View clinical trials related to Gastric Cancer.
Filter by:Background: Gastric cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) are more vulnerable to perioperative stress. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is widely used in surgical patients aiming at reducing stress responses. However, whether this approach is safe and feasible for gastric cancer patients received minimally invasive radical gastrectomy after NACT remained determined. So, the objective of this study is to investigate the effects of ERAS for this special group of gastric cancer patients. Materials and Methods: The data of gastric cancer patients who underwent minimally invasive radical gastrectomy after NACT were collected in this retrospective cohort study. Patients were divided into an ERAS group and a conventional group based on whether they received perioperative ERAS management. Propensity score matching was conducted to eliminate bias. Pre- and postoperative inflammatory and nutritional marker levels, postoperative complications, recovery indices and 3-year OS and RFS were observed.
The aim of this observational study is to comprehensively analyze the metabolites in plasma samples from multi-cancer patients using advanced mass spectrometry detection technology, in conjunction with metabolomics approaches. The goal is to construct a plasma metabolite database for multi-cancer patients. Simultaneously, we will delve into the exploration and validation of a series of metabolic biomarkers for early multi-cancer diagnosis. The objective is to establish a safer, more convenient, and more sensitive early screening method, thereby providing a reliable scientific foundation and critical evidence for improving the early diagnostic process for individuals at high risk of multi-cancer.
The object of this exploratory clinical trial is to evaluate intra and post-operative complications in a population that underwent Robotic Gastrectomy, with multiple platforms: - DaVinci; - Hugo; - Versius. This study is divided into two phases: in the first phase, gastrectomy will be performed using both the new platforms (Hugo and Versius) and the standard platform (Da Vinci), to evaluate the feasibility of the surgical procedure. In the second phase, the three platforms will be compared to evaluate any differences in the learning curve for an upper-GI surgeon, expert in laparoscopic surgery but not with robotic one. The questions it aims to answer are: - Are differences (intra-operative, post-operative, oncological, functional, technical, and economic) among the three different platforms observable? - Are there any differences between the three platforms related to the learning curve for surgeons? Participants will be enrolled, after obtaining informed consent, in one of the following cohorts: 1. surgery with the daVinci platform; 2. surgery with the Hugo platform; 3. surgery with the Versius platform.
Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will undergo laparoscopic proximal gastric cancer radical surgery, and esophagogastric anastomosis will be performed using the ThTV method. Review the surgical video and record the time for making the extracorporeal muscle flap, tunnel passage time, and anastomosis time. The production time of the muscle flap is based on the electric knife incision of the muscle flap as the starting point, and successfully penetrating the muscle flap as the endpoint. The tunnel passes through time, pulling the residual end of the esophagus, and starting to pass through the gastric muscle flap tunnel as the time starting point. The complete placement of the gastric tube into the lower mediastinum is used as the time endpoint. The anastomosis time is calculated from the first needle of suturing the residual stomach and the posterior wall of the esophagus until the end of the plasma flap suturing. Record perioperative indicators such as surgical time, bleeding volume, and postoperative hospital stay. The definition of anastomotic stenosis is that in gastroscopy, those who cannot pass through the anastomotic site with ultra-fine endoscopy are judged as anastomotic stenosis. Postoperative pathology was performed using the 8th edition AJCC staging. Follow up every three months after surgery, including blood tests, liver and kidney function, and tumor markers. According to the situation, choose gastroscopy, upper gastrointestinal imaging, and chest abdominal pelvic enhanced CT. Evaluate postoperative reflux symptoms such as heartburn and sternal pain using the Visick grading system. Gastroscopy Los Angeles grading was used to evaluate postoperative reflux esophagitis.
Currently, standard treatment options for gastric cancer failed to first-line treatment include monotherapy with paclitaxel/irinotecan/docetaxel/albumin paclitaxel, or paclitaxel combined with ramucirumab. However, the efficacy of these regimens is still far from satisfactory. The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel combined with cadonilimab for the second-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer.
Based on the interaction between radiation therapy and immunotherapy and the potential potentiation of Probio-M9 for the treatment of ICIs, this study is planned to design an integrated treatment protocol for the first-line treatment of advanced gastrointestinal tumors through the use of macrofractionated radiotherapy as a means of immune activation, combined with the synergistic effect of Probio-M9 microbial agents and PD-1 inhibitors.
The purpose of this study is to measure the efficacy and safety of AZD0901 compared to Investigator's choice of therapy as 2L+ treatment for participants with advanced or metastatic gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma expressing CLDN18.2.
CIME is a multicenter, randomised, comparative, open-label phase III study aiming to compare the survival of patients suffering from MSI-H/dMMR locally advanced or metastatic oeasogastric adenocarcinoma treated by a bi-immunotherapy (experimental arm) versus standard current treatment (FOLFOX/XELOX + nivolumab : standard arm).
The goal of this survey is to investigate the participants' preference for a specific screening/diagnostic tool to detect and assess gastro-esophageal cancer. The main question it aims to answer are: - Which diagnostic modality is preferred by patients and the general population? - Which features of the diagnostic test are most detrimental in the decision-making for one or the other modality? - Are geographical differences present in regard to the preference for a diagnostic modality? Participants will be asked to complete a survey of 20-25min, including a brief intake regarding their socio-economic status. This approach will allow us to correct for confounding factors.
The goal of this minimally invasive interventional study is to learn if oncometabolic biomarkers, detected in the exhaled breath and blood can identify early-stage gastro-oesophageal cancer in patient at risk for gastro-oesophageal cancer. The main questions this study aims to answer: Are oncometabolites proficient and reproducible enough to function as diagnostic biomarkers? Can these biomarkers identify early-stage gastro-esophageal cancer? Researchers will compare participants with gastro-oesophageal cancer to healthy controls and participants with Barrett's esophagus to detect meaningful differences between the groups. Participants will provide a breath and blood sample during their routine standard of care visits.