View clinical trials related to Emergencies.
Filter by:The aim of the study is to synthesize qualitative evidence related to preventable hospitalizations/ emergency department visits from the perspectives of patients, their families/caregivers, health care providers, and stakeholders, in the hope to identify generalizable conclusions about why social risk factors matter to preventable hospitalizations/ emergency department visits
A randomized clinical trial will be performed. Patients aged 3 and 4 years who attend the pediatric emergency service of the Miguel Servet Hospital in Zaragoza and require venipuncture will be selected. In the control group, traditional venipuncture will be performed, placing the child in supine position on the stretcher with the limb to be punctured in decline. In the intervention group, the DAK method will be used, where the adult will hold the child simulating a hug. A professional will take care of immobilizing the chosen limb, and the nurse will perform the venipuncture. The researchers believe that 3 and 4-year-old children subjected to venipuncture using the Koala Attachment Distraction method present a lower level of stress and pain, as well as their companions a lower level of anxiety, compared to those subjected to physical restraint. Condition of disease: Patients aged 3 and 4 years, who attend the pediatric emergency service of the Miguel Servet Hospital in Zaragoza and require venipuncture. Intervention: Traditional venipuncture, in supine position on the stretcher with the limb to be punctured in decline. + DAK method, simulating a hug.
This is a prospective clinical research study to test the effectiveness of the Levonorgestrel (LNG) 52 mg Intrauterine Device (IUD) for emergency contraception (EC) and same-day start use that will enroll people receiving care at Planned Parenthood affiliates across the U.S. Our prior work demonstrated efficacy (shows that it works in an ideal setting) for the LNG 52 mg IUD for these uses and this study will test effectiveness (how well it works in the real world) in a larger, heterogenous population in a usual care setting where participants select their method and are not randomly assigned to it. The study population will include people initiating an LNG 52 mg IUD and meet inclusion and exclusion criteria at 8 Planned Parenthood affiliates nationwide. Planned Parenthood Federation of America was the first major healthcare organization to change its practice to incorporate the changes we are studying here. As such, all study participants will be offered the opportunity to choose the interventional IUD at the site they visit. The primary outcome is pregnancy status one month after LNG IUD placement by home urine pregnancy test or clinical record review. Participant follow up concludes one month after enrollment. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate reproducibility of earlier findings in a more heterogenous population. As such, IUD placement is not a study procedure but a component of clinical care. The study interventions only involve study participation and provision of data around the use of the levonorgestrel 52 mg IUD for EC or same day start.
Colon diseases can turn in a clinical emergency with the onset of some important complications. Some critical conditions are more common in aged patients because they are more frails. The aim of this study is to examine ultra 80 patients, undergoing emergency colorectal surgery, evaluating the aspects associated with post-operative complications and other problems in the short term. From November 2020 to February 2022 we have included 32 consecutive patients older than 80 undergoing emergency surgery due to colon diseases. We have collected and analysed all demographic, and operative data and then applied CR-POSSUM score and correlated with postoperative hospital stay and the onset of postoperative complications according to Clavien Dindo classification. Postoperative factors were selectively evaluated based on the clinical scenario and different colic pathologies. There was no statistically significant differences, in terms of postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, reoperation rate and 30-day mortality. The number of cases of blood transfusions was significant, more numerous in case of intestinal perforation and bleeding cases. The value of Operative Severity Score in the Bowel Perforations, was significantly higher. The use of a score to stratify the risk is a useful tool especially in elderly patients to undergo emergency surgery. The CR-POSSUM score was important for predicting morbidity in our study. Emergency manifestations of colon diseases in the elderly show higher morbidity and mortality rates.
Effect of implementation of the Danish Emergency Surgery (DANAKIR) support Network on post-discharge outcomes after major emergency abdominal surgery: a prospective before and-after study Background Major emergency abdominal surgery is performed in more than 5000 patients yearly in Denmark. In general, little is known about the period after the discharge of these patients besides that chronic pain, physical dysfunction, and quality of life are severely affected in up to 50% of patients at long-term follow-up. A recent study investigating unplanned readmission after major emergency abdominal surgery found that up to 50% undergo unplanned readmission within the first 180 days after discharge. Purpose The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of inviting patients undergoing major emergency surgery and their relatives to join a support network after discharge (the DANAKIR network). Methods This study is designed as a before- and after study. Prior to establishing the DANAKIR (Danish Emergency Surgery Network) support network, the investigators will consecutively during a one year inclusion period prospectively include all patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery with a midline laparotomy. The inclusion period starts 1st August 2021. The investigators will register the following in the pre-implementation phase: - Postoperative day (POD) 30: Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) (by telephone) - POD90: Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) (by telephone), readmissions (by hospital file) - POD 180: Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) (by telephone), readmissions (by hospital file) - Number of days at home with 90 days (by hospital file) - Number of participants with at least one readmission (by hospital file) Hereafter the investigators will establish the DANAKIR support network. The investigators plan for a six-month inclusion period with DANAKIR starting 1th of September 2022 Intervention The DANAKIR intervention will consist of: - Structured written discharge information for the participanats and relatives about expectations and precautions - Invitation to the DANAKIR monthly information meeting All patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery and members of their family are invited to participate in at least one DANAKIR meeting. Patients and their relatives can participate in as many meetings as they wish; however, we encourage all patients to participate at least once. DANAKIR meetings The monthly meetings are a core component of the support network. One time each month, a meeting will be held at Herlev Hospital with the participation of an emergency surgeon, an emergency surgery dedicated nurse, a dietician, and a physiotherapist. Furthermore, there will be research personnel present. Each professional (surgeon, nurse, dietician, physiotherapist) will host an informative 15 minute session regarding the postoperative course after major emergency surgery. Following the presentations time for questions in plenum and private with the different experts will be held. Furthermore, there will be an opportunity for networking at the DANAKIR meeting. Each meeting is planned to last 2 hours. At the end of each meeting the patients will be asked to evaluate the meeting and content. Outcome measures The primary outcome of this study is the number of days at home within 90 days of surgery. The secondary outcomes are quality of life at 30 days, 90 days, and 180 days after surgery and the number of patients with at least one emergency readmission 90 days and 180 days from surgery. Trial size The investigators expect to include 200 patients in the before group and 200 patients in the after group. Perspectives The DANAKIR support network examines if a structure with physical network meetings is effective in regard to quality of life and preventing readmissions after major emergency surgery. The investigators hypothesize that the days at home will increase within 90 days from surgery and that quality of life will increase for both participants and their relatives by implementing a simple and obvious solution. If the DANAKIR network proves efficient it is an easily implemented solution to increase quality of life and days at home after major emergency surgery.
Our study aims to evaluate whether the Emergency Department (PS) can support the health system to improve the prevention and management of chronic inflammatory diseases and ensure actions aimed at screening, raising awareness and informing the population. Specifically, the determination of the prevalence of a widely diffused pathology such as fatty liver disease aims to be the precursor of future pilot studies aimed at evaluating the advantages and critical issues of the PS as a prevention tool.
Moms will call and agencies will determine if she is eligible based on basic criteria. If she is eligible, the agency will send her an intake application link to complete, which includes a consent form. After completing the survey, if she is still eligible, she will be placed on a waitlist for services. When a bed becomes available in an individual agency, the agency will call two moms at the top of the waitlist, conduct in-person interviews to confirm eligibility and good fit. They will use a computer to randomly assign one to treatment and one to control. Agency will let moms know of their status and will allow the treatment mom to move in. Moms in treatment and control will be surveyed approximately one year post the mother's reported due date of the child.
Background and study aims: Computerised Tomography (CT) head scans are frequently requested by Emergency Department (ED) clinicians as one of the investigations for their patients. This often causes a delay when waiting for specialist radiologists to report the findings of the scan. The purpose of this study is to see if online training can improve the ability of ED clinicians to interpret the scans themselves, to a level sufficient to make clinical decisions based on their findings and to explore what aspects of this process they find most challenging. Participants: Emergency Department clinicians who are working in the Emergency Departments of participating sites between April to September 2022 (inclusive), who request CT Head scans as part of their routine clinical practice. What does the study involve?: 180 ED clinicians will be recruited across 6 hospital sites in the United Kingdom. All will undertake a baseline online assessment to measure their accuracy in interpreting CT head scans. One group will then undertake an online training module, with a subsequent assessment immediately afterwards, then over the following 3 months will record interpretations for 30 CT head scans. Head images encountered in participants' routine clinical practice, and their findings, will be compared with the radiology reports for each scan. Participants will then undertake further online assessments 3 and 6 months after the start of the study. Their overall results will be compared with a control group, who will undergo the same process, but undertake the online training after they have tried to interpret 30 scans in their clinical practice. Participants will continue to base their clinical decisions on radiologist reports, not their own interpretations, so patient care will not be affected by this study.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome of obstructive colon cancer surgery in terms of days-to-starting adjuvant therapy and quality of life.
Background Hindsight bias and outcome bias may play an important role in retrospective law of errors in Emergency Medicine and may affect judgement. In addition, differences in sex and medical history may affect treatment decisions (implicit bias). Aims First, to assess if and to what extent knowledge of an outcome may affect the ability of Emergency Physicians and physicians with experience in disciplinary law to determine the quality of care given. Secondly, to investigate whether a medical history with nonspecific/functional/somatoform complaints and sex differences affect clinical decision making in Emergency Physicians. Study design and analyses A web-based cross-sectional survey using vignettes with six clinical scenarios (four vignettes for outcome/hindsight bias, four vignettes for implicit bias). The survey was sent to all Emergency Physicians and residents in training in the Netherlands. Four scenarios were also sent to physicians with experience in disciplinary law. In four vignettes, participants received a scenario without an outcome, or with a positive or negative outcome. They were asked to rate the quality of care provided as sufficient or insufficient and, in more detail, poor/below average/average/good/outstanding and how likely they thought it would be that the patient would have had a negative outcome (in percent). In the other two vignettes, participants received one vignette describing a scenario of a patient presenting to the ED with acute abdominal pain and one vignette describing a scenario with chest pain. The sex and medical history differed among the participants (e.g. male/female, nonspecific medical history/somatic medical history). Participants were asked whether they would prescribe pain medication, and whether they would do diagnostic imaging. Importance and impact This research may help to understand the impact of knowing the outcome in retrospective laws in Dutch Emergency Physicians and physicians with experience in disciplinary law. If outcome and hindsight bias are present, retrospective judgement may need a different approach in medicine, i.e. blinding judges for the outcome, to prevent wrong justice and adverse effect on clinicians well-being. Also, if implicit bias in sex and medical history is present, a training programme is needed to reduce certain bias and to improve equality in the provided care.