Coronary Artery Disease Clinical Trial
— GEOMETRY-CTAOfficial title:
Assessment of Coronary Artery Geometry With Coronary CT Angiography: Evaluation of Atherosclerotic Plaque Burden and Composition
The purpose of this study is to investigate the potential association of coronary artery geometry, based on coronary CT angiography (CCTA), with the complexity and the severity of coronary atherosclerosis.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 100 |
Est. completion date | September 2021 |
Est. primary completion date | June 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Patients referred for cardiac CT angiography - Patients without previous history of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) - Age = 18 years - Patients giving voluntary written consent to participate in the study Exclusion Criteria: - Pregnancy or breast-feeding - Patients with serious concurrent disease and life expectancy of < 1 year - Patients with a previous history of CAD - Patients who refuse to give written consent for participation in the study |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Greece | AHEPA University Hospital, Department of Cardiology | Thessaloníki |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki |
Greece,
Antoniadis AP, Giannopoulos AA, Wentzel JJ, Joner M, Giannoglou GD, Virmani R, Chatzizisis YS. Impact of local flow haemodynamics on atherosclerosis in coronary artery bifurcations. EuroIntervention. 2015;11 Suppl V:V18-22. doi: 10.4244/EIJV11SVA4. Review. — View Citation
Benetos G, Buechel RR, Gonçalves M, Benz DC, von Felten E, Rampidis GP, Clerc OF, Messerli M, Giannopoulos AA, Gebhard C, Fuchs TA, Pazhenkottil AP, Kaufmann PA, Gräni C. Coronary artery volume index: a novel CCTA-derived predictor for cardiovascular events. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Apr;36(4):713-722. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01750-2. Epub 2020 Jan 1. — View Citation
Benz DC, Benetos G, Rampidis G, von Felten E, Bakula A, Sustar A, Kudura K, Messerli M, Fuchs TA, Gebhard C, Pazhenkottil AP, Kaufmann PA, Buechel RR. Validation of deep-learning image reconstruction for coronary computed tomography angiography: Impact on noise, image quality and diagnostic accuracy. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2020 Jan 13. pii: S1934-5925(19)30464-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2020.01.002. [Epub ahead of print] — View Citation
Ferencik M. About the twists and turns: Relationship of coronary artery geometry and atherosclerosis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2018 May - Jun;12(3):261-262. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 Apr 24. — View Citation
Giannopoulos AA, Benz DC, Gräni C, Buechel RR. Imaging the event-prone coronary artery plaque. J Nucl Cardiol. 2019 Feb;26(1):141-153. doi: 10.1007/s12350-017-0982-0. Epub 2017 Jul 6. — View Citation
Kolossváry M, Szilveszter B, Merkely B, Maurovich-Horvat P. Plaque imaging with CT-a comprehensive review on coronary CT angiography based risk assessment. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017 Oct;7(5):489-506. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2016.11.06. Review. — View Citation
Pflederer T, Ludwig J, Ropers D, Daniel WG, Achenbach S. Measurement of coronary artery bifurcation angles by multidetector computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 2006 Nov;41(11):793-8. — View Citation
Rampidis GP, Benetos G, Benz DC, Giannopoulos AA, Buechel RR. A guide for Gensini Score calculation. Atherosclerosis. 2019 Aug;287:181-183. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2019.05.012. Epub 2019 May 10. — View Citation
Toutouzas K, Benetos G, Karanasos A, Chatzizisis YS, Giannopoulos AA, Tousoulis D. Vulnerable plaque imaging: updates on new pathobiological mechanisms. Eur Heart J. 2015 Dec 1;36(45):3147-54. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv508. Epub 2015 Sep 28. Review. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Left Main Coronary Artery (LMCA) angle of take-off from the aortic root | Measurement using curved Multiplanar Reconstruction (MPR) technique in advantage workstation server | 30 days | |
Primary | Right Coronary Artery (RCA) angle of take-off from the aortic root | Measurement using curved MPR technique in advantage workstation server | 30 days | |
Primary | Left Anterior Descending (LAD) / Left Circumflex (LCx) bifurcation angle | Measurement using curved MPR technique in advantage workstation server | 30 days | |
Primary | Indexed Coronary Volume | Calculated by dividing the total coronary volume to the left ventricle mass, both derived from CCTA (mm3/gr) | 30 days | |
Secondary | Extent of Coronary Atherosclerosis | Total atherosclerotic plaque volume (mm3) | 30 days | |
Secondary | Severity of Coronary Atherosclerosis assessed by using Leiden CTA risk score | Leiden CTA risk score incorporates the presence, extent, severity, location, and composition of coronary artery disease (CAD). Leiden CTA score is calculated using the following approach. First, the presence of CAD is determined in each segment. When plaque is absent the score is 0. When plaque is present a score of 1.1, 1.2 or 1.3 is given according to plaque composition (calcified, noncalcified, and mixed plaque, respectively). Subsequently, this score is multiplied by a weight factor for the location of the segment in the coronary artery tree (0.5 through 6 according to vessel, proximal location and system dominance) and multiplied by a weight factor for stenosis severity (1.4 for =50% stenosis and 1.0 for stenosis <50%). The final score (range 0 to 42) is calculated by addition of the individual segment scores. | 30 days | |
Secondary | Severity of Coronary Atherosclerosis assessed by using Gensini score | The relative severity of a lesion is indicated using a score of 1 for 1-25% obstruction and doubling that number as the severity of obstruction progresses with each step in the 25-50-75-90-99-100% diameter reduction. Thus, the severity score for each lesion may range from 1 to 32. Furthermore, the score weighed according to the usual blood flow to the left ventricle in each vessel or vessel segment. A multiplying factor is applied to each lesion score based upon its location in the coronary tree, depending on the functional significance of the area supplied by that segment. If a segment is totally occluded or 99% stenosed and receiving collaterals, a collateral adjustment factor is used, and the adjustment is reduced by the extent of disease in the vessel that is the source of collaterals. The final score is the sum of all the lesion scores. | 30 days | |
Secondary | Complexity of Coronary Artery Disease [CT-SYNTAX score] | CCTA-derived SYNTAX score (CT-SYNTAX score) is a lesion-based grading tool to characterise the coronary vasculature with respect to the number of lesions and their functional impact, location, and complexity. Higher SYNTAX scores, indicative of more complex disease, are hypothesized to represent a bigger therapeutic challenge and to have potentially worse prognosis. | 30 days | |
Secondary | Frequency of occurrence of high-risk plaques | Frequency (%) of occurrence of high-risk plaque features (HU < 30, Remodelling Index > 1.1, napkin-ring sign & spotty calcium) | 30 days | |
Secondary | Plaque burden assessment [Modified Duke CAD Index for coronary CTA] | Patients are assigned a risk score between 0-100 based on former patient prognosis data. The score is an extension of the 3-vessel disease score. It also incorporates stenosis severity and calculates with left main stenosis and proximal left anterior descending stenosis. There is a significant difference between patients' cumulative survival for the different categories. Left main plaque with any additional moderate or severe stenosis indicates the worst outcome. | 30 days |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT06030596 -
SPECT Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease Determined by Fraction Flow Reserve
|
||
Completed |
NCT04080700 -
Korean Prospective Registry for Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Distal Radial Approach (KODRA)
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03810599 -
Patient-reported Outcomes in the Bergen Early Cardiac Rehabilitation Study
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06002932 -
Comparison of PROVISIONal 1-stent Strategy With DEB Versus Planned 2-stent Strategy in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions.
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06032572 -
Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the VRS100 System in PCI (ESSENCE)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04242134 -
Drug-coating Balloon Angioplasties for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05308719 -
Nasal Oxygen Therapy After Cardiac Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04556994 -
Phase 1 Cardiac Rehabilitation With and Without Lower Limb Paddling Effects in Post CABG Patients.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05846893 -
Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Drug-Eluting Stent for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Large Coronary Artery Disease
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06027788 -
CTSN Embolic Protection Trial
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05023629 -
STunning After Balloon Occlusion
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04941560 -
Assessing the Association Between Multi-dimension Facial Characteristics and Coronary Artery Diseases
|
||
Completed |
NCT04006288 -
Switching From DAPT to Dual Pathway Inhibition With Low-dose Rivaroxaban in Adjunct to Aspirin in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01860274 -
Meshed Vein Graft Patency Trial - VEST
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06174090 -
The Effect of Video Education on Pain, Anxiety and Knowledge Levels of Coronary Bypass Graft Surgery Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03968809 -
Role of Cardioflux in Predicting Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Outcomes
|
||
Terminated |
NCT03959072 -
Cardiac Cath Lab Staff Radiation Exposure
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04566497 -
Assessment of Adverse Outcome in Asymptomatic Patients With Prior Coronary Revascularization Who Have a Systematic Stress Testing Strategy Or a Non-testing Strategy During Long-term Follow-up.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05065073 -
Iso-Osmolar vs. Low-Osmolar Contrast Agents for Optical Coherence Tomography
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT05096442 -
Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Genoss® DCB and SeQuent® Please NEO in Korean Patients With Coronary De Novo Lesions
|
N/A |