There are about 36633 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in France. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, including clinical remission of guselkumab subcutaneous (SC) induction compared to placebo in participants with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC).
To compare the level of circulating functional mitochondria in the serum of vitiligo patients as compared to controls
This phase 2 trial will evaluate the effects of EP547 in subjects with cholestatic pruritus due to Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) or Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC)
Total hip arthroplasty is the preferred treatment for hip disease (primary or secondary osteoarthritis, osteonecrosis, for example) and femoral neck fractures. HYPE SCS stems are intended to be used for primary total hip arthroplasties to reduce pain and restore joint mobility of the hip. Clinical data for HYPE SCS available are not deemed sufficient to support performance and benefits claimed on the whole lifetime of the product. Thus, in order to maintain compliance with the EU regulation (2017/745) relating to medical devices and following MEDDEV 2.7.1.guidelines, SERF has set up post-market clinical follow-ups (PMCF). This PMCF study aims to generate clinical data in order to confirm these performance of HYPE SCS Stem associated to NOVAE Sunfit TH acetabular cup. In the meantime, through complications faced over the entire period of the study, risks related to the implantation of HYPE SCS stems will be assessed at medium term (5 years). It should be noted that this patient cohort reflects the usual medical care of Hospital Center "J. Monod" of Flers.
The use of cementless femoral stems is known to provide satisfactory long-term clinical results. Extensive and durable osseointegration of these implants has been reported in numerous series, despite the use of stems with different geometry and coating distribution. This study will validate the performance and safety of the HYPE (SERF) stems in the context of the 93/42/EEC directive and in relation to the recommendations of the MEDDEV 2.7.1 (Guideline for post-marketing follow-up), which provides for a systematic procedure for monitoring clinical data in order to verify the performance claimed for medical devices.
Staphylococcus aureus is a frequent cause of primary or secondary bacteremia. It is also responsible for many cases of infective endocarditis, for which the therapeutic management is specific. The frequency of infective endocarditis among Staphylococcus aureus bacteremias varies between 2.7% and 23.4%. Many factors associated with the risk of developing endocarditis in patients with S. aureus bacteremia have been described. Two parameters of potential interest remain excluded from this work: blood culture growth time, a marker of bacterial inoculum, and the presence of bacteriuria, which is common during bacteremia. The objective of this study is to evaluate the interest of these two parameters in the prediction of the presence of endocarditis during S. aureus bacteremia. Investigators will conduct a retrospective study including all patients managed for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and in whom a urine culture was performed. The primary objective is to describe the factors associated with the occurrence of endocarditis in patients managed for S. aureus bacteremia and who received a urine cytobacteriological examination (UCE). The secondary objectives are: to evaluate the factors associated with the occurrence of S. aureus bacteriuria in patients with S. aureus bacteremia and to evaluate the risk factors for mortality in patients managed for S. aureus bacteremia.
Cancer is a condition where cells in a specific part of body grow and reproduce uncontrollably. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a solid tumor, a disease in which cancer cells form in the tissues of the lung. The purpose of this study is to determine how telisotuzumab vedotin affects the disease state in adult participants with previously untreated participants with MET amplified non-squamous NSCLC. Change in disease activity will be assessed. Telisotuzumab vedotin is an investigational drug being developed for the treatment of MET amplified non-squamous NSCLC. Participants receive intravenously (IV) infused of telisotuzumab vedotin. Approximately 70 adult participants with previously untreated MET amplified locally advanced/metastatic non-squamous NSCLC will be enrolled in the study in approximately 110 sites worldwide. Participants will receive IV telisotuzumab vedotin every 2 weeks until meeting study drug discontinuation criteria. There may be higher treatment burden for participants in this trial compared to their standard of care. Participants will attend regular visits during the study at a hospital or clinic. The effect of the treatment will be checked by medical assessments, blood tests, checking for side effects and completing questionnaires.
The three main pathways of colorectal carcinogenesis are chromosomal instability, microsatellite instability (MSI) (15% of colorectal cancers =CRCs) and CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP). MSI CRCs are associated with a better prognosis after curative surgery than CRCs without microsatellite instability (MSS). In contrast, MSI CRCs do not appear to benefit from adjuvant 5-FU chemotherapy, unlike patients with MSS CRCs. Nevertheless, the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFOX seems to be retained. The identification of prognostic markers in this subgroup of patients is therefore essential to decide on adjuvant chemotherapy, the efficacy of which is currently debated in MSI CRC. To date, there are very few data concerning metastatic MSI CRC. Metastatic forms are rare (about 5% of metastatic CRCs), but are thought to be associated with chemoresistance and poor prognosis. Nevertheless, data are very sparse and there are no data regarding the use of modern chemotherapies and targeted therapies in metastatic MSI CRC. Thus, it is important to characterize the chemosensitivity of metastatic forms. Clinical predictors of recurrence after curative CRC surgery are known but have only been studied in MSI CRC retrospectively. Similarly, many molecular and immunohistochemical factors, prognostic or predictive of response to adjuvant chemotherapy, have been recently identified in CRC (KRAS, BRAF, TP53, PI3KCA mutations, CIMP phenotype, SMAD4, immune response...). Most of these markers have been studied in all CRCs, but not specifically in the MSI CRC subgroup. All these prognostic and/or predictive biomarkers need to be better characterized in a large cohort of MSI CRCs.
The most severe infectious episodes are managed in intensive care. Classically, a distinction is made between sepsis, an infection associated with an inappropriate, excessive response of the immune system, responsible for organ dysfunction, and septic shock, during which, within the potential dysfunctions, hemodynamic alteration is central, requiring the introduction of catecholamines. The seriousness of these disorders, particularly because of their potential short-term severity, requires immediate treatment. The treatment of severe infections is based on the control of microbial proliferation, particularly bacterial. In this context, the speed of antibiotic therapy is associated with patient prognosis. If the administration of antibiotic therapy is an emergency during severe infections, particularly in situations of septic shock, its choice is decisive in the effectiveness of management and in the prognosis of the patient. Prior to microbiological results, antibacterial treatment is probabilistic. In spite of these numerous parameters, failure of probabilistic antibiotic therapy, due to a spectrum unsuited to the pathogens, is described in 15 to 30% of cases. In order to limit the risk of inappropriate treatment, it is recommended that broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy be used in states of shock of infectious origin. Because of their bactericidal properties, their kinetics of effectiveness, their marked post-antibiotic effect, their bioavailability in the plasma sector, and their synergy with beta-lactams, aminoglycosides are often recommended in combination in the initial probabilistic treatment. Despite numerous studies and extensive international experience with aminoglycosides, their real value in the management of severe infections remains uncertain, leading to contradictory information depending on whether one is interested in their benefit in the treatment of identified infections or in the probabilistic treatment of severe conditions. During the management of severe intensive care patients, the pharmacokinetics of drugs, especially antibiotics, are considerably modified. As a result, monitoring of plasma, or better, tissue concentrations of antibiotics is suggested by learned societies, although their practical realization is still very limited by numerous obstacles. Misuse of aminoglycosides is associated with a risk of acute renal failure, centered on the tubular toxicity of the antibiotic. While the risks associated with inappropriate frequency of administration are currently modest, those associated with high peak concentration, responsible for an increase in the duration of renal exposure, are not well known. COVID-19 is also associated with a high risk of impaired renal function. The effect of aminoglycoside administration in the context of COVID-19 remains unknown. Our goal is to determine whether the presence of COVID-19 associates with an elevated risk of renal failure when prescribing aminoglycoside.
Despite important therapeutic advances, pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains one of the cancers with a high mortality rate (4th leading cause of cancer death in the US in 2021), poor prognosis (5-year overall survival rate of 10%) and increasing incidence. Patients are often metastatic from the start or at an advanced stage at diagnosis, making curative treatment difficult to envisage. Although the gold standard of treatment for resecable pancreatic adenocarcinoma is initial surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, considerable interest has emerged in a treatment strategy involving neoadjuvant therapy in patients at high risk for positive resection margins (R1) on initial imaging workup. The assessment of response to neoadjuvant therapy is complex, especially for the evaluation of vascular invasion with a high risk of overestimating residual invasion after neoadjuvant therapy. Accurate assessment of tumor size before and after neoadjuvant treatment is therefore crucial to identify good responders (according to RECIST 1.1 criteria) and thus improve the selection of patients who can benefit from curative surgery with healthy resection margins (R0). In clinical practice, tumor size assessment is performed by injected computed tomography (CT). The latter has certain advantages in terms of technical reproducibility, but has a number of limitations. Indeed, the delineation of the tumor mass in CT seems to be subject to a significant inter-observer variability. The same is true for vascular invasion. CT also seems to underestimate the size of the tumor compared to the anatomopathological examination of the surgical specimen. On the other hand, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has been shown to be superior to CT in tumor detectability and diagnosis of malignancy in the presence of an indeterminate pancreatic mass. It has also been shown that tumor size, whether measured in diameter or volume, is frequently underestimated on CT compared to multiparametric MRI or pathological examination of the resection specimen. In the latest recommendations of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), MRI is indicated at diagnosis in non-metastatic patients with indeterminate liver lesions on CT, or as a second-line alternative to CT for re-evaluation after neo-adjuvant therapy in patients with resectable or borderline resectable disease according to the NCCN classification. However, MRI is increasingly performed routinely in some centers, both at diagnosis and at re-evaluation after neo-adjuvant therapy. The question of which imaging modality between CT and multiparametric MRI is the most reproducible in terms of tumor size measurement becomes important, especially in the evaluation of the response to neoadjuvant therapy. A few studies have investigated the interobserver variability of tumor size measurement in CT versus MRI in the context of radiotherapy management for the delineation of an irradiation field, but to date investigators have not found any study evaluating the interobserver variability of tumor size measurement using RECIST criteria before and after neoadjuvant treatment for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.