View clinical trials related to Gingival Recession.
Filter by:Gingival recession is a clinical problem that increases with age and affects patient comfort. It is defined as the displacement of the gingival margin to a more apical position of the cementum-enamel border of the tooth. Coronally advanced flap (CAF) or tunnel technique (TUN) with subepithelial connective tissue procedures have been reported to be the most predictable methods of single gingival recession treatments. The ultimate goal of these plastic periodontal surgical procedures is to close the exposed root surface and achieve optimum aesthetic results. The main indications for root coverage (RC) procedures are aesthetic concern, root hypersensitivity, prevention of cervical abrasion and root caries, improvement of restorative results, and facilitation of plaque control. The use of a subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCGT) combined with a coronally positioned flap is considered the gold standard by many authors for single gingival recession treatments. De-epithelialization of free gingival grafts (DGG) has been proposed, especially when palatal tissue thickness is insufficient (≤2.5 mm) and larger graft size in the apico-coronal or mesio-distal directions is required. In this technique, the graft of the required width and length is separated from the lateral side of the palate, and then the 0.3-0.5 mm thick epithelial layer of the resulting graft is cut from the connective tissue layer. Ultrasonography (USG) is based on the principle of recording data obtained as a result of ultrasound waves sent with the help of a probe hitting and reflecting on substances of different densities. This technique is widely used in medical practice. In dentistry, the USG method is used to measure the alveolar bone level and the dimensions of the periodontium to evaluate the gingival thickness. It also has functions to evaluate color power and color speed, as well as blood flow. The study hypothesizes that combining SCGT and DGG with a coronally positioned flap could yield different clinical outcomes in patients with a single buccal gingival recession. This study aims to compare the clinical success of connective tissue grafts obtained by two different surgical methods in covering the root surface with ultrasonography (USG).
Microsurgical coronally advanced tunnel procedures using subepithelial connective tissue grafts (sCTG) are predictable for healing of multiple adjacent type 1 and 2 gingival recessions (RT1 and RT2). In order to reduce patient morbidity and enhance periodontal wound healing with sCTG can be used. The aim of this study is to compare the results of the modified tunneling technique with subepithelial connective tissue graft in gingival recessions placed with the inner side towards the flap cover graft and the outer side towards the flap cover graft.
A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial will be conducted with 24 individuals aged 18 or older, who are periodontally healthy and require root coverage in bilateral multiple RT1-type recessions involving at least two teeth on each side of the mouth. The number of teeth to be covered must be equal on both sides to avoid imbalance in patient-centered comparisons. Patients included in the study will undergo the bilateral multiple root coverage technique with coronally repositioned flap (Zucchelli and De Sanctis) in both groups. The donor areas for connective tissue will be the hard palate region, with grafts harvested using the linear technique on one side and the free de-epithelialized gingival graft technique on the other side. Each patient will undergo a preparatory phase for study inclusion, consisting of supragingival scaling, polishing, and oral hygiene instructions at least 3 weeks before study inclusion. Patients will be instructed on personalized and proper use of toothbrush, dental floss, and/or interdental brush. All surgical procedures in both groups will be performed by the same operator (CCO). Randomization will determine the side to be operated on first. The other side will be operated on after 30 days or until the patient reports complete absence of symptoms in the area of the first surgery to avoid confusion in patient-centered outcomes regarding pain and satisfaction with the techniques. Outcomes evaluated at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months include: gingival recession depth, probing depth, visible plaque, bleeding on probing, width of keratinized tissue, three-dimensional tissue assessment from intraoral scanning, and quality of life related. Linear and logistic generalized estimating equation models considering the longitudinal nature of the study will be used for data analysis. INCLUSION CRITERIA Patients aged 18 or older requiring root coverage in bilateral multiple recessions involving at least two teeth on each side of the mouth will be included. The number of teeth to be covered must be equal on both sides to avoid imbalance in patient-centered comparisons. Recessions should be RT1 type according to the 2017 Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal Conditions and Diseases (Jepsen et al. 2018) and without non-carious cervical lesions. EXCLUSION CRITERIA Individuals will not be considered eligible if they: - Present any form of immunological compromise; - Have diseases or systemic conditions contraindicating surgical procedures or affecting periodontal healing pattern, such as diabetes and autoimmune diseases; - Present active periodontitis, defined by presence of >=10% subgingival bleeding and probing depth and clinical attachment loss proximal >4mm (Tonetti et al. 2018); - Are current or ex-smokers; - Have allergies to ibuprofen and chlorhexidine digluconate. Research Objective: PRIMARY OBJECTIVE The overall objective of this study is to compare free gingival graft and subepithelial connective tissue graft in outcomes related to multiple recession coverage. SECONDARY OBJECTIVE Compare the two grafts in terms of clinical outcomes of root coverage; Compare the two grafts in terms of digital outcomes of root coverage obtained in scanning and tomography; Compare the two grafts in terms of patient-centered outcomes.
To assess the efficacy of minimally invasive Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access (VISTA) with collagen membrane and Advanced Platelet-rich Fibrin (A-PRF) in the treatment of multiple buccal gingival recession type 1(RT1) Cairo Classification.
The goal of this clinical randomized trial is to examine the effectiveness of hyaluronic acid in treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions in 2 groups. Control group will be presented by using a coronally advanced flap only (CAF) and experimental group will be presented with addition of hyaluronic acid to a coronally advanced flap (CAF+HA). The main question it aims to answer is: is there any difference in the reduction of multiple gingival recessions between the control (CAF) and the test group (CAF + HA)? The research would be conducted on subjects referred for specialist treatment at the Department of Periodontology (Faculty of dental medicine, University of Zagreb). A record would be kept of all patients who underwent a detailed clinical examination, those who did not meet the criteria for inclusion in the study and those who refused to participate in it. Participants who meet the inclusion criteria will undergo a detailed clinical examination and if they agree to participate in the research, they will sign the informed form. During the pre-treatment, patients will receive instructions and a demonstration on proper maintenance of oral hygiene as well as a teeth cleaning. In addition to the informed form, they will fill out the OHIP-14 questionnaire, and the researcher will measure the periodontal indices at the very beginning before the operation, as well as the Schiff index. Patients will be photographed at the baseline as well as at follow-up examinations. The total number of subjects would be 42, or 21 patients in the 2 observed groups. The control group refers to surgical intervention using a coronally advanced flap to cover multiple gingival recessions without the addition of hyaluronic acid (CAF) and the experimental group indicates the surgical intervention using a coronally advanced flap to cover multiple adjacent gingival recessions with the addition of hyaluronic acid intraoperatively (CAF + HA).
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of two treatments for gingival recession. The main questions it aims to answer are: Which treatment method, Coronally Positioned Flap with Connective Tissue Graft or Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel with connective tissue graft, is more effective in treating gum recession? How does the Anatomical Recession Rate, a new measurement technique, help in evaluating the success of these treatments? The patients will be treated with coronally advanced flap or modified coronally advanced tunnel + connective tissue graft to see which method is more effective in reducing gum recession, as measured by using anatomical recession rate.
Patients were randomly distributed into two groups (G1 and G2), all patients were treated by a submerged dental implant protocol and free gingival graft (FGG) harvested from the palate as follows: - Group 1 (G1), received the FGG two months before implant placement. - Group 2 (G2), received the FGG at the time of second-stage surgery (i.e. at the time of healing abutment placement). All periodontal and radiographic assessments were done by the same operator who was neither involved in the evaluation nor the distribution process. The operator did all the evaluation steps and was completely blinded to the treatment protocol.
This is a randomized triple-blind clinical trial. This comparative clinical study investigates the efficacy of root coverage using two periodontal techniques: the tunneling technique and the coronal advancement technique. The objective is to evaluate and compare the clinical, esthetic and patient perception outcomes after undergoing each procedure. Participants with specific gingival recessions will be included, and follow-up will be performed to measure root coverage, keratinized tissue gain and other relevant parameters. In addition, a detailed analysis of the morbidity associated with each technique will be performed. This study aims to provide valuable information to guide oral health professionals in choosing the most appropriate technique for the treatment of gingival recessions.
The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of conventional suture (CS) and modified sling suture (MSS) techniques, applied in free gingival graft (FGG) surgery using gingival unit graft (GUG) and conventional graft (CG) techniques, on clinical parameters and graft dimensions.
Cross-sectional study involving the measurement of the width of lingual keratinized tissue (in the implant locations) in fully edentulous patients restored with dental implants. The width of KT will be correlated with the primary outcome, diagnosis of peri-implantitis, defined as Probing depth (PPD)>= 6 mm, inflammation/ bleeding on probing (BOP) and bone loss >= 3 mm from the implant platform.