Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

The FAVOR V AMI study is a prospective, multicenter, blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial comparing the long-term clinical outcomes of the "Functional and Angiography-derived Strain inTegration (FAST)" technique (next-generation quantitative flow ratio [μQFR] and radial wall strain [RWS]) guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategy, with standard treatment strategy, in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary disease (MVD).


Clinical Trial Description

The FAVOR V AMI study is a prospective, multicenter, blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial comparing the long-term clinical outcome of the two PCI strategies, the FAST guided strategy (test group) versus standard treatment strategy (control group), in a high-risk population with STEMI and MVD who underwent successful primary PCI of the infarct-related artery. The primary endpoint is major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), or ischemia-driven revascularization when the last patient reaches 6-month follow-up. The major secondary endpoint is cardiovascular death and MI when at least 395 total events have accrued. The study hypothesis is the FAST (μQFR+RWS) guided PCI strategy is superior to a standard treatment strategy by the primary and major secondary endpoint. For the patients randomized to μQFR+RWS group, μQFR will be measured in all non-infarct related arteries containing any non-culprit lesion with visually-assessed percentage diameter stenosis (DS%) ≥50% and ≤90% with reference vessel diameter (RVD) ≥2.5 mm. If μQFR ≤0.80 or RWS ≥13%, PCI will be performed; if μQFR >0.80 and RWS <13%, the procedure will deferral; if DS% >90%, PCI should be performed without the need of μQFR or RWS. For all patients undergoing PCI, post-PCI μQFR measurement is recommended; if μQFR <0.90, if the reason is obvious post-dilation with a non-compliant balloon or bail-out stenting should be considered; if the reason is not obvious intravascular imaging should be considered. For the patients randomized to standard treatment group, PCI should be performed of all non-culprit lesions with visual DS% ≥70% in all non-infarct related arteries with RVD ≥2.5 mm; for a non-culprit lesion with visually DS% 50-70%, PCI can be performed if fractional flow reserve (FFR) ≤0.80 or instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) ≤0.89. All patients will be followed by either telephone or clinic visit at 1 month, 6 months,1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years and 5 years. The sample size will be about 5,000 using an event-driven sample calculation. An adaptive design will be implemented for sample size re-estimation when 90% of patients have been enrolled. All principal analyses will take place in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. The primary and major secondary endpoints will be analyzed in prespecified subgroups, including age (≥65 vs. <65), sex (men vs. women), diabetes (yes vs. no), time from symptom onset to primary PCI (≤ vs. > median), planned number of NCLs for PCI in the control arm (0/1 vs. 2 vs. 3), infarct related artery (LM/LAD vs, others), untreated CTOs with RVD ≥2.5 mm in non-infarct related artery (yes vs. no), timing of elective PCI (same hospitalization as the emergency PCI vs. during an elective readmission), P2Y12 inhibitor therapy (Clopidogrel vs. Ticagrelor), treatment of any non-infarct lesion with DS >90% prior to randomization (yes vs. no), LVEF (echo post primary PCI, prior to randomization) (>40% vs. ≤40%), Killip Class (I vs. ≥II), lesion location of non-culprit lesion (LM/LAD vs. others), diseased vessels (two-vessel disease vs. LM/three-vessel disease), moderate or severe calcification in any NCL (yes vs. no), bifurcation lesion with planned main vessel and SB treatment in any NCL (yes vs. no), intravascular guidance during the randomized procedure (yes vs. no), μQFR grayzone (μQFR < 0.75 vs. = 0.75-0.85 vs. > 0.85 [by core laboratory]), μQFR-based functional SYNTAX score (FSSQFR, low tertile vs. mid tertile vs. high tertile [by core laboratory]), post-PCI μQFR (≥0.90 vs. <0.90 [by core laboratory]), angiography-derived IMR (≥2.5 mmHgs/cm vs. <2.5 mmHgs/cm [by core laboratory]), residual physiology pattern (PPG diffuse vs. local [by core laboratory]), μQFR-based residual functional SYNTAX score (rFSSQFR, 0 vs. ≥ 1 [by core laboratory]), learning experience of μQFR/RWS (first half vs. second half of enrolled cases in each center). ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT05669222
Study type Interventional
Source China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases
Contact Bo Xu, MBBS
Phone +86-10-88322562
Email bxu@citmd.com
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase N/A
Start date September 30, 2023
Completion date June 2028

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Terminated NCT03959072 - Cardiac Cath Lab Staff Radiation Exposure
Recruiting NCT04566497 - Assessment of Adverse Outcome in Asymptomatic Patients With Prior Coronary Revascularization Who Have a Systematic Stress Testing Strategy Or a Non-testing Strategy During Long-term Follow-up. N/A
Recruiting NCT05240781 - Zotarolimus vs Sirolimus Eluting Stent in High Bleeding Risk N/A
Recruiting NCT03378934 - Anti-platelet Effect of Berberine in Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT06025071 - Residual Inflammatory Risk-Guided colcHicine in Elderly Trial Phase 4
Withdrawn NCT04043091 - Coronary Angiography in Critically Ill Patients With Type II Myocardial Infarction N/A
Completed NCT03085823 - The All-comers Sirolimus-coated Balloon European Registry
Completed NCT02837744 - Studying Hemostatic Effect of Axiostat® Dressing on Radial Access After Percutaneous Procedure
Completed NCT02044146 - A Pharmacodynamic Study of a Personalized Strategy for P2Y12 Inhibition Versus Ticagrelor in Reducing Ischemic and Bleeding Risk Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT03131271 - Effect of Ice Bag Application to Femoral Region on Pain in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention N/A
Completed NCT01156571 - A Clinical Trial Comparing Cangrelor to Clopidogrel Standard Therapy in Subjects Who Require Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) (CHAMPION PHOENIX) Phase 3
Completed NCT01135667 - Prasugrel Versus Double Dose Clopidogrel to Treat Clopidogrel Low-responsiveness After PCI Phase 4
Unknown status NCT00751491 - Clopidogrel Versus Adenosin in Non Urgent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Phase 3
Completed NCT00725868 - Blood Endothelium Biomarkers to Predict Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention N/A
Completed NCT03708588 - Chewed Versus Integral Pill of Ticagrelor Phase 4
Completed NCT04163393 - R-One Efficiency For PCI Evolution With Robotic Assistance N/A
Recruiting NCT05554588 - Intrathrombus Thrombolysis Versus Aspiration Thrombectomy During Primary PCI N/A
Recruiting NCT06080919 - Plaque Modification And Impact On Microcirculatory Territory After Drug-Coated Balloon Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PLAMI). N/A
Recruiting NCT05353140 - LAAO Versus NOAC in Patients With AF and PCI N/A
Recruiting NCT06075433 - Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of 1-year of DAPT After Genoss DES Sirolimus-eluting Stent Implantation in Patients