View clinical trials related to Anesthesia, Local.
Filter by:To investigate the effect of liposomal bupivacaine compared with bupivacaine hydrochloride for intercostal blockades for patients undergoing Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.
Background: Needles are the most feared tools, making anaesthetic injection a worrying practice. Aim: To compare intraosseous (IOA) and needle-free dental anaesthesia (NFA) methods that painless anaesthesia. Design: Twenty patients aged 8-10 years were included in this cross-over study. To determine the anxiety levels and pain experienced by the patients, visual and behavior scales were used. The pulse rate (PR) and opiorphin levels (OL) determined. The Friedman and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used. p<0.05 was considered significant.
Wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) was proposed and performed in hand operations. Aim of this study is to present the use of WALANT in operations performed on the upper and lower limbs, evaluate its efficacy in terms of feasibility, total operation time, total operating room time, bleeding, patient discomfort and satisfaction and control for potential drawbacks. The hypothesis is that WALANT is a viable option in common operations performed by plastic surgeons on the upper and lower limbs.
evaluate the efficacy of the intravenous formulation of fentanyl citrate administered orally as a sedative premedication, we will compare it with oral midazolam, as a gold standard premedication, in paediatric congenital cardiac surgeries
Following labor, epidural or combined spinal-epidural (CSE) catheters are kept in place and deactivated. However, many women opt for procedures such as tubal ligation, which may require epidural anesthesia as a method of pain relief. Our study aims to confirm the ability to predict reactivation of epidural catheter in postpartum females through the electrical epidural stimulation test (EST) which was first described by the PI of this study approximately 20 years ago.
This study investigated the Dental Vibe Injection Comfort System (DV), developed to lessen anesthesia pain through pulsed vibration, a form of counter-stimulation. The study's aims were to evaluate DV's efficacy in reducing pain/discomfort from intra-oral long buccal (LB) and inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injections and the time needed to achieve complete anesthesia during an IAN block.
In outpatient hand surgery, 40% of patients report moderate to severe pain within 24 hours of the operation. Effective pain management is therefore essential to ensure a comfortable and safe return home for the patient. Loco-regional anesthesia is the optimal method of analgesia for complex hand surgery. It involves the injection of a local anesthetic (LA) near the nerves responsible for the sensitivity of the arm. Following a single injection of long-acting local anesthetic, the maximum duration of analgesia is limited to approximately 13 hours, with great variability between individuals. In order to provide pain relief over a longer period of time, placing catheters near nerves has become a routine practice at the CHUM. Infraclavicular nerve block is one of the most widely used loco-regional anesthesia techniques for hand surgery. This block can be achieved either by paracoracoid (PC) or costoclavicular (CC) approach. Both approaches are currently used at the CHUM. The PC approach involves inserting a needle under the lower rim of the clavicle below the coracoid process. This approach makes it possible to reach the 3 different nerve bundles, located around the axillary artery, which are involved in the sensitivity of the hand. The CC approach, more recently described, proposes an insertion of the needle under the lower edge of the clavicle but in a lateral way to the axillary artery which makes it possible to reach the nerves at a place where the 3 main nerve bundles are still joined together. The clustering of nerve structures at the injection site may facilitate the spread of local anesthetics. Recent studies have demonstrated that the CC approach requires a smaller volume compared to the PC approach to achieve perineural blockade. The effective dose 90 (ED90) for the CC approach was 19 mL while it is 31 mL for the PC approach. This is explained by the greater proximity between the three nerve bundles targeted in the CC approach and a lower prevalence of anatomical variations at this level. However, studies on the subject are rare and do not allow conclusions to be drawn on the superiority of either approach.
The study will review data collected in 5 previously completed randomised controlled trials with a new primary outcome: to assess whether administration of the transmuscular quadratus lumborum block has an impact on the time an individual patient stays in the postanaesthesia care unit and how much opioid is consumed during this specified time.
The possible benefits expected from the use of the WALANT procedure are a decrease in intraoperative pain at the surgical site, a decrease in hospitalization time, and a decrease in the time required to lift the anesthesia postoperatively. The risks identified are those inherent to each type of anesthesia (WALANT or traditional ALR), as encountered in current practice, and are therefore not specific to the study: risks related to the local anesthetic agent or risks related to the puncture procedure. The main objective is to determine whether the patient's intraoperative pain at the surgical site is less after a WALANT procedure compared to a traditional ALR procedure (axillary or trunk).
Comparing the pain control outcomes for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with either: 1) adductor canal single shot injection plus placebo iPACK injection or 2) adductor canal single shot injection plus bupivacaine and dexamethasone iPACK injection. There are two surgical approaches for TKA 1) open 2) ROSA robotic assisted. Both follow the same pain management pathway. We plan to enroll patient undergoing either surgical procedure.