View clinical trials related to Prostate Cancer.
Filter by:The investigators aim to evaluate cancer control, genitourinary, rectal and overall health-related quality of life outcomes and effectiveness of focal therapy for localised prostate cancer using High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU).
Approximately 50%-95% of prostate cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy (RT) develop symptomatic urinary problems .These symptoms can significantly diminish a patient's quality of life during and shortly after therapy. Alpha1-blockers, such as Rapaflo, act to decrease resistance to urinary flow. This multi-institutional phase III trial is designed to compare standard of care versus preventive treatment with Rapaflo for prostate cancer patients, regardless of risk group, whose treatment consists of radical radiation therapy. We plan to recruit 188 patients across Quebec who will be randomized into two arms: rapaflo prescribed at start of radiation therapy or if/when symptoms appear.
Research repository designed to establish prostate cancer upgrading reference set and development of a risk prediction tool. Repository will include clinical information and biologics on a cohort of 240 men, to predict presence of high grade cancer at time of prostatectomy (removal of prostate) among patients with a low grade cancer diagnosis at time of biopsy.
Identifying clinical factors such as medication, background diseases and blood tests that effect the course of disease in cancer patients can help physicians to better decide on the patient's treatment plan. The study seeks to identify and analyze relevant clinical factors that effect the course of the disease and the results of treatment in patients with cancers of the prostate, bladder and kidney.
Giving a higher dose of radiation to the dominant tumour nodule within the prostate is hypothesized to improve tumour control. This trial will assess whether this technique, delivered in 5 treatments, can be delivered without increasing side effects.
The cone beam image is a part of the radiotherapy treatment machine and uses lower energy xrays as the head of the radiotherapy machine moves around the patient in a circle. This takes pictures that give 3-dimensional information, somewhat like a CT scan. These images are better at showing the position of the tumour and surrounding soft tissues than the standard xrays that were previously used. Cone Beam Imaging Technology is not new and has been used regularly at The Christie for many years. The standard cone beam scan is taken before the actual radiotherapy treatment or after the treatment has been delivered. Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT or Arc Radiotherapy) is a novel method of delivering radiotherapy that involves the continuous movement of the radiotherapy treatment machine head around the patient and MLC during radiation. Arc radiotherapy has been clinically implemented at The Christie for prostate radiotherapy treatments and work is in progress for implementation in lung radiotherapy. The continuous gantry rotation inherent to VMAT delivery makes this simultaneous imaging possible, although there are concerns associated with the impact that this may have on patient dose and image quality. The aim of this research is to assess whether the image quality of cone beam scans taken during treatment are as good as standard cone beam scans taken before or after treatment used to determine the accuracy of patient position and the tumour coverage by radiotherapy.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the number of circulating tumor cells (CTC) before and after treatment using an experimental method for detecting CTC, compared to commercial CTC assay results, in patients with prostate, breast or colorectal cancers. Experiments will be done to develop a new assay technique and also test how CTC react to commonly used drugs. This information will be analyzed to determine if the experimental assays can be helpful in the future to predict how a patient's cancer may react to certain treatments. The research experiments will also attempt to grow CTC for long-term or "immortal" cell lines that can be further studied for proteins and gene mutations related to the specific tumor (not familial), and testing for sensitivity to drugs. Blood samples will be collected at specific time points during routine medical care from patients with prostate, breast, colorectal or other solid tumor cancer. Samples will also be collected from patients with no cancer for comparison purposes. Samples for the experimental tests will be identified only by codes and results will not be shared with participants. Patients with prostate, breast or colorectal cancer will also have blood samples drawn for commercial CTC assays as part of their standard care.
The purpose of this study is to determine the side effects and how effective CyberKnife stereotactic ablative body radiation (SABR) is in patients with prostate cancer. The CyberKnife system is a new type of radiation machine that uses a special system to precisely focus large doses of x-rays on the tumor. The device is designed to concentrate large doses of radiation onto the tumor so that injury from radiation to the nearby normal tissue will be minimal. The purpose of this evaluation is to see if this treatment will help patients with low to intermediate risk prostate cancer and to evaluate the effect of this treatment on the patients' quality of life over time.
This is a prospective study to determine if the adjuvant use of Curcumin improves recurrence-free survival.
This is an open-label, randomized, parallel group two-stage phase 1-2 study with an escalation and an expansion component. This study will evaluate an extended-release (ER) formulation of onapristone in patients with prostate cancer in which Progesterone Receptor (PR) may be contributing to tumor progression. A companion diagnostic to select patients whose prostate cancer expresses the activated form of the PR (APR) is under development and will be implemented in this study; it may be used to further enrich the selection of the population based upon ongoing review of the results. Patients will be treated until occurrence of an intolerable safety issue, treatment failure, if patient elects to withdraw, or for non-compliance with either protocol-specified evaluations or onapristone treatment. An additional cohort of patients will be included at the recommended phase 2 dose to gain additional understanding of the onapristone safety profile and potential anti-cancer activity.