View clinical trials related to Atrial Fibrillation.
Filter by:This is a multicenter, randomized controlled study. This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of LBBAP with traditional biventricular pacing in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation and heart Failure
Postoperative atrial fibrillation is quite common after cardiac surgery with up to 1 in 3 patients experiencing this abnormal heart rhythm. Amiodarone, a medication commonly used to treat atrial fibrillation, has been previously shown to be an effective prophylactic agent at decreasing the occurrence of postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery. However, despite many studies which have demonstrated its effectiveness, it has not been widely used due to the concern of side effects that can occur such as slow heart rate, low blood pressure, and lung toxicity. We have designed a study to test the effectiveness and safety of a short course of postoperative prophylactic amiodarone for patients undergoing non-coronary artery bypass cardiac surgery. We hypothesize that patients who receive the prophylactic amiodarone will have decreased rates of postoperative atrial fibrillation without significantly increased side effects compared to patients who receive the standard postoperative care after non-coronary artery bypass cardiac surgery.
This retrospective single-centre study aims to examine the success rate of concomitant surgical ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) with an up to eight years follow-up period. Moreover, the focus of this study was to identify variables which predict freedom from AF, such as the type of AF, lesion set performed, energy source used and the patient's characteristics.
We investigated in-vitro the management of intraprocedural anticoagulation in patients requiring immediate percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) while using regular direct oral anticoagulants(DOACs). Twenty-five patients taking 20mg of rivaroxaban once daily comprised the study group, while five healthy volunteers included the control group. In study group, a beginning(24-hours after the last rivaroxaban dose) examination was performed. Then, the effects of basal and four different anticoagulant doses(50IU/kg unfractionated heparin(UFH), 100IU/kg UFH, 0.5mg/kg enoxaparin, and 1mg/kg enoxaparin) on coagulation parameters were investigated at the 4th and 12th hours following rivaroxaban intake. Anticoagulant activity was assessed mainly by anti-factor Xa(anti-Xa) levels.
ß blocker and digoxin effect on left atrium reservoir function are unknown. This is a randomized open label study to compare the effect of theses two molecules on left atrium function
This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of the edoxaban and the warfarin in atrial fibrillation patients with mitral stenosis. The study design is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, investigator initiated phase 2 trial. The patients were randomly assigned to Edoxaban or Warfarin groups. Primary outcome was a composite of stroke and systemic arterial thromboembolism. The safety outcome was major bleeding.
Cather ablation of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is less effective compared to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Therefore, new techniques have been developed, such as high-density mapping to determine areas of focal and rotational activities. The aim is to assess the clinical efficacy of ablation focal and rotational activities, and to assess the relation between the areas of focal and rotational activities with fibrosis of both atria assessed using magnetic resonance.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common rhythm disturbance of the heart. It can affect people of any age but usually happens as we get older. It can cause palpitations, breathlessness, lethargy, and fainting attacks. It is also associated with an increased risk of strokes. The best treatment for it at the moment involves burning or freezing (ablation) the heart muscle in a part of the heart called the left atrium. The ablation injures the heart muscle around the so-called pulmonary veins and the procedure is called a 'pulmonary vein isolation'. This procedure work in about 60% of people. The study team have found that there are nerve endings in the heart that also cause AF and have shown that ablating these nerve endings also prevents AF. These Nerve endings are known as ganglionated plexuses (GPs). The study team would now like to perform a trial in people who still have AF after the usual pulmonary vein procedure. The study team hope that ablating the nerve endings that cause AF (GPs), we will stop their AF coming back. The study team will compare this procedure to the normal approach of doing the pulmonary vein isolation again
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Currently, Medtronic Arctic Front Cryoballoon is the most frequently used single shot technology and hence is the benchmark for upcoming technologies. A novel method, pulse-field ablation (PFA) using the FARAPULSE catheter, has recently been introduced (FARAPULSE PFA, Boston Scientific). However, whether FARAPULSE PFA provides effectiveness similar to the standard-of-practice Medtronic Arctic Front Cryoballoon is yet to be investigated. Given that FARAPULSE PFA has shown in studies not to cause any of the severe complications reported in association with traditional PVI while being highly effective, it might be even safer and more effective for use in AF ablation procedures. The aim of this trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of PVI using FARAPULSE PFA (Boston Scientific) and the Arctic Front Cryoballoon (Medtronic) in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF undergoing their first PVI. This is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized controlled, open-label trial with blinded endpoint adjudication. Given that the Medtronic Arctic Front Cryoballoon is the standard-of-practice for PVI and the FARAPULSE PFA is the novel technology, this trial has a non-inferiority design. The null hypothesis with regards to the primary efficacy endpoint is that the FARAPULSE PFA (Boston Scientific) shows lower efficacy compared to the Arctic Front Cryoballoon (Medtronic) and that therefore more episodes of first recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia between days 91 and 365 will be observed in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF undergoing their first PVI. Hence, the alternative hypothesis postulates that the FARAPULSE PFA is non-inferior to the Arctic Front Cryoballoon. Rejection of the null hypothesis is needed to conclude non-inferiority.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is fairly prevalent in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) with the prevalence estimated to be 3.8 - 27%. While it is reported that patient with peritoneal dialysis (PD) has a lower incidence of AF as compared to patient with haemodialysis (HD), the risk is still substantially higher than in the general population. AF is a known risk factor for embolic stroke and stroke causes significant morbidity and mortality. Anticoagulation in an effective treatment for the prevention of stroke in the general population. However, this is less clear in the ESRD populations. Despite the risk of stroke is higher than general population, the management of AF in patients with ESRD remains controversial with limited and often conflicting result for the use of traditional vitamin K antagonists. It also showed an increased risk of bleeding with the use in ESRD patients. With the advent of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), there is growing interest in advocating their uses and studies have been done to assess their safety profile. In fact, several randomized control trials are being performed. However, these studies are done in HD populations and there is no data for PD populations at all so far. Given the physiology of drug clearance is different between the two renal replacement modalities, the investigators purpose to assess the pharmacokinetics and the safety profile of Apixaban in PD populations. By establishing the pharmacokinetics and its safety profile, apixaban may be a more attractive option for anticoagulation for AF or other venous thrombotic indications in PD population.