View clinical trials related to Prostate Cancer.
Filter by:The aim of the study is the evaluation of the possible role of PSMA PET-CT in early detection of prostate cancer, reducing rate of unnecessary prostate biopsies, and in cases of prostate cancer, correct staging of the disease and corresponding management.
The investigators provided a multicenter analysis aiming to investigate, in a clinical practice setting, the prognostic relevance of previous primary radical prostatectomy (RP) or external beam radiotherapy (RT) in terms of Overall Survival as opposed to patients with no primary treatment performed, in a cohort of patients enrolled in 223-Ra treatment for mCRPC. 223-Ra has been administered from investigators according to the current label authorization and all patients underwent 223-Ra treatment, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Tranperineal prostate biopsy(TPB) and Transrectal prostate biopsy(TRUSB) are now both routine diagnosis methods of prostate cancer in Queen Mary Hospital. The TRUSB has been the most common way to sample prostate tissue for decades. The TPB has been employed as one of our routine diagnosis methods in early 2018. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether Tranperineal prostate biopsy using a noval transperineal access system under local anaesthesia is non-inferior to standard 12-cores Transrectal prostate biopsy in detecting prostate cancer (PCa), in patients with clinical suspicion of PCa with no prior prostate biopsy.
Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in humans, but low mortality, around 10 / 100,000 patients / year. It differs from other cancers by its high rate of cure, as well as a long term survival. Numerous treatment techniques are available and of comparable effectiveness: as a result it must be given importance to the short and long term side effects of these different treatments. Prostate brachytherapy with permanent implants is thus one of the standard techniques for the treatment of localized prostate cancers of favorable grades (WHO grade 1-2). In comparison with prostatectomy and RTE, brachytherapy allows low rates of long-term urinary toxicities, and comparable rates of erectile function preservation. With regard to erectile dysfunction, their pathophysiology after irradiation is complex and poorly understood, including damage to the erector apparatus, innervation, vascularization, and of course the level of libido. As an example, the radiotherapy team of the Lyon Sud hospital showed that the delivering a the lowest dose of radiation to the pudendal arteries and to the penile bulb during RTE, leads to erectile preservation rates comparable with those from the literature with nearly 85% of patients with erectile function retained at 2 years . They were also able to retrospectively show that a lower dose to the pudendal arteries correlated with better erectile function during brachytherapy. The brachytherapy procedure requires general anesthesia and endorectal ultrasound, which are optimal conditions for injecting hyaluronic acid between the prostate, rectum, and pudendal arteries. This gesture has shown to induce very few morbidity. They want to demonstrate that the injection of hyaluronic acid during prostate brachytherapy will reduce the radiation dose to the pudendal arteries and penile bulb, and thus improve the rate of preservation of erectile function in selected patients. This randomized phase III study comparing dyserection rates after CT performed with (Arm A) and without (Arm B) injection of HA, in a patient population without erectile dysfunction before treatment.
Development of a prospective clinico-biological database allowing the provision of clinical data and corresponding biological materials to the medical and scientific community.
A multi-site study to evaluate the potential use of the ChEC test of seminal fluid as an additional triage test in stratifying patients for further tests.
To determine if fBT+sRT is superior to standard care in terms of urinary toxicity by having fewer patients experience a minimal important decline (MID) in urinary irritation/obstructive QoL
As the most common male carcinoma, prostate cancer is a major tumor entity in oncology. In addition to definitive radiotherapy, surgical procedure is considered to be an oncologically equivalent therapeutic alternative for non-metastatic malignancies in the primary setting. However, a subsequent radiotherapy of the prostate bed is often necessary, which takes place as an "adjuvant" treatment immediately after surgery or in the course of a repeated increase in PSA and usually extends over several weeks. For the primary situation (without previous surgery), several randomized phase III clinical trials have shown that it is possible to shorten radiotherapy by increasing the single dose (called hypofractionation). In the context of two prospective Phase II studies, which were carried out in Heidelberg, it has since been shown that hypofractionation with both photons and protons is safe and feasible even in the postoperative situation. The current, prospective and randomized PAROS study is now intended to demonstrate a multicentric phase III study as an improvement in the quality of life caused by rectum toxicity (primary endpoint) by the use of protons. The oncological non-inferiority of hypofractionated radiotherapy after surgery is a secondary endpoint.
This study evaluates the difference between 2 prostate biopsy methods, transrectal (through the rectal wall) and transperineal (through the skin) needle biopsy. Men who are in need of prostate biopsy due to clinical suspicions of prostate cancer will be randomly assigned (1:1) to either transrectal or transperineal approach. This research study will scientifically determine if one biopsy method is better than the other in reducing complications and improving cancer detection.
Personalisation of radiotherapy dose based on real-time assessments of normal tissue and tumour response would maximise cure and minimise treatment related toxicity. During a 5 fraction course of prostate Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) this pilot study will assess whether a number of different biomarker approaches can predict for normal tissue and tumour response. Firstly the investigators will analyse volatile organic compounds released within the breath with each fraction of treatment. Secondly the investigators will analyse cell free normal tissue and tumour DNA released during treatment. Thirdly the investigators will develop imaging processing algorithms to look for imaging biomarkers predicting rectal wall toxicity using pre and post treatment cone beam CT verification images. Each of these approaches will be assessed against prostate specific antigen (PSA), Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0) criteria and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) patient reported outcomes with a maximum of 24 months of follow up.