There are about 13446 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Belgium. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
In this prospective pilot study, the effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in post-cardiac arrest syndrome will be evaluated. However, the primary outcome of this pilot study will be the feasibility of this approach. If feasibility is determined, a larger study with adequate powering is to follow.
This is a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, open-label, global study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of inavolisib plus fulvestrant compared with alpelisib plus fulvestrant in patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -negative, PIK3CA-mutated, locally advanced (LA) or metastatic breast cancer (mBC), who progressed during or after cyclin dependent kinase 4/6i (CDK4/6i)-based therapy.
The goal of this clinical trial is to test the quality of the performance of opportunistic salpingectomies in women scheduled for adnexectomy. The main questions it aims to answer are: - How many salpingectomies are incomplete? - Are there any factors related to incomplete resection? Could the investigators develop a instruction video to optimize the surgical technique? Participants planned for uni-or bilateral adnexectomy (removal of ovary and salpinx) will have their adnexectomy in two steps in the same surgical episode: first the salpingectomy (removal of the salpinx), then the oophorectomy (the removal of the ovary).
The goal of this prospective, observational, multicentre cohort study is to assess the trajectory of the experiences (both positive and negative) and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of informal caregivers of patients who start home dialysis, and compare these to experiences and HRQOL of informal caregivers of patients who start in-centre hemodialysis. The investigators hypothesise that informal caregivers of home dialysis patients experience more positive experiences, but also more negative experiences, and still have better HRQoL, compared with caregivers of in-centre HD patients. Participants will fill in five different validated questionnaires and questions on required support. Participants are asked to fill in the questionnaires after inclusion (i.e., start of dialysis), and at 6 and 12 months after start dialysis.
This is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in which patients with major depressive disorder will receive augmentation through minocycline (MCO), celecoxib (CXB) or placebo.
This clinical trial aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the lnDx Implant in the treatment of thumb base joint arthritis. This clinical trial hypothesises that implanting the lnDx prosthesis will improve thumb opposition motion, decrease pain and stiffness, and increase grip and pinch strengths of the carpometacarpal joint in patients with thumb base joint arthritis. Participants will undergo the following measures to assess their clinical performance: - Hand X-Ray - Range of Motion - Kapandji opposition score - Grip strength, lateral pinch and tip pinch - Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain - Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire
Besides being at least as effective as prasugrel in inhibiting platelet aggregation, ticagrelor has been shown to have additional properties potentially affecting coronary microcirculation. We sought to compare the effects of ticagrelor and prasugrel on absolute coronary blood flow (Q) and microvascular resistance (R) in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The PROMICRO-3 study shows that in patients with stable CAD undergoing PCI pre-treatment with a loading dose of ticagrelor compared with prasugrel improves post-procedural coronary flow and microvascular function and seems to reduce the related myocardial injury.
Researchers are looking for a better way to treat people with atrial fibrillation and prevent stroke or systemic embolism (blood clots travelling through the blood stream to plug another vessel). Atrial fibrillation is a condition of having irregular and often rapid heartbeat. It can lead to the formation of blood clots in the heart which can travel through the blood stream to plug another vessel, and like this lead to serious and life-threatening conditions, such as a stroke. A stroke occurs because the brain tissue beyond the blockage no longer receives nutrients and oxygen so that brain cells die. As strokes arising from atrial fibrillation can involve extensive areas of the brain, it is important to prevent them. Blood clots are formed in a process known as coagulation. Medications are already available to prevent the formation of blood clots. When taken by mouth (orally), they are known as oral anticoagulants (OACs) including apixaban. OACs decrease the risk of the above-mentioned serious and life-threatening conditions. The main side effect of OACs is an increase of the risk of bleeding. The study treatment asundexian is a new type of anticoagulant currently under development to provide further treatment options. Asundexian aims to further improve the standard of care with regard to the risk of bleeding. The main purpose of this study is to collect more data about how well asundexian works to prevent stroke and systemic embolism and how safe it is compared to apixaban in people with atrial fibrillation and at high risk for stroke. To see how well the study treatment asundexian works researchers compare: - how long asundexian works well and - how long apixaban works well after the start of the treatment. Working well means that the treatments can prevent the following from happening: - stroke and/or - systemic embolism. The study will keep collecting data until a certain number of strokes or embolisms happen in the study. To see how safe asundexian is, the researchers will compare how often major bleedings occur after taking the study treatments asundexian and apixaban, respectively. Major bleedings are bleedings that have a serious or even life-threatening impact on a person's health. The study participants will be randomly (by chance) assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups, A and B. Dependent on the treatment group, the participants will either take the study treatment asundexian by mouth once a day or apixaban by mouth twice a day for approximately 9 - 33 months. Each participant will be in the study for approximately 9 - 34 months. There will be visits to the study site every 3 to 6 months and up to 7 phone calls. Those participants who do not want or are unable to have visits to the study site may join the study remotely in selected locations. The location name contains the abbreviation - DCT in such cases. During the study, the study team will: - take blood samples - do physical examinations - examine heart health using an electrocardiogram (ECG) - check vital signs such as blood pressure and heart rate - do pregnancy tests - ask the participants questions about their quality of life - ask the participants questions about how they are feeling and what adverse events they are having. An adverse event is any medical problem that a participant has during a study. Doctors keep track of all adverse events that happen in studies, even if they do not think the adverse events might be related to the study treatments.
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 90% of primary liver cancers and represents a growing health problem worldwide. Most patients present locally advanced disease and are candidates for palliative transarterial locoregional treatment. Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) using 90Y has been used for more than a decade for patients with advanced disease. The use of 166Ho could offer a more personalized approach in terms of imaging and dosimetry. Aim: to evaluate the feasibility and safety of TARE using 166Ho in a selected population of HCC patients and assess the biological peripheral response to this therapy. Materials and methods: In this open-label, prospective, non-randomized, singlecenter pilot study, 20 patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma will undergo TARE using 166Ho. The primary outcome is the feasibility of 166Ho radioembolization as well as the assessment of safety and toxicity profiles (CTAE V5.0). Secondary outcomes include the evaluation of efficacy of 166Ho radioembolization in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, according to mRECIST and metabolic criteria, as well as the impact on the tumor marker alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), assessment of biodistribution/dosimetry using a "scout dose" and time to progression (TTP). A substudy will assess the hepatic function using 99mTc-IDA hepato-biliary scintigraphy (HBS) and the comparison between "pre-scout" HBS and HBS just after "scout dose". Finally, blood samples will be collected at different time points in order to explore the biological peripheral response to these therapies. Perspectives: The newly developed 166Ho-microspheres have distinctive advantages over the existing 90Ymicrospheres with improved dosimetry that represents a prerequisite for optimal safety and efficacy.
The aim of the study is to determine whether there is a statistically significant difference in snoring intensity before and after performing a Barbed Reposition Pharyngoplasty as a single-level snoring procedure. The investigators aim to determine whether this is a valid alternative to the more classical techniques of pharyngoplasty. Furthermore, the investigators also wish to map the various postoperative complications and compare them with those of the more conventional techniques. The investigators compare the snoring intensity before surgery with the snoring intensity at 2 weeks (first postoperative control), at 6 weeks (second postoperative control) and at 6 months (Third postoperative control). For the evaluation of snoring, the investigators use 4 scales/questionnaires. These questionnaires are currently also used as standard at the outpatient clinic for snoring problems. These 4 scales/questionnaires are completed at every check-up. During the first postoperative check-up, the postoperative side effects are checked (bleeding, infection, readmission, needed consultation with another doctor, date of resumption of work). The investigators also map the pain with a visual analog scale and measure this the day after the operation and let the patient fill it in 3 days, 1 week and 2 weeks after the operation.