There are about 25435 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in United Kingdom. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare implementation of a Decision Support System (DSS) - aligned to the 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines - in addition to routine clinical care versus routine clinical care without availability of a DSS, in participants aged ≥18 to < 80 years old presenting with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The main questions it aims to answer are: - to assess whether the availability of a DSS (which provides estimates of risk and estimates of potential benefit through LDL-C lowering) to current practice results in an increase in the early initiation of combination Lipid Lowering Therapies (LLTs) or intensification of LLT regimens compared to current practice alone over a 24-week period after an Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS) event - To estimate in the study cohort the potential benefits of guideline-based LLT intensification via simulation-based methods using estimates of baseline risk: LLT utilisation, additional LDL-C reductions and LDL-C goal achievement, on simulated risk of CV events through modelling. Participants will give consent to randomised clinical sites to collect their data. The clinical sites will either be randomised to standard of care or the availability of and access to the DSS. Researchers will compare patients from DSS and Non-DSS sites to see if the availability of the DSS results in implementation of more intensive lipid lowering regimens, resulting in the achievement of lower LDL-C values as well as the proportion of patients who reach target LDL-C levels (<1.4 mmol/L (<55 mg/dL) by Week 24.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer death in the United Kingdom, with approximately 17,000 deaths per year. The five-year survival rate from CRC is only 10% when discovered at a late stage, but exceeds 90% if diagnosed early. Symptoms related to CRC can be non-specific, therefore the decision to refer for a colonoscopy can be challenging. There is a clear need to improve earlier detection of CRC so that patients with CRC can be identified earlier and faster, enabling them to start treatment more quickly. The study team is developing a non-invasive breath test that detects small molecules called volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that are specific to CRC. For patients with non-specific symptoms, this test would help GPs to identify those patients that may have underlying CRC, who would benefit from referral for specialised CRC tests.
An non controlled, long term, multi center investigation
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is an immune-mediated disease associated with inflammation of multiple organ systems. This study will assess how safe and effective upadacitinib is in treating adult participants with moderately to severely active SLE. Adverse events and change in the disease activity will be assessed. Upadacitinib is an approved drug for rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and axial spondylarthritis and is being developed for the treatment of SLE. This study is "double-blinded", which means that neither the trial participants nor the study doctors will know who will be given upadacitinib and who will be given placebo (does not contain treatment drug) . This study comprised of 3 sub studies. In Study 1 and Study 2, study doctors put the participants in 1 of the 2 groups, called treatment arms. Each group receives a different treatment. There is a 1 in 2 chance that participants will be assigned to placebo. Eligible participants from Study 1 and Study 2 will enter Study 3 at week 52 to receive specific doses of upadacitinib based on their disease activity and their original treatment assignment in Study 1 or 2. Approximately 500 participants diagnosed with SLE will be enrolled in each of the Study 1 and Study 2 in approximately 320 sites across the world. Participants will receive oral tablets of upadacitinib or matching placebo once daily for 52 weeks in Study 1 and Study 2. Eligible participants from Study 1 and Study 2 will receive oral tablets of upadacitinib once daily for 52 weeks in Study 3. There may be higher treatment burden for participants in this trial compared to their standard of care. Participants will attend regular visits during the study at a hospital or clinic. The effect of the treatment will be checked by medical assessments, checking for side effects and completing questionnaires.
Developing and testing a musculoskeletal national audit in community/primary care
The goal of this observational study is to learn about the factors which determine how well ventricular tachycardia (VT) is tolerated. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. What impact does coronary artery disease have on the ability for a patient to tolerate VT? 2. Does treatment of coronary artery disease with stents improve the tolerability of VT? Participants who are undergoing a clinically indicated coronary angiogram or coronary angioplasty procedure will have measurements of blood pressure, coronary pressure and coronary flow made during pacing at a range of heart rates.
The purpose of this study is to assess the socio-demographic, disease-related and treatment-related characteristics, and the standard of care (SOC) treatment patterns of participants with major depressive disorder (MDD) with anhedonia with inadequate response to their current antidepressant treatments and treated according to the standard of care treatment.
A multi-part study of ALG-097558 to evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interaction potential after single and multiple doses in healthy volunteers
Prostate cancer affects 1 in 8 men and in the UK approximately 14,000 men are treated with radiotherapy. Around half of men diagnosed with prostate cancer will also have an enlarged prostate making it difficult to pass urine. When having radiotherapy, the prostate swells further which can lead to complete blockage of urine flow (urine retention), sepsis and kidney failure in severe cases. Radiotherapy itself can also cause urinary symptoms meaning that some patients can continue to have difficulty passing urine long after their cancer treatment finishes. Around a third of patients will need an operation to shrink their prostate before radiotherapy to prevent these possible short and long-term problems. The standard operation is a transurethral resection of prostate (TURP). This involves cutting a channel through the prostate to improve urine flow. This will be compared with a newer procedure known as UroLift. During UroLift, clips are inserted into the water pipe to pin back the prostate to widen the channel and improve urine flow. Which treatment is more acceptable to patients and gives better outcomes has never been tested before in men having radiotherapy for prostate cancer. The study will help us to understand how the treatments impact on a patient's quality of life and understand what matters most to patients. The results of this feasibility study will help us design a bigger study to assess TURP and UroLift in a larger group of patients across different hospitals. This research will help future patients make decisions about prostate cancer treatment choices that can affect their long-term well-being.
The goals of this clinical study are to identify if GS-4528 alone or in combination with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) (Anti-PD-1) Monoclonal Antibody is safe and tolerable in people with solid tumors and to identify the recommended dose of GS-4528 for further development that is safe to give to people alone or in combination with Anti-PD-1 Monoclonal Antibody. The primary objectives of this study are: - To assess the safety and tolerability of GS-4528 as monotherapy and in combination with Anti-PD-1 Monoclonal Antibody in participants with advanced solid tumors. - To identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/maximum administered dose (MAD) and/or the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of GS-4528 as monotherapy and in combination with Anti-PD-1 Monoclonal Antibody in participants with advanced solid tumors.