There are about 25435 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in United Kingdom. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The study is intended to quantify the effect of co-administration and staggered dosing of AZD5055 and nintedanib on exposures of nintedanib in healthy participants.
Researchers are looking for a better way to treat people with atrial fibrillation and prevent stroke or systemic embolism (blood clots travelling through the blood stream to plug another vessel). Atrial fibrillation is a condition of having irregular and often rapid heartbeat. It can lead to the formation of blood clots in the heart which can travel through the blood stream to plug another vessel, and like this lead to serious and life-threatening conditions, such as a stroke. A stroke occurs because the brain tissue beyond the blockage no longer receives nutrients and oxygen so that brain cells die. As strokes arising from atrial fibrillation can involve extensive areas of the brain, it is important to prevent them. Blood clots are formed in a process known as coagulation. Medications are already available to prevent the formation of blood clots. When taken by mouth (orally), they are known as oral anticoagulants (OACs) including apixaban. OACs decrease the risk of the above-mentioned serious and life-threatening conditions. The main side effect of OACs is an increase of the risk of bleeding. The study treatment asundexian is a new type of anticoagulant currently under development to provide further treatment options. Asundexian aims to further improve the standard of care with regard to the risk of bleeding. The main purpose of this study is to collect more data about how well asundexian works to prevent stroke and systemic embolism and how safe it is compared to apixaban in people with atrial fibrillation and at high risk for stroke. To see how well the study treatment asundexian works researchers compare: - how long asundexian works well and - how long apixaban works well after the start of the treatment. Working well means that the treatments can prevent the following from happening: - stroke and/or - systemic embolism. The study will keep collecting data until a certain number of strokes or embolisms happen in the study. To see how safe asundexian is, the researchers will compare how often major bleedings occur after taking the study treatments asundexian and apixaban, respectively. Major bleedings are bleedings that have a serious or even life-threatening impact on a person's health. The study participants will be randomly (by chance) assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups, A and B. Dependent on the treatment group, the participants will either take the study treatment asundexian by mouth once a day or apixaban by mouth twice a day for approximately 9 - 33 months. Each participant will be in the study for approximately 9 - 34 months. There will be visits to the study site every 3 to 6 months and up to 7 phone calls. Those participants who do not want or are unable to have visits to the study site may join the study remotely in selected locations. The location name contains the abbreviation - DCT in such cases. During the study, the study team will: - take blood samples - do physical examinations - examine heart health using an electrocardiogram (ECG) - check vital signs such as blood pressure and heart rate - do pregnancy tests - ask the participants questions about their quality of life - ask the participants questions about how they are feeling and what adverse events they are having. An adverse event is any medical problem that a participant has during a study. Doctors keep track of all adverse events that happen in studies, even if they do not think the adverse events might be related to the study treatments.
The goal of this clinical study is to test how well the study drug, obeldesivir (formerly GS-5245), works and how safe it is in treating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in participants that have a higher risk of getting a serious illness.
The main purpose of this study is to assess is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MK-1942 as adjunctive therapy in participants with mild to moderate Alzheimer's Disease (AD) dementia.
This is a 2-part, single-centre, randomised study in healthy males. Part 1 is a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose (SAD) study in healthy males. Part 2 is a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, multiple ascending dose (MAD) study in healthy males.
This is a multi-center first-in-human prospective clinical investigation to evaluate the safety and performance of the FibroFix™ Cartilage P Implant and Drill Set. The Implant is a medical device designed by Orthox Ltd. to repair a damaged area of cartilage within the knee joint. The aim is to 75 participants over two Stages: In STAGE I, up to a total of 6 subjects will be recruited and safety assessed after 6 months of follow-up. In Stage II an additional 69 subjects. The subjects will be followed up for 2 years with MRI imaging, then a further 8 years with patient outcome questionnaires.
This is an open, single-arm, multicentre and interventional investigation to evaluate the debriding effect of ChloraSolv when used on pressure ulcers in need of debridement. Approximately 54 subjects will be enrolled to have 47 evaluable subjects (calculated dropout range 15%). ChloraSolv will be applied 1-2 times per week for 12 weeks or until the wound is deemed clean, whichever occurs first i.e. End of Treatment. A Follow-up visit for wound status evaluation will be performed 6 weeks from End of Treatment. Total time in investigation will be maximum 12+6 weeks. Subjects will attend a baseline visit to assess eligibility and collect demographic and baseline data and initiate treatment. Photographs of the wound pre and post debridement will be taken at baseline, every week during the treatment period, at End of Treatment and at the Follow-up visit. Photographs will be used to calculate (by PictZar digital planimetry system) the area of devitalized tissue in the wound as well as wound size and calculation of volume. Wound depth and undermining will be estimated by the investigator at all investigational visits. A treatment diary will be used in-between the weekly investigational visits to collect any further treatments. The treatment diary will also be filled-in during the follow-up period of 6 weeks.
The primary objective of the study is to assess tolerability and adherence to treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid
Measuring the rate of cerebral protein synthesis (rCPS) may enable us to better-understand the progression of Alzheimer's Disease (AD). This study is using a new method of measuring rCPS non-invasively, and to offer new approaches to the assessment of new therapeutic strategies in clinical trials. Previous studies have established the utility of [11C]-Leucine PET to assess the rCPS. This study will use [11C]- Leucine PET to measure rCPS in AD patients versus age-matched and young healthy subjects to determine whether a measurable difference exists. The study will involve participants receiving up to two PET scans, a structural MRI scan. The PET scanning procedures will involve some withdrawal of blood samples. The ultimate goal of this proposal is to indicate new routes for treatment of AD.
Phase 2b/3 double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to assess safety and efficacy of SLS-005 (trehalose injection, 90.5 mg/mL for intravenous infusion) for the treatment of adults with spinocerebellar ataxia).