View clinical trials related to Gastric Cancer.
Filter by:Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will undergo laparoscopic proximal gastric cancer radical surgery, and esophagogastric anastomosis will be performed using the ThTV method. Review the surgical video and record the time for making the extracorporeal muscle flap, tunnel passage time, and anastomosis time. The production time of the muscle flap is based on the electric knife incision of the muscle flap as the starting point, and successfully penetrating the muscle flap as the endpoint. The tunnel passes through time, pulling the residual end of the esophagus, and starting to pass through the gastric muscle flap tunnel as the time starting point. The complete placement of the gastric tube into the lower mediastinum is used as the time endpoint. The anastomosis time is calculated from the first needle of suturing the residual stomach and the posterior wall of the esophagus until the end of the plasma flap suturing. Record perioperative indicators such as surgical time, bleeding volume, and postoperative hospital stay. The definition of anastomotic stenosis is that in gastroscopy, those who cannot pass through the anastomotic site with ultra-fine endoscopy are judged as anastomotic stenosis. Postoperative pathology was performed using the 8th edition AJCC staging. Follow up every three months after surgery, including blood tests, liver and kidney function, and tumor markers. According to the situation, choose gastroscopy, upper gastrointestinal imaging, and chest abdominal pelvic enhanced CT. Evaluate postoperative reflux symptoms such as heartburn and sternal pain using the Visick grading system. Gastroscopy Los Angeles grading was used to evaluate postoperative reflux esophagitis.
Based on the interaction between radiation therapy and immunotherapy and the potential potentiation of Probio-M9 for the treatment of ICIs, this study is planned to design an integrated treatment protocol for the first-line treatment of advanced gastrointestinal tumors through the use of macrofractionated radiotherapy as a means of immune activation, combined with the synergistic effect of Probio-M9 microbial agents and PD-1 inhibitors.
The purpose of this study is to measure the efficacy and safety of AZD0901 compared to Investigator's choice of therapy as 2L+ treatment for participants with advanced or metastatic gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma expressing CLDN18.2.
Gastric cancer continues to have a poor prognosis primarily due to the inability to detect it in its early stages. This study will develop and validate a blood assay to facilitate the non-invasive detection of gastric cancer.
This trial is a prospective, single arm, single center, phase II clinical study aimed at subjects with advanced gastric cancer and para aortic lymph node metastasis, exploring the feasibility and safety of Sintilimab Injection combined with synchronous chemo-radiotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy. Patients will receive sintilimab Injection (200mg iv q3w d1) combined with concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The chemotherapy regimen will use oxaliplatin 130mg/m2+S-1 40mg/m2 bid d1-14. Radiotherapy is performed using intraperitoneal radiation therapy, once a day, five times a week, at a dose of 1.8-2 Gy/f, for a total of 45-50.4 Gy (60-66 Gy for lymph node lesions). Radiation therapy starts from the second cycle of Sintilimab Injection combined with chemotherapy. The subjects underwent imaging evaluation after completing 4 cycles of combination chemotherapy and radiation therapy with Sintilimab Injection. Evaluated as a surgical subject (surgical conditions: imaging evaluation of enlarged lymph nodes adjacent to the abdominal aorta with PR or no significant activity), radical surgery will be performed within 4 weeks after the last study drug treatment. After surgery, the researcher will determine the necessity of adjuvant treatment and develop an adjuvant treatment plan based on the subject's condition. Subjects evaluated as inoperable will have their best follow-up treatment plan determined by the researcher.
In our prior research, a risk scoring model for the occurrence of lymph node metastasis in patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer was established. To further validate this scoring model, a prospective study has been designed with the aim of prospectively assessing the model's clinical applicability.
The goal of this study is to test a new PET imaging agent in patients with solid tumors. This tracer is made of a radioactively-labeled monoclonal antibody MNPR-101, and can show where tumors are present in the body using a PET-scan. The investigators will investigate if the new imaging agent correctly shows all tumor lesions. In the future, this method may be useful to help predict who will benefit from certain therapies. Participants will be injected with the radioactive tracer once. After injection, participants will undergo 3 PET-scans. Each PET-scan will take a maximum of 30 minutes. The PET-scans are on separate days within 10 days after injection of the tracer (e.g., 2 hours after injection plus 3-5 days and 7-10 days after injection). Furthermore, the investigators will take blood samples 6 times (5 mL each). Blood pharmacokinetics (PK) will be measured on Day 1 at 10 min, 1h, 2h, once on Days 3-5, and once on Days 7-10. The amount of radioactivity injected will range between 37-74 MBq (±10%).
Many studies have shown a significant change of diversity and composition in gut microbiota across the gastric carcinogenesis process, particularly in patients with gastric cancer. However, there has been no analysis of gastric microbiota using the mucosal brushing technique, despite its favoring benefit in microbiota study. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate microbiota profile in patients with gastric cancer, compared to those without gastric cancer by using mucosal brush sampling. This will improve current knowledge of the potential role of the microbiome in patient gastric cancer as a future biomarker marker using brushing sampling.
Endoscopic screening of gastric cancer combined with screening colonoscopy
After the initial diagnostic laparoscopy the Control group patients undergo 6 courses of polychemotherapy according to the FLOT scheme; the examination is carried out every 3 courses (after the 3rd and the 6th courses) with the control diagnostic laparoscopy after 6 courses of polychemotherapy. In the event of the complete regression of foci along the peritoneum and receiving Cy- in the peritoneal lavage, the dynamic observation or cytoreductive surgery is considered (optionally); in case of the incomplete response the dynamic observation is carried out until progression; in case of progression the 2nd line of chemotherapy or the optimal palliative care options depending on the clinical situation is considered. After the initial diagnostic laparoscopy the Study group patients undergo courses of polychemotherapy according to the scheme FLOT (the 1st, the 3rd, the 5th courses) and mFLOT (the 2nd , the 4th, the 6th courses) in the amount of 6 (six, 3+3); the examination is carried out every 3 courses (after the 3rd and the 6th courses) with dPIPAC sessions using docetaxel (thus excluding it from the system administration) in the 2nd , the 4th, the 6th courses of polychemotherapy. Control diagnostic laparoscopy is not performed in the group No 2, its function is performed by the revision at the PIPAC session of the 6th course of polychemotherapy, which corresponds to the time interval of the Control group. In the event of the complete regression of foci along the peritoneum and receiving Cy- in the peritoneal lavage, the dynamic observation or cytoreductive surgery is considered (optionally); in case of the incomplete response the dynamic observation is carried out until progression; in case of progression the 2nd line of chemotherapy or the optimal palliative care options depending on the clinical situation is considered.