There are about 25560 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Germany. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The aim of this study is to develop, implement and evaluate the effects of a 16 week practice orientated sports nutrition education and counselling program aiming to improve energy availability and to investigate the effects on physiological and psychological health, sports nutrition knowledge, and athletic performance in well-trained female endurance athletes with risk of RED-S. The FUEL (in Norwegian: Forstå Utholdenhetsidretts Ernæring - et Læringsprogram; in English: Food and nUtrition for Endurance athletes - a Learning program) recovery program consists of virtual lectures with central themes within sports nutrition in addition to individual consultations.
In this study, the tetravalent bioconjugate candidate vaccine Kleb4V will be tested to obtain first-time-in-human (FTIH) data on its safety and immunogenicity in healthy adults.
Cardiac surgery is a complex operative procedure with a substantial risk of postoperative complications, so that patients undergoing valve surgery are usually transferred to the intensive care unit postoperatively. Various substances are used to maintain the required sedation, such as volatile anaesthetics and intravenous sedatives combined with analgetic therapy using opioids. The study intends to investigate to what extent the already well-described effect of volatile anaesthetics on recovery can be realised despite the need for differentiated intensive care and medical management.
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of study drug known as LY3209590 compared to insulin glargine administered in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Side effects and tolerability will be documented. The study will last almost six months and 21 visits for each participant including screening period.
This study is about teenagers and adults with hereditary angioedema (HAE) type I and type II. In this study, the burden of illness means the impact of HAE in terms of long-term health outcomes and the financial cost. The main aims of this study are as follows: - to learn how often, how severe and where on the body HAE attacks occur. - to describe how HAE prophylaxis and on-demand medicines are prescribed and used. (Prophylaxis medicines prevent a bleed from happening and on-demand medicines treat a bleed when it occurs.) This study is about collecting data only; participants will not receive treatment as part of this study. Existing data available in the participant's medical records will be collected. Participants will be asked to complete an electronic questionnaire either on a website or by using an app on their mobile phone; data from this questionnaire will also be collected. Participants do not need to visit their doctor in addition to their normal visits.
Substudy A: The study will evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of a booster dose of BNT162b2 when administered to participants having previously received 2 doses of BNT162b2 at least 6 months prior to randomization. The study is designed to describe vaccine efficacy of a booster dose of BNT162b2 over time against COVID-19 - At a dose of 30µg (as studied in the Phase 2/3 study C4591001) - In healthy adults 16 years of age and older - The duration of the study for each participant will be up to approximately 12 months. - The study will be conducted in the United States, Brazil and South Africa Substudy B: The study will assess the safety and tolerability of a single dose of BNT162b2 as compared to placebo control, through the potential analysis of serum troponin levels, in participants ≥12 and ≤30 years of age who have received 2 or 3 prior doses of BNT162b2 (30-µg doses) with their last dose at least 4 months (120 days) prior to randomization. - Blood samples will be collected for troponin testing - The duration of the study for each participant will be up to approximately 2 months. - The study will be conducted in the United States, Germany, Poland and South Africa Substudy C: The study will assess the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a booster (third) dose of BNT162b2 at doses of 10 µg or 30 µg in participants who have completed a 2-dose primary series of BNT162b2 (30 µg doses) at least 5 months (150 days) prior to randomization. - In healthy adults 12 years of age and older - The duration of the study for each participant will be up to approximately 12 months. - The study will be conducted in the United States, Germany and South Africa Substudy D: The study will assess the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a 2-dose primary series of BNT162b2 OMI, and as a booster (third, fourth or fifth) dose - Participants in Cohort 1 will have completed a 2-dose primary series of BNT162b2 (30-µg doses), with their last dose 90 to 240 days prior to enrolment - Participants in Cohort 2 will be enrolled from Study C4591001 and C4591031 Substudy A and will have completed a 2-dose primary series and received a single booster (third) dose of BNT162b2, with their last dose 90 to 180 days prior to randomization - Participants in Cohort 3 who are COVID-19 vaccine-naïve and have not experienced COVID-19 will be enrolled to receive 2 doses (primary series) of BNT162b2 OMI, 3 weeks apart, with a dose of BNT162b2 approximately 5 months (150 days) later. If participants do not consent to receive BNT162b2 as a third dose, they will not receive a third dose. No participants should receive BNT162b2 OMI as a third dose. - In healthy adults 18 to 55 years of age - The duration of the study for each participant will be up to approximately 12 months. - The study will be conducted in the United States and South Africa Substudy E: This study will assess the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of high-dose BNT162b2 (60 µg), high-dose BNT162b2 OMI (60 µg), and a high-dose combination of BNT162b2 and BNT162b2 OMI at 60 µg (30 µg each), given as a single dose - In healthy adults 18 years of age and older who have received 3 prior doses of BNT162b2 (30 µg) with the most recent dose being 5 to 12 months (150 to 360 days) prior to randomization - The duration of the study for each participant will be approximately 6 months. - The study will be conducted in the United States Substudy F: This study will assess the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of high-dose BNT162b2 (60 µg), high-dose BNT162b2 OMI (60 µg), and a high-dose combination of BNT162b2 and BNT162b2 OMI at 60 µg (30 µg each), given as a single dose. - In healthy adults 60 years of age and older who have received 3 prior doses of BNT162b2 (30 µg) with the most recent dose being ≥4 months prior to randomization - The duration of the study for each participant will be approximately 6 months. - The study will be conducted in Israel
This is an observational, multicentre, prospective, post-market product registry for participants with AF for whom ablation by the commercially available Globe Mapping and Ablation System was indicated before enrolment into the registry. The aim of the registry is to confirm the clinical performance and safety of the Globe Mapping and Ablation System in a real-life setting.
The indication of this study is To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a SARSCoV- 2-derived multi-peptide vaccine in combination with the TLR1/2 ligand XS15 in adults with congenital or acquired B-cell/antibody deficiency
A Prospective, Multicenter, Non-Randomized, Single-Arm, Open-Label Clinical Study to Demonstrate the Safety and Effectiveness of the ShortCut™ device for splitting bioprosthetic aortic valve leaflets in patients who are presented for a valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedure for an approved ViV indication, and who are at risk for TAVR-induced coronary artery ostium obstruction.
Many interventions in the field of meditation are becoming increasingly popular and have gained worldwide acceptance over the past years, both in terms of health, but also psychological aspects. On the other hand, controversial and sometimes hypercritical positions are on the rise, questioning the positive effects of meditation on health due to the limited availability of high-quality scientific data. With regard to a large number of meditation interventions, the systematic exploration of procedures that have not yet been scientifically evaluated - also in online settings - is a meaningful contribution to meditation research.