View clinical trials related to Anesthesia, Local.
Filter by:The purpose of the study is to compare the effect of illiohypogastric and ilioinguinal nerve block with the local infiltration with lidocaine in patients undergoing TAVI
INTRODUCTION: Currently, there is no scientific evidence about pain in the anesthetic blockage of the first finger according to the application method. However, clinical evidence has valued the use of carpule, due to the low pain it generates in the patient to the application of anesthetic. Most studies on anesthesia and pain, especially with the use of carpule and distracting methods, belong to the field of dentistry. OBJECTIVES: It is intended to determine the pain after an anesthetic block in H of Frost in the first finger with different application methods, such as syringe and carpule. As secondary objectives, it is intended to establish the difference in pain according to the sex and age of the patients. METHODOLOGY: Experimental, transverse and random clinical trial type analytical study, in which a sample of 200 individuals will be selected, 100 per group, which would require digital anesthesia of the first finger and that would fulfill the inclusion criteria. Result: after the completion of the study CONCLUSIONS: After the completion of the study
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two commonly used local/regional anesthesia techniques in adults patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: • the impact of both interventions on patient level of pain. • impact on postoperative analgesics administered Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two local/regional anesthesia techniques, either femoral nerve block (FNB) or suprainguinal fascia iliaca block (SiFi). Both techniques are the usual practice at the hospital, and we are NOT aiming to experiment on new anesthesia technique in this study.
The aim of this study is to compare between peribulbar block and subtenon block as an adjunct to general anesthesia in children undergoing strabismus surgery on oculocardiac reflex (OCR), post-operative analgesia and postoperative vomiting. Both techniques will be compared to intra-operative intravenous (IV) paracetamol combined with general anesthesia as a sole anesthetic technique.
This study aims to assess the efficacy of Transversus Abdominus Plane (TAP) blocks, a well-established anesthetic technique, to decrease the amount of post-operative pain in patients who undergo minimally invasive gynecologic surgeries. During minimally invasive gynecologic surgeries, the abdomen is inflated with pressurized air for visualization purposes and released at the end of the surgery. Traditionally, TAP blocks are performed by injecting long-acting local anesthetic agents under ultrasound guidance into the abdominal wall after abdominal surgery after the air has been emptied from the abdomen for additional anesthetic coverage post-operatively. This study proposes a novel approach: that performing TAP blocks while the abdomen is still insufflated will result in better post-operative pain outcomes as compared to the traditional method.
The aim of this study is to compare the traditional dorsal double injection digital block with the palmar single injection technique in the suturing of acute traumatic hand finger lacerations in terms of injection pain score (NRS), anesthesia onset time, and success of anesthesia. It is understood that single injection digital block and double injection digital block techniques do not have significant advantages over each other in terms of pain levels and procedure times. However, the need for rescue anesthesia was evaluated to be lower in the single injection digital block technique. This difference is especially due to measurements in the volar region incisions. According to the results of this study, we think that choosing the single injection digital block technique for volar region incisions is a more rational approach, especially in terms of the data of the need for rescue anesthesia.
Pain following open reduction of mandibular fractures is the most reported complaint during the first 24 post-operative hours. The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the impact of inferior alveolar nerve block with bupivacaine 0,5% in patients with mandibular fractures. The main question it aims to answer are: - Does the inferior alveolar nerve block with bupivacaine reduce the intensity of pain after mandibular fracture surgery? - Does the inferior alveolar nerve block with bupivacaine decrease the consumption of analgesics during the first 24 postoperative hours? Participants with bifocal mandibular fractures will be enrolled in the study (a fracture should be located on the dentate portion of the right hemi-mandible, and a second fracture located on the dentate portion of the left hemi-mandible). Each patient will receive either a right or left inferior alveolar nerve block. The patient: - Will be asked to estimate the pain score by the numerical rating scale during the first 24 postoperative hours for each fracture. - They will be given rescue analgesia in case of intense pain. The number of uses of rescue analgesia will be noted. Researchers will compare a group of fracture that will receive the inferior alveolar nerve block with bupivacaine with a group of fracture that will not receive the inferior alveolar nerve block, to see if regional anesthesia improve postoperative pain management of mandibular fractures.
fear of the discomfort that comes with anesthetic needle insertion. For dental local anesthesia, needles with a scalpel-designed bevel have been claimed to decrease pain elicited by injection. Objective of the study: The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of needle bevel on patient's perception of pain during inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia and the needle tip will be further assessed for deformation. Materials and Methods: The study will be a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial, with a parallel design. A total of sixty-six healthy children will be selected from The Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health Clinic, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt. Children will be selected with scores 3 or 4 Frankel behavioral rating scale. Written consent will be obtained from the legal guardian. Participants will be randomly allocated into two groups according to the type of needle bevel that will be used. Group I (test group) will receive inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) using a double scalpel blade bevel needle, while group II (control group) will receive IANB using a standard blade bevel needle. All the procedures will be videotaped. Pain reaction will be evaluated subjectively using a face scale modified from the Maunuksela scale and objectively using the Sensory, Eye, and Motor (SEM) scale. After the respective single injection, the needles will be fixed on an object slide and prepared for microscopic examination.
Surgical fixation for acute clavicular fractures is increasingly preferred among orthopedic surgeons to improve healing and decrease the risk of malunion. Regional anesthesia for clavicular fractures allows rapid recovery, prolonged postoperative analgesia, and less opioid consumption, and so decreases the hospital stay. There is no consensus regarding the best regional anesthetic technique for surgical fixation for acute clavicular fractures. Selective supraclavicular nerve block combined with either superior trunk or clavipectoral fascial plane block is a promising regional anesthetic technique for midshaft clavicular surgeries.
Rationale: Effective and fast topical anesthesia of the nasal mucosa is of paramount importance for nasal instrumentation like nasal fiberoptic procedures, awake nasal fiberoptic intubation and placement of nasogastric tubes. Conventional topical anesthesia for the nasal mucosa is often patchy and not always effective. The investigators hypothesize that topical anesthesia of the nasal mucosa with the nasal atomizer adapter (NAA) provides good to excellent nasal topical anesthesia with high patient comfort. Objective: In this study the NAA will be used for nasal topical anesthesia. The investigators will evaluate complete anesthesia of the nasal mucosa for nasal instrumentation, the use of the NAA and the comfort level for the subjects. Study design: Interventional study. Study population: 20 healthy human volunteers, ASA 1, 18-60 years old. Intervention: Lidocaine 2% will be applied intranasally with the NAA before nasal instrumentation. On completion of the procedure the participant and the researcher will be asked to complete a feedback form. Main study parameters/endpoints: Studying the level of anesthesia of the nasal mucosa as evaluated and demonstrated with successful awake nasal instrumentation with minimal discomfort for the subject. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation: Risk management on the nasal atomizer adapter (NAA) shows that all user risks are mitigated and no residual risks remain for the use of the device. Testing of the device and the application of the device in daily practice has no additional risks than the present technique of performing topical anaesthesia of the nasal mucosa.