View clinical trials related to Intracranial Hemorrhages.
Filter by:This trial is a clinical prospective observational study. Cases meeting the entry criteria undergo near-infrared spectroscopy(NIRS）detection. Data collection mainly includes hematoma thickness on cranial CT, and bilateral NIRS data.This trial tries to explore the reliability and accuracy of NIRS detection of subcranial hematoma.
The goal of this observational study is to develop and validate a clinical tool to predict which adolescents aged 11 to less than 18 years of age with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) are at an increased risk for developing significant new or worsening mental health conditions. The main aims the study wish to answer are: - Does the adolescent have new or worsening depression or anxiety defined as a change from their previous medical history using self-reported questionnaires at either one or three months post-injury? - Does the adolescent have unmet mental health care needs, defined as not receiving any mental or behavior health care in patients with new or worsening anxiety or depression as defined by the self reported questionnaires? Participants will be enrolled after being diagnosed in the emergency department (ED) with an mTBI. During the ED visit, the child's parent/caregiver and the adolescent will complete several questionnaires related to mental health which include tools to measure anxiety and depression. Participants will be asked to complete these questionnaires again at 1 month and 3 months post enrollment.
The goal of this observational study is to train a machine learning system based on data from patients affected by spontaneous Intracranial Hemorrage. The main question it aims to answer is whether there is a correlation between actual clinical pratice, reached outcomes and favorable or unfavorable predictive factors, and anamnesis. Participants will be treated as per standard clinical practice.
Patients with acute severe brain injury are usually admitted to the Intensive Care Unit. A substantial proportion of these patients will have disorders of consciousness (DOC) after interruption of sedation. It is difficult to reliably predict neurological outcome in these patients. Dependent on the extent of permanently damaged brain areas, DOC in patients with acute severe brain injury may improve or persist, eventually evolving into a minimal conscious state (MCS) or unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS). These conditions are accompanied by long term severe disability. In current practice, the decision to withdraw life-sustaining support is made by interpreting the results of repeated bedside neurological examination and conventional CT-brain imaging. Reliable identification of patients with a possible good outcome, in whom treatment should not be withdrawn, is difficult. In this prospective observational cohort study we aim to identify patients with a good neurological outcome.
Investigators propose a research design protocol to evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture in improving function recovery after acute intracranial hemorrhage.
The non-neurosurgical management of post-traumatic cerebral hemorrhagic lesions is currently poorly codified. It consists of neurological monitoring for 24 to 48 hours, and the performance of an almost systematic brain scan. Anti-aggregation and anticoagulation treatments are stopped for 14 to 28 days and should be resumed according to the risk-benefit ratio and the advice of the patient's treating physicians and cardiologists. If the bleeding lesions do not progress, the patients are allowed to return home. If the lesions progress, the patients remain hospitalized for further monitoring, a new brain scan and neurosurgical advice. This study seeks to show that the performance of systematic brain imaging in the absence of clinical deterioration of patients admitted to the UHCD for post-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage could be avoided, and thus to administer an unnecessary dose of irradiation to the patients, and would also have a significant financial stake. Several recent studies have shown that there is no need to perform a follow-up brain scan in the absence of neurological deterioration, even in anticoagulated patients or those on antiplatelet drugs. Despite the growing number of articles, no recommendation or consensus has been proposed.
Oral anticoagulant therapy, including factors Xa and 2a inhibitors has become more popular in recent years due to its efficacy and convenience in preventing thrombotic events and reducing the risk for stroke in patients with rosk factors (e.g. atrial fibrillation, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism). These drugs have replaced traditional therapies such as warfarin, which requires frequent dose adjustments and control blood samples. Warfarin also has a higher risk of bleeding events. Many patients with atrial fibrillation, particularly old patients and those with comorbidities may have trouble achieving the dose and control requirements for warfarin therapy. On the other hand, Direct Oral Anticoagulant therapies do not require a close monitorization and have a lower risk of bleeding events, which makes them a more attractive option for many patients. There is solid evidence behind the efficacy and safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulant therapies. Multiple clinical trials have demonstrated that Factor Xa inhibitors like rivaroxaban and apixaban are as effective as warfarin in preventing blood clots and reducing stroke risk in patients living with atrial fibrillation. These challenges remark the need for new research that can improve our comprehension about the risk of bleeding associated to anticoagulant therapies and develop novel and more effective strategies for minimizing this risk. Hence, an observational analysis about anticoagulant-associated intracranial hemorrhage may help identifying its incidence and prevalence, as well as treatment patterns and identifying any patient with risk factors linked to these events. This information can be used to improve patient outcomes and guide future research. Work Hypothesis: The majority of intracranial hemorrhage events are associated with heparin, low molecular weight heparin and warfarin instead of Factor Xa inhibitors or direct thrombin inhibitors. Nevertheless, the growing use in recent years of factor Xa inhibitors can increase the number of this therapy related bleeding events.
Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) can occur due to traumatic and spontaneous events.1 The incidence of non-traumatic, spontaneous ICH is approximately 40,000 to 67,000 cases per year while the incidence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) is nearly 1.7 million annually
The goal of this clinical trial is to explore the effect of FDA-approved antiseizure drugs in the brain connectivity patterns of severe and moderate acute brain injury patients with suppression of consciousness. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Does the antiseizure medication reduce the functional connectivity of seizure networks, as identified by resting state functional MRI (rs-fMRI), within this specific target population? - What is the prevalence of seizure networks in patients from the target population, both with EEG suggestive and not suggestive of epileptogenic activity? Participants will have a rs-fMRI and those with seizure networks will receive treatment with two antiseizure medications and a post-treatment rs-fMRI. Researchers will compare the pretreatment and post-treatment rs-fMRIs to see if there are changes in the participant's functional connectivity including seizure networks and typical resting state networks.
Non-Contrast Computed Tomography (NCCT) of the head is the most common imaging method used to assess patients attending the Emergency Department (ED) with a wide range of significant neurological presentations including trauma, stroke, seizure and reduced consciousness. Rapid review of the images supports clinical decision-making including treatment and onward referral. Radiologists, those reporting scans, often have significant backlogs and are unable to prioritise abnormal images of patients with time critical abnormalities. Similarly, identification of normal scans would support patient turnover in ED with significant waits and pressure on resources. To address this problem, Qure.AI has worked to develop the market approved qER algorithm, which is a software program that can analyse CT head to identify presence of abnormalities supporting workflow prioritisation. This study will trial the software in 4 NHS hospitals across the UK to evaluate the ability of the software to reduce the turnaround time of reporting scans with abnormalities that need to be prioritised.