View clinical trials related to Colorectal Cancer.
Filter by:Conduct a feasibility pilot RCT of a newly developed colorectal cancer screening (CRC) decision aid (DA) including 66 LHL adults 76-85 years recruited from community health centers. Hypotheses: Patients in the intervention group will be more likely to change their intentions to be screened with fewer patients with <10 year LE and/or those with >10 year LE and no risk factors intending to be screened and more with >10 year LE and risk factors for CRC and/or those who have never been screened intending to be screened (primary outcome). The secondary outcomes are that the patients in the intervention group will have 1. increased knowledge of CRC screening options and the benefits and risks of these options; 2. increased SDM engagement; and 3. find the DA acceptable. Investigators also anticipate that at least 50% of eligible participants will choose to participate in the study.
A quasi-experimental non-randomized pre/post with control group trial of two models of cancer survivorship care in early-stage colorectal and breast cancer survivors cared for in a community-based, integrated health care setting.
To explore the effect of CBT on psychological status of colorectal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. To explore the effect of CBT on immune function of colorectal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.
This study will be a prospective analysis conducted by Geneoscopy Inc. to evaluate the Colosense test, which is a multi-target stool RNA test for colorectal screening.
A randomised feasibility study into the use of endoscopic visualisation of rectal anastomosis vs. current practice and the effect on anastomotic leak rates in patients undergoing rectal surgery for bowel cancer in a tertiary referral centre
Near-infrared fluorescence-guided oncologic surgery (FGOS) with the use of a tumor specific tracer (SGM-101) developed by Surgimab can provide valuable intra-operative information about tumor location and extensiveness. SGM-101 already proven to be safe and valuable in colorectal cancer. This study aims to prove feasibility for colorectal lung metastases.
This study was conducted as a randomized controlled trial in order to determine the effect of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy for the prevention of surgical site complications in high-risk colorectal cancer surgery. Hypothesis: Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy applied after open colorectal cancer surgery to high-risk patients affects surgical wound complications. pNBYT group: The study was completed with a total of 50 patients, 24 of intervention group anda 26 of the control group, who met the inclusion criteria at the surgical oncology service of a university hospital. The data were collected using Patient Identification Form, Surgical Procedure Form, Wound Follow-up Chart and ASEPSİS Wound Scoring System. Ethics committee approval and written informed consent of the individuals was taken in the research. The data were analyzed in SPSS Statistics 24.0 program using Shapiro Wilk test and Q-Q graphs, Independent Sample t test, Mann Whitney U test, Chi-square, Cochran's Q and Friedman test. The value of p<0.05 was accepted for the statistical significance level. It was determined that the groups were similar in terms of identification and surgical procedure characteristics.
This is an open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 2 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib plus capecitabine versus bevacizumab plus capecitabine as maintenance therapy following first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients who have already achieved disease control (including CR/PR and SD), without discontinuation for toxicity, and are progression free after 4-6 months of standard first-line induction treatment will be assigned to 2 maintenance treatment groups by randomization in a 1:1 ratio to receive fruquintinib + capecitabine (Arm A) or bevacizumab + capecitabine (Arm B). The study contains a safety lead-in phase in which the safety and tolerability of fruquintinib + capecitabine will be assessed prior to the phase 2 portion of the study. All patients from Arm A and Arm B will be treated until progressive disease, death from any cause, unacceptable toxicity or informed consent withdrawal (whichever occurs earlier).
- Evaluation Of Glypican 3 in serum of colorectal cancer patients . - Correlation between Glypican 3 and clinicopathological characteristics of colorectal cancer .
In clinical practice, there are currently no biomarkers that can guide colorectal cancer treatment in the primary and curative setting. Improved biomarker-based adjuvant treatments would be of greatest value in order to reduce the risk of relapse. There are reasons to believe that measurements of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in plasma could be used to monitor minimal residual disease after surgery. To address this question, a pilot study was conducted with the purpose to demonstrate the feasibility to perform prospective profiling of ctDNA in a cohort of patients with colorectal cancer stage I-III using the already created Nordic infrastructure for clinical research built up for the ALASCCA trial. If the pilot study proves successful, a large randomised controlled Nordic multicenter study is planned where patients with positive ctDNA 4-6 weeks after radical surgery will be randomised to chemotherapy and/or a biologic agent.