View clinical trials related to Gastric Cancer.
Filter by:This is a prospective, single-center, single-arm Phase II study evaluating the efficacy of the myDIET software tool in the nutritional management of patients with localized and resectable esogastric junction cancer.
The goal of this clinical trial is to explore feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of end-of-life conversation game "Hello" as a tool to help individuals with various solid cancer types (including: breast, gastro-intestinal, lung, melanoma, head and neck, and/or genito-urinary cancers) treated at Penn State Health clinics and their loved ones perform advance care planning (ACP). The main questions it aims to answer are: What modifications and/or adaptations are necessary to Hello for use in cancer populations? What impact does participation in Hello event have on health care usage (e.g., number of hospitalizations, ICU admissions, emergency department visits, etc.)? How feasible is it to randomize participants to play either Hello for Cancer or Table Topics? Participants will: - Complete pre-game questionnaires - Play either Hello or Table Topics game - Complete post-game questionnaires - Participate in a focus group - Complete a telephone follow up interview 1-4 months after their event This study is a continuation of NCT06028152.
Gastric cancer, also known as stomach cancer, is a serious disease that affects the stomach. It's one of the most common types of cancer, and sadly, many people die from it each year. But there's hope! We can catch gastric cancer early with a special test called endoscopy. This test helps doctors find cancer or pre-cancerous changes in the stomach early, when it's easier to treat. However, not enough people get this test, especially in places where healthcare isn't easily available. That's why we're doing this study. We want to find out if we can encourage more people to get the endoscopy test for gastric cancer. We're going to try two different ways to encourage people to get the test. First, we'll give some people money or other incentives to help cover the costs of getting the test. Second, we'll give others information and support to help them understand why the test is important and how it can help them. We'll be doing this study in two provinces in China, where gastric cancer is a big problem. We'll ask thousands of people to join the study, and we'll randomly assign them to one of the two groups. Then, we'll see if more people in one group get the endoscopy test compared to the other group. Our hope is that by finding out what works best, we can help more people catch gastric cancer early and get the treatment they need. This could save many lives and make a big difference in fighting this disease.
To evaluate the efficacy of Tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in neoadjuvant treatment of patients with MHC-II positive (IHC≥2+) and locally advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma by evaluating the main pathologic response rate (MPR).
Currently, standard treatment options for gastric cancer failed to first-line treatment include monotherapy with paclitaxel/irinotecan/docetaxel/albumin paclitaxel, or paclitaxel combined with ramucirumab. However, the efficacy of these regimens is still far from satisfactory. The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel combined with cadonilimab for the second-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer.
CIME is a multicenter, randomised, comparative, open-label phase III study aiming to compare the survival of patients suffering from MSI-H/dMMR locally advanced or metastatic oeasogastric adenocarcinoma treated by a bi-immunotherapy (experimental arm) versus standard current treatment (FOLFOX/XELOX + nivolumab : standard arm).
The goal of this survey is to investigate the participants' preference for a specific screening/diagnostic tool to detect and assess gastro-esophageal cancer. The main question it aims to answer are: - Which diagnostic modality is preferred by patients and the general population? - Which features of the diagnostic test are most detrimental in the decision-making for one or the other modality? - Are geographical differences present in regard to the preference for a diagnostic modality? Participants will be asked to complete a survey of 20-25min, including a brief intake regarding their socio-economic status. This approach will allow us to correct for confounding factors.
The goal of this minimally invasive interventional study is to learn if oncometabolic biomarkers, detected in the exhaled breath and blood can identify early-stage gastro-oesophageal cancer in patient at risk for gastro-oesophageal cancer. The main questions this study aims to answer: Are oncometabolites proficient and reproducible enough to function as diagnostic biomarkers? Can these biomarkers identify early-stage gastro-esophageal cancer? Researchers will compare participants with gastro-oesophageal cancer to healthy controls and participants with Barrett's esophagus to detect meaningful differences between the groups. Participants will provide a breath and blood sample during their routine standard of care visits.
This clinical trial will enroll subjects with HER2+ solid tumors and is conducted in two phases, which are phase 1a and phase 1b. The primary objective of phase 1 is to determine the safety and tolerability of AB-201 in subjects with advanced HER2+ solid tumors.
Phase II Clinical Study of Adebrelimab Combined with Apatinib and Paclitaxel for Injection(Albumin Bound) as Second-line Therapy in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer Previously Treated with Immunotherapy