View clinical trials related to Gingival Recession.
Filter by:The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the avascular root surface area as a prognostic identification criterion for gingival recessions and to compare the predictive value of the Miller classification and avascular root surface area (AERSA) calculation on the final root coverage outcomes.
Is PriMatrix wound dressing capable of regenerating gum tissue inside the mouth?
Smoking has a negative effect on the predictability and stability of root coverage procedures because of decreased blood supply and fibroblast activity. Long-term evaluation of this procedure in smokers is important for clinical decision making, because it provides information about the stability of results over time. In smokers, enamel matrix derivative (EMD) used at acellular dermal matrix graft (ADMG)/ soft tissue interface could be an alternative to improve the deficient healing potential, since EMD has the capability of stimulating angiogenesis. At the ADMG/ root surface interface, it could improve the deficient fibroblast activity in smokers and therefore reduce the presence of a long junctional epithelium. The aim of this randomised controlled clinical study was to investigate whether EMD contributes to the root coverage of gingival recessions performed with ADMG in smokers during a 12-month follow-up. Twenty smokers with bilateral Miller Class I or II gingival recessions ≥ 3 mm will be selected. The test group will be treated with an association of ADMG and EMD, and the control group with ADMG alone. Some clinical parameters as: probing depth, relative clinical attachment level, gingival recession height, gingival recession width, keratinized tissue width and keratinized tissue thickness will be evaluated before surgery and after twelve months.
Gingival recessions are often successfully treated by coronally advanced flap technique (CAF) associated with subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTG). Currently the xenogeneic collagen matrix (CM) has been used as a substitute for SCTG associated with CAF technique for root coverage. CAF technique was not developed for use with CM and has shown limited results when applied to the CM. The aim of this study was to compare and show the benefits of the extended flap technique (EFT) compared to CAF technique using CM for root coverage.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 6-month outcomes of applying low-intensity laser therapy associated with connective tissue grafts to treat gingival recession.
The aim of this randomized controlled clinical study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of platelet rich fibrin (PRF) and connective tissue grafts in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of total root coverage between two coronally positioned flap technique in Miller recession Class I and II, in patients attending at "Universidad El Bosque" dental school clinics.
The present study deals with treatment of localized gingival recessions. The hypothesis of this study is that platelet rich fibrin can be used an alternative to subepithelial connective tissue graft in the coverage of denuded roots. If the platelet rich fibrin will prove to be similarly effective as subepithelial connective tissue graft, it will be possible to avoid a donor site and to decrease patient discomfort after operation.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the incidence of gingival fissures according to the type of brush used, soft and medium.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Gintuit compared to a free autogenous graft using donor tissue harvested from the subject's palate in the treatment of subjects who have an insufficient zone of attached gingiva associated with at least two non adjacent teeth. The trial is designed to demonstrate non-inferiority between treatment and control in the change in amount of attached gingiva over the 6 month observation period. Gintuit will be placed as a graft in one of the deficient zones, and a free autogenous graft will be placed in the other. The grafts will be evaluated clinically to determine the change in the amount of attached gingiva and on at least three subjects, a small biopsy will be taken to allow histologic evaluation and comparison of both grafts.