surgical tourniquet can affect surgical outcome: it may reduce bleeding and surgery time, but it may also cause weakness of thigh muscles and thus hinder mobilization. In a recent study, both techniques with and without surgical tourniquet appeared equal. The aims of this study are to compare total knee arthroplasty under spinal or general anesthesia, with or without surgical tourniquet, in relation to acute and chronic postoperative pain, nausea, knee function, patient reported quality of life and satisfaction on care, complications, length of stay, and need of surgical unit resources. This randomized controlled study includes 400 patients with informed consent, 18-75-years-of-age, standard primary total knee arthroplasty operation, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status classification I-III, body mass index under 40, and no contraindications for medications or treatments used. The hypothesis of this study are used to reassess best practices of primary total knee arthroplasty operation to enhance quality of care, patient outcomes and satisfaction, and availability of surgery due to better patient flow at surgical unit.
The purpose of this study is to learn if using an Interspace between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee (iPACK) injection technique (also called a "nerve block") that numbs the nerves going to the back part of the knee to aid in physical therapy after surgery. The iPACK technique uses a numbing solution (local anesthetics) that is injected behind the knee to reduce pain and to help straighten the knee. This block may affect movement in the leg and make the legs weak, but thing is rare. A few institutions use the iPACK block for patients having total knee replacements, with the hope of providing good pain relief combined with improved mobility after surgery.
Physical inactivity is a major risk behaviour with a potential for causing premature death, particularly among people with mobility limitations, such as knee osteoarthritis. Digital motivational interventions (such as SMS) can motive to a healthy behaviour including increased physical activity. The purpose of this study is to investigate if motivational text messages following an exercise intervention to improve mobility limitations will change the physical activity level in patients with knee osteoarthritis. This study is designed as pilot randomized controlled trial, with equal randomization (1:1). Eligible participants will be randomised into one of two groups (intervention or control) after completing their baseline measurements. The intervention group will receive weekly motivational text messages and the control group will not receive any attention from the study.