View clinical trials related to Anesthesia, Local.
Filter by:The goal of this study is to determine whether or not a suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment nerve block is effective at improving postoperative pain control in patients receiving an anterior approach hip replacement surgery. In general, postoperative pain control has a significant impact on earlier ambulation, initiation of physical therapy, better functional recovery, and overall patient satisfaction. The hypothesis is that providing patients with this nerve block will decrease opioid requirements in patients undergoing this surgery as compared to patients that do not receive the block.
The purpose of this study is to determine, among patients receiving elective anorectal surgery, does application of ice to the perianal area prior to the procedure, lead to use of decreased amounts of intravenous (IV) anesthesia? Anorectal surgeries for hemorrhoids, fistulas and fissures are done on an outpatient basis under monitored anesthesia care. This means patients get sedating medications through an IV but often do not require intubation. The difficulty with monitored anesthesia is balancing patient comfort against the risk of apnea (not breathing due to over sedation). Application of ice to the perianal area may help increase patient comfort, decrease the amounts of medications given for sedation and therefore decrease risk and increase recovery from the anesthesia.
Despite many recent advances in pain management, post-operative pain is widely considered to be poorly managed. Furthermore, the mainstay of current pain management is opioids, for which there is strong evidence of ill effects and long-term potential for addiction. There are many studies demonstrating that perineural regional anesthesia can be superior to intravenous opioid analgesia, and that the technique is safe. By using temporary implanted catheters, this method can now deliver prolonged analgesia, thus reducing the need for opioids in the postoperative period. Regional anesthesia is a proven technique and used daily by anesthesiologists, and it is also the first choice for hip and knee replacement surgery for orthopedic surgeons. Patients undergoing head and neck reconstruction with the use of free tissue transfer experience a significant amount of post-operative pain due to the complexity of the surgery, the presence of a head and neck surgical site as well as a secondary donor site, and existing co-morbidities, most commonly malignancy, that also cause significant pain. These patients often require opioids for pain control throughout the hospital stay, and are almost always discharged home with additional opioids. By utilizing regional anesthesia blocks at the donor sites, the investigators can potentially reduce post-operative pain while also reducing the use of opioids.
Participants that undergo permanent cardiac pacemaker implantation can often present with challenging anesthetic management plans for the anesthesia provider. Typically, these procedures are performed in electrophysiology labs that are often in remote locations away from the main operating room suite. This presents the logistic challenges of not having standard anesthesia machines, equipment and medications readily available for these cases.Currently, the majority of these cases are done under local anesthesia with light to moderate sedation. However, when it comes to inserting more complex devices such as implantable cardiac defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices, participants may not be able to tolerate these more invasive and painful procedures with only local anesthetic as the primary mode of analgesia. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthetic techniques, in particular the pectoralis nerve blocks (PEC I and II) and the Transversus Thoracic Muscle plane block (TTP), offer an alternative mode of analgesia for these participants. PEC I blocks target the lateral and medial pectoral nerves by injecting local anesthetic in the fascial plane between the pectoralis major and minor muscles. PEC II blocks supplement the PEC I block by targeting the intercostal nerves with local anesthetic injected between the pectoralis minor and serratus anterior muscles. The transversus thoracic plane block targets the anterior cutaneous branches of the intercostal nerves. In combination, these four blocks would provide analgesia of the upper anterior chest wall.(3)These would provide effective analgesia of the upper anterior chest wall.(7). However, there is a paucity of studies on the use of PEC blocks in cardiac pacemaker implantation procedures. There is a case report from 2014 on a 71 year-old male with an ejection fraction of 20% undergoing CRTD implantation, which showed that PECs block with moderate sedation using dexmedetomidine could be safely utilized to provide effective analgesia for the procedure.11 However, this was not a subcutaneous ICD that required tunneling of the coils. Thus there are no randomized controlled studies to investigate whether the use of peripheral nerve blocks as primary anesthetic choice could be a viable alternative for multiple participants undergoing subcutaneous ICD placement.
Backgroung:Regional anesthesia in breast surgery is of paramount importance to reduce pain in perioperative period. PECS II block is an interfascial block that has been used widely as regional anesthesia technique in breast surgery. ESP block is a novel interfascial block proposed in 2016 by Forero. Several reports used this technique in breast surgery to provide analgesia but to date no studies comparing these technique exists. Our hypotesis is that this two technique are equally able to provide analgesia in breast surgery. Study type: RCT, single blind.
Dental Fear and Anxiety (DFA) are at higher levels among children and often leads to avoidance of dental treatment. Negative experiences in the early years such as experience of pain during injections, fillings, or extractions may lead to difficulties in treatment and behavior management among children. During dental procedures such as restorations and extractions injectable anesthetics are required as they are used to anesthetize and numb the area around the tooth receiving treatment. Topical anesthetics are used prior to using injectable anesthetic to alleviate some pain and discomfort. Topical anesthetics should be used with caution as they consist of more concentrated doses of pharmaceutical elements used in injectable anesthetics. Such high concentrations can result in increased gag reflux, central nervous system depression and cardiovascular effects in rare cases. With many recent advances in dental treatment, there is also a need for new non-pharmaceutical strategies to alleviate pain and discomfort among children which in turn will motivate children and their parents to visit the dental clinic more frequently. Electronic anesthesia or Synapse Transcutaneous Electronic Nerve Stimulation (TENS), a non-invasive device that uses low energy electrical stimulation to reduce pain perception, has gained acceptance since the 1990s. Advantages of using the TENS device are that it is safe, easy to use, well-accepted among patients as evidenced in the few trials conducted so far, no adverse complications and has been successful in alleviating pain during dental procedures. This study aims to explore use of the TENS to alleviate pain and discomfort at the oral mucosal site where the patient will receive a local anesthetic injection. In this randomized case-crossover trial among children aged 6-14 years the effectiveness of Aleve TENS device in reducing pain and anxiety among children prior to receiving injectable local anesthetic agent during dental procedures is compared to those who receive the local anesthetic gel prior to receiving local anesthetic injection.
Making sure the heart rate and or the blood pressure [called hemodynamic instability] during surgery is stable, setting up for a rapid postoperative recovery, and ensuring that patients have adequate pain relief are some of the important goals of neurosurgical anesthesia. Scalp block anesthesia [injection of a numbing agent into the area of the scalp where the incision will be] together with general anesthesia is used to achieve these goals. There has been some research on whether or not scalp block improves patient recovery and pain management, but the studies have not be large enough to say for certain. This is true even though scalp block is used with almost every patient that is having brain surgery. The investigators propose to determine if scalp block in combination with asleep anesthesia is better than asleep anesthesia alone in patients who are having brain surgery for tumors in the cerebral area of the brain.
Aim The general aim of this study is to improve post-operative pain and reduce morphine consumption following laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR). We specifically aim to conduct a randomized, double blinded, controlled trial to investigate the effect of intra-peritoneal local anaesthesia infusions on post-operative morphine consumption and. Methods: Patients will be randomised by computer generated random numbers (random permutation) and opaque envelope methods. At closure, one small 2mm catheter belonging to the AutoFuser pain pump system will be placed in the peritoneal cavity between the onlay mesh and parietal peritoneum. In the treatment arm patients will receive 275mL of 0.2% ropivacaine at 4mL/h. In the placebo arm, 275mL of 0.9% normal saline will be used in a similar fashion. The infusions will run for 68 hours total. All members involved in patient care (with the exception of one independant research fellow) will be blinded to the above. After 68 hours the pump will be stopped and the catheter will be removed. Assessment of post-operative pain will be performed by visual analogue scale, and total opiate consumption will be collected and converted into morphine equivalents. Health significance: Local anaesthesia has become an important addition to multimodal regimens of analgesia following surgery. Recent studies have shown that local anaesthetic (LA) wound infiltration has improved post-operative pain when compared with standard opioid regimens for pain relief. Only one previous study looked at bupivacaine infusions into the hernia sac for three days following LVHR. This study found no improvement in post-operative pain or morphine consumption. We aim to demonstrate improved pain and reduced morphine consumption using an alternative catheter insertion technique and ropivacaine as the desired LA agent.