View clinical trials related to Gastric Cancer.
Filter by:This is a study for participants with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who have had tumor progression after first-line platinum-contained therapy. The primary study hypotheses are that camrelizumab (SHR-1210) combined with apatinib prolongs overall survival (OS) for participants with tumors that show positive programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression.
Stomach cancer is the fifth most common digestive cancer and third main cause of death from cancer in the world. Modern management of Gastric cancer involves a multi-disciplinary approach involving surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, gastroenterologists and oncological radiologists. The most common clinical approach to Gastric adenocarcinoma is to begin with staging, which usually involves CT scan/ MRI combined with endoscopic US for more accurate T, N staging. Once the patient is deemed to have locally advanced gastric cancer (T3/T4,N0/+), a staging laparoscopy is recommended to rule out obvious or microscopic peritoneal metastatic disease. Additionally, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is initiated and followed by surgery +/- adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy.This protocol involves the addition of neoadjuvant HIPEC at the time of diagnostic laparoscopy as well as neoadjuvant radiation therapy for improved local and systemic control. The goal of this phase II clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy of a multi-modality approach to treating patients with locally advanced Gastric cancer by incorporating diagnostic laparoscopy with HIPEC, neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy, followed by surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. The trial aims to assess this multi-modality approach in inducing pathological complete response; decreased rates of disease progression during neoadjuvant therapy; and increased overall, disease-free, and peritoneal disease-free survival.
Venous Thromboembolic Events (ETVs) are the second leading cause of death (9.2% of causes of death) in cancer patients after tumor progression (1). Indeed, cancer is associated with a 4 to 7-fold risk of ETV during chemotherapy (2). This complication is observed in 20% of cancer patients (3), and is sometimes an inaugural manifestation of cancer. This risk is particularly increased during the first 3 months after cancer diagnosis (4). A biomarker correlated with the occurrence of ETVs would make it possible to target patients at high risk of thrombosis who could benefit from primary thromboprophylaxis, thus avoiding the complications, particularly haemorrhagic, and the additional costs associated with the long-term diagnostic and therapeutic management of ETVs. The investigator has implemented in the laboratory an innovative approach to the detection and quantification of circulating NETs by flow cytometry (FCM) allowing the routine determination of NETs. Therefore the investigator propose to assess NETs by CMF in a cohort of cancer patients with a very high risk of ETVs (pancreatic cancer, gastric cancer and colon cancer).
The placement of an abdominal drain consists one of the most controversial issues not only after gastrectomy, but also after any abdominal operation in general. During the past decades drains have been widely used after major abdominal operations. Nevertheless, following the latest perioperative management trends, not all surgeons seem to embrace the idea. There are still many new studies or in progress, mainly in the East, examining the prognostic value of the drain content after a gastrectomy. Thus, the use of a drain is still under question. The aim of the present study is to evaluate whether the placement of a perianastomotic drain after total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy contributes to the early diagnosis of intraabdominal complications such as bleeding, abscess, anastomotic leak or pancreatic fistula. The participants will be patients with pathologically confirmed gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer, and will undergo total gastrectomy plus D2 lymph node dissection and Roux-en-Y gastrointestinal tract reconstruction.
This is a prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled trial to compare Billroth II reconstruction versus conventional Roux-en-Y reconstruction versus long limb Roux-en-Y reconstruction for glycemic control in patients with concurrent type 2 diabetes and gastric cancer.
This clinical study is an open-label, Phase 1, dose-escalation study to determine the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the drug product produced by Administering CRX100 alone and in combination with Pembrolizumab in advanced solid malignancies. Patients will be screened and evaluated to determine whether or not they meet stated inclusion criteria. Enrolled subjects will undergo leukapheresis to enable the ex vivo generation of CRX100. Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), ovarian cancer, colorectal cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), malignant melanoma (excluding uveal melanoma), gastric cancer, triple negative breast cancer, and osteosarcoma. The study will start with monotherapy dose escalation followed by combination cohorts.
The study is a prospective, single arm, phase II trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) concomitant with XELOX for the treatment of unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) or Gastric (GC) Adenocarcinoma who were previously untreated with systemic therapy. The device is an experimental, portable, battery operated device for chronic administration of alternating electric fields (termed TTFields or TTF) to the region of the malignant tumor, by means of surface, insulated electrode arrays.
This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of Anlotinib wiht Toripalimab in advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer as first-line treatment.
This study will investigate OC-001 as monotherapy, and in combination with an anti-Programmed Cell Death Protein-1 (PD-1) or anti-Programmed Cell Death Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Antibody inhibitor, in various cancer types
Through previous clinical observations and literature, we found that the incidence of gallstones in patients after gastric cancer radical resection was significantly higher than that in the normal population (4%). However, its pathogenesis has not been clarified. We compare the risk of gallbladder stones after four different radical gastric cancer surgical methods, in order to provide prevention and treatment strategies for people with gallstones after gastric cancer.