View clinical trials related to Gingival Recession.
Filter by:The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of two treatments for gingival recession. The main questions it aims to answer are: Which treatment method, Coronally Positioned Flap with Connective Tissue Graft or Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel with connective tissue graft, is more effective in treating gum recession? How does the Anatomical Recession Rate, a new measurement technique, help in evaluating the success of these treatments? The patients will be treated with coronally advanced flap or modified coronally advanced tunnel + connective tissue graft to see which method is more effective in reducing gum recession, as measured by using anatomical recession rate.
This is a randomized triple-blind clinical trial. This comparative clinical study investigates the efficacy of root coverage using two periodontal techniques: the tunneling technique and the coronal advancement technique. The objective is to evaluate and compare the clinical, esthetic and patient perception outcomes after undergoing each procedure. Participants with specific gingival recessions will be included, and follow-up will be performed to measure root coverage, keratinized tissue gain and other relevant parameters. In addition, a detailed analysis of the morbidity associated with each technique will be performed. This study aims to provide valuable information to guide oral health professionals in choosing the most appropriate technique for the treatment of gingival recessions.
Cross-sectional study involving the measurement of the width of lingual keratinized tissue (in the implant locations) in fully edentulous patients restored with dental implants. The width of KT will be correlated with the primary outcome, diagnosis of peri-implantitis, defined as Probing depth (PPD)>= 6 mm, inflammation/ bleeding on probing (BOP) and bone loss >= 3 mm from the implant platform.
Regression analysis in a recent systematic review showed significantly greater mRC and CRC values when modifications are done to the TUN procedure to achieve more coronal advancement of the flap, coronal advancement also helps in covering the underlying graft for better recession coverage outcomes (Tavelli et al., 2018), limited data is present on the possible influence of a covered or partially uncovered graft. However, it has been suggested that minimal exposure of the CTG may aid not only in achieving CRC but also a harmonious gingival margin (John et al., 2015; Rasperini et al., 2011).
Gingival recession is a common condition and its extent and prevalence increase with age. Majority of patients probably present with localized and shallow gingival recession that need a specific treatment because they are susceptible to further apical displacement of gingival margin. So if gingival recession is detected early, removal of causative factors and non surgical treatments initiated then it can prevent more advanced mucogingival defects. Studies have shown that non surgical periodontal therapy including proper oral hygiene instructions, periodic scaling and root planning obtained successful root coverage in shallow gingival recession. Minimal invasive non surgical periodontal therapy (MINST)uses the delicate instruments and magnifying loupes performing periodontal debridement with more effective calculus and biofilm removal and less soft tissue trauma , maintain the tissue architecture, benefit the healing phase, improve the clinical results and increase visibility. There is no study to evaluate efficacy of MINST versus conventional subgingival instrumentation in the restorative capacity of marginal gingival in RT1 gingival recession , so the present study will be conducted to compare and evaluate the efficacy of minimal invasive non surgical periodontal therapy (MINST) and conventional subgingival instrumentation in the restorative capacity of marginal gingiva involving RT1 gingival recession.
The objective of this project is to evaluate short-term and 1-year outcomes of treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recession defects (MAGRD) using the coronally advanced flap (CAF) with either conventional CTG (control group) or meshed CTG (mesh-CTG) (test group).
The aim of this research is to evaluate the effect of brushing on gingival recessions and to understand the impact of manual brushing and brushing with mechanical aid on their evolution. The study involves the recruitment of 90 patients with or without gingival recessions at the Dentistry service of the University of Genoa. The first phase involves the evaluation of the brushing force on the genesis of gingival recessions. A questionnaire will be filled out and the same toothbrushes and toothpastes will be provided for one month to 30 patients with recessions and 30 patients without recessions. After a month, the "wear" of the manual toothbrush and the gingival health indices will be measured. In this phase 60 patients with recessions will be divided into two groups according to the oral hygiene method that will be recommended. In the first group a super soft toothbrush will be delivered, in the second group a mechanical toothbrush. Gingival health indices will be taken and an intraoral scan will be done to measure recessions. At 6 months and 12 months the indices will be measured again and compared between the two groups. This research has two objectives: 1. Evaluate the differences in wear of the manual toothbrush head after one month of use between patients with gum recession and patients without gum recession. In the case of greater wear among patients with recessions it could be assumed that a greater brushing force is able to determine the formation of recessions. 2. Try to understand if there are differences between the super soft manual toothbrush and the mechanical toothbrush regarding the effectiveness of use and the "delicacy" on recession. Both tools are currently recommended for patients with recessions, but there are no studies in the literature comparing the two tools.
Comparison of the clinical effectiveness of self etch adhesive and fluoride varnish in reducing dentin hypersensitivity in patients with gingival recession. A Randomized Clinical Trial ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the clinical effectiveness of self etch adhesive and fluoride varnish in reducing dentin hypersensitivity in patients with gingival recession Study Design: Randomized Clinical Trial Place of Study: Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Peshawar Dental College, Warsak Road. Methodology: 142 diagnosed cases of Dentin hypersensitivity from outpatient department of nephrology, Prime Hospital Peshawar will be referred to operative department, Peshawar dental college for Comparison of the clinical effectiveness of self etch adhesive and fluoride varnish in reducing dentin hypersensitivity in patients with gingival recession. Results: Conclusion:
The aim of this study is to evaluate reduction of recession depth using lateral closed tunnel technique versus CAF technique using connective tissue graft in single RT2 gingival recession cases.
Free gingival grafting surgeries require palatal grafts harvesting from the patient own palates . The donor sites pain , infection and retarded healing by secondary intension are the complication .