View clinical trials related to Intracranial Hemorrhages.
Filter by:Older people falling from a standing height is the most common cause of hospital admission for head injury. Up to 1 in 3 patients admitted are taking a tablet medication which thins the blood, known as an oral anticoagulant. This type of medication can increase the likelihood of bleeding in the brain. Many patients are taking oral anticoagulation due to having an irregular heartbeat (called atrial fibrillation) or because of having a previous stroke or blood clots. When a scan shows blood in the brain, oral anticoagulation is nearly always stopped. However, this leaves the question of when it is safe to restart them. The risk of making the bleeding in the brain worse must be balanced against the risk of having a stroke or blood clots. There is no clear evidence on the safest time to restart oral anticoagulation, but most neurosurgeons advise restarting them 1-4 weeks after head injury. The number of people who have a bleed on their brain after a head injury is increasing and further brain bleeding or a stroke can have a serious effect on patients' lives and their on-going healthcare needs. Public and patient groups have highlighted that many patients want to stop taking oral anticoagulation after a bleed but they may be unaware of the vital importance of restarting this medication to prevent strokes and blood clots. The most popular oral anticoagulation prescribed has changed in recent years from warfarin to newer medications called Direct Oral Anti-Coagulants (DOACs). This trial will recruit 1084 people who are admitted to hospital with a bleed on the brain caused by a head injury who were taking oral anticoagulation before their head injury and have been prescribed a Direct Oral Anti-Coagulant (DOAC) for previously diagnosed medical condition. Patients on other Oral Anti-Coagulants, such as Warfarin may also be able to take part. The main purpose of the trial is to determine when is most beneficial time for people to start or restart a DOAC after their head injury. People will be asked to start the medication either 1 week or 4 weeks after their head injury. They will be then followed closely for 12 weeks and any major bleeding events or a blood clots (thrombotic events) such as a stroke or heart attack will be recorded. The study will also look at the person's overall quality of life, how they recover physically, the number of people who die, the costs of the treatment, and the attitudes of people and their caregivers to starting or restarting a DOAC.
The goal of this observational study is to train a machine learning system based on data from patients affected by spontaneous Intracranial Hemorrage. The main question it aims to answer is whether there is a correlation between actual clinical pratice, reached outcomes and favorable or unfavorable predictive factors, and anamnesis. Participants will be treated as per standard clinical practice.
To establish a predictive model and scoring system for predicting severe complications after thrombectomy. This scoring system can be used to identify high-risk patients after endovascular thrombectomy, guide the early use of adjunctive interventions, and provide reference for future clinical trials.
Patients with acute severe brain injury are usually admitted to the Intensive Care Unit. A substantial proportion of these patients will have disorders of consciousness (DOC) after interruption of sedation. It is difficult to reliably predict neurological outcome in these patients. Dependent on the extent of permanently damaged brain areas, DOC in patients with acute severe brain injury may improve or persist, eventually evolving into a minimal conscious state (MCS) or unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS). These conditions are accompanied by long term severe disability. In current practice, the decision to withdraw life-sustaining support is made by interpreting the results of repeated bedside neurological examination and conventional CT-brain imaging. Reliable identification of patients with a possible good outcome, in whom treatment should not be withdrawn, is difficult. In this prospective observational cohort study we aim to identify patients with a good neurological outcome.
Descriptive observational study in patients with spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage or following aneurysmal rupture to assess the presence of a post-HSA syndrome at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year, and its impact on functional outcome using the Rivermead questionnaire
Investigators propose a research design protocol to evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture in improving function recovery after acute intracranial hemorrhage.
The non-neurosurgical management of post-traumatic cerebral hemorrhagic lesions is currently poorly codified. It consists of neurological monitoring for 24 to 48 hours, and the performance of an almost systematic brain scan. Anti-aggregation and anticoagulation treatments are stopped for 14 to 28 days and should be resumed according to the risk-benefit ratio and the advice of the patient's treating physicians and cardiologists. If the bleeding lesions do not progress, the patients are allowed to return home. If the lesions progress, the patients remain hospitalized for further monitoring, a new brain scan and neurosurgical advice. This study seeks to show that the performance of systematic brain imaging in the absence of clinical deterioration of patients admitted to the UHCD for post-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage could be avoided, and thus to administer an unnecessary dose of irradiation to the patients, and would also have a significant financial stake. Several recent studies have shown that there is no need to perform a follow-up brain scan in the absence of neurological deterioration, even in anticoagulated patients or those on antiplatelet drugs. Despite the growing number of articles, no recommendation or consensus has been proposed.
Oral anticoagulant therapy, including factors Xa and 2a inhibitors has become more popular in recent years due to its efficacy and convenience in preventing thrombotic events and reducing the risk for stroke in patients with rosk factors (e.g. atrial fibrillation, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism). These drugs have replaced traditional therapies such as warfarin, which requires frequent dose adjustments and control blood samples. Warfarin also has a higher risk of bleeding events. Many patients with atrial fibrillation, particularly old patients and those with comorbidities may have trouble achieving the dose and control requirements for warfarin therapy. On the other hand, Direct Oral Anticoagulant therapies do not require a close monitorization and have a lower risk of bleeding events, which makes them a more attractive option for many patients. There is solid evidence behind the efficacy and safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulant therapies. Multiple clinical trials have demonstrated that Factor Xa inhibitors like rivaroxaban and apixaban are as effective as warfarin in preventing blood clots and reducing stroke risk in patients living with atrial fibrillation. These challenges remark the need for new research that can improve our comprehension about the risk of bleeding associated to anticoagulant therapies and develop novel and more effective strategies for minimizing this risk. Hence, an observational analysis about anticoagulant-associated intracranial hemorrhage may help identifying its incidence and prevalence, as well as treatment patterns and identifying any patient with risk factors linked to these events. This information can be used to improve patient outcomes and guide future research. Work Hypothesis: The majority of intracranial hemorrhage events are associated with heparin, low molecular weight heparin and warfarin instead of Factor Xa inhibitors or direct thrombin inhibitors. Nevertheless, the growing use in recent years of factor Xa inhibitors can increase the number of this therapy related bleeding events.
Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) can occur due to traumatic and spontaneous events.1 The incidence of non-traumatic, spontaneous ICH is approximately 40,000 to 67,000 cases per year while the incidence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) is nearly 1.7 million annually
The goal of this clinical trial is to explore the effect of FDA-approved antiseizure drugs in the brain connectivity patterns of severe acute brain injury patients with suppression of consciousness. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Does the antiseizure medication reduce the functional connectivity of seizure networks, as identified by resting state functional MRI (rs-fMRI), within this specific target population? - What is the prevalence of seizure networks in patients from the target population, both with EEG suggestive and not suggestive of epileptogenic activity? Participants will have a rs-fMRI and those with seizure networks will receive treatment with two antiseizure medications and a post-treatment rs-fMRI. Researchers will compare the pretreatment and post-treatment rs-fMRIs to see if there are changes in the participant's functional connectivity including seizure networks and typical resting state networks.