View clinical trials related to Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice.
Filter by:Chronic pain affects from one third to one half of the population in the UK (Fayaz et al, 2016). The cost and burden of chronic pain is significant to health services worldwide. The affects of chronic pain are widespread upon the lives of those affected. Health professionals need to be better equipped than at present to manage pain and current chronic pain management knowledge in healthcare is poor. Briggs et al 2011 described the hours of pain education delivered at undergraduate level as 'woefully inadequate'. The International Association for Study of Pain (IASP) defined curricula for pain education at undergraduate level 6 years ago but current levels of knowledge at undergraduate health professional level are not widely known. This study aims to establish this at the outset of a pre-registration health professional courses and at the end of these courses. This study aims to identify the baseline knowledge and attitudes of pre-registration healthcare students in Universities throughout UK and Ireland toward chronic pain management. The disciplines targeted are nursing, midwifery, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, diagnostic radiography and paramedics. It is a cross sectional study that compares attitudes and knowledge of first year and final year pre-registration healthcare students in the UK and Ireland. These parameters are measured using the HC-PAIRS measure and Revised Neurophysiology Questionnaire respectively. In addition anonymous data is collected pertaining to participant characteristics which are institute of study, age, gender, level and discipline of study to enable a comparison between these parameters.
Oral Health care has been shown to have low priority among nursing personnel, especially among personnel with shorter education.
This study tests two posters that teach people about contraception: one designed by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), and one designed by the researchers. The investigators hypothesize that the new poster will have more increased (1) contraceptive knowledge, (2) willingness to use effective contraception, and (3) perceived pregnancy risk than the CDC poster. This study will expand useful knowledge because contraceptive knowledge, willingness to use effective contraception, and perceived pregnancy risk have been shown to affect women's likelihood of using contraception. If the investigators learn how to increase these factors, the investigators could theoretically reduce women's risk of unplanned pregnancy. The investigators will test this hypothesis by recruiting N=1000 women to complete an online survey using Amazon Mechanical Turk. These women will complete a survey that will first measure their initial contraceptive knowledge, willingness to use effective contraception, and perceived pregnancy risk. Then women will randomly be shown one of the two posters. Then, the investigators will measure their contraceptive knowledge, willingness to use effective contraception, and perceived pregnancy risk again. The investigators will use statistical tests (a t-test) to find out whether there are significant changes in these three outcomes for either of the posters, and whether one poster does a better job of changing these outcomes than the other.
Millions of children and adolescents are prescribed opioid pain relievers each year, placing them at risk for serious adverse events and misuse in the home setting. Parents who manage these medicines, therefore, need to recognize opioid-related risks and make decisions that will both reduce these risks yet ensure effective pain relief for their children. The proposed research will evaluate new strategies to help parents learn about opioid risks, make safe and effective analgesic decisions, and develop and demonstrate safe drug management behaviors. 840 parents and their children who are undergoing an elective surgical procedure will be recruited. Parents will be randomized to receive the new educational and practical behavioral strategy or routine information. Parents' knowledge and perceptions will be evaluated at baseline and at critical times after surgery. Parents' opioid handling and administration will also be assessed.
The aim of the trial is to test the effect of a web-based decision aid (DA) on colorectal cancer (CRC) knowledge, decisional conflict, participation rate, and informed choice (evaluated based on knowledge, attitudes and actual participation). The study includes three study arms. Citizens to be recruited are identified from the Danish Civil Registration System based on residence (Central Denmark Region), age (50-74 years old), and month of birth. A random sample of 15,000 citizens born in December (invited for CRC screening through October/November/December 2017) (study arm 1+2) and 5,000 citizens born in October (invited for CRC screening in January/February 2017) (study arm 3) is identified. Citizens in study arm 1+2 will receive a baseline questionnaire assessing knowledge, attitudes, worry, and health literacy. Non respondents will receive one reminder after two weeks and after four weeks non-respondents will receive a phone call, offering them to fill out the questionnaire via the phone. Baseline questionnaire respondents are included in the study, and will be randomized into two study arms (intervention group and control group). Citizens in the intervention group will be identified in the screening IT system. Date of screening invitation and screening reminder (citizens who do not return a stool sample within 45 days of the screening invitation) is retrieved. Citizens receiving a screening reminder will receive a link for the DA. Follow-up questionnaire will be sent to all included citizens in study-arm 1+2 three months after the last screening invitation has been sent out. Citizens have six weeks to respond to the questionnaire. Study arm 3 is a historic cohort. The citizens receive only one questionnaire at the same time as the baseline questionnaires are sent out to the intervention and control groups. The citizens are included if they respond to the questionnaire within six weeks. Questionnaire reminders are sent out at two and four weeks. Data on screening invitation date, screening reminder date, returning a stool sample and result will be retrieved from the screening IT system for all included citizens (Study arm 1-3). Lastly, data from Statistics Denmark (on socio-demographic and socio-economic factors) will be included.
A Descriptive study to assess the knowledge, attitude and practice regarding eugenics among eligible couples of selected area of Ambala, Haryana, India. Eligible couples were the married couples where wife is in the age group of 15-45 years planning for conception, have conceived and may or may not have any living child.Eugenics are to methods that are adopted by eligible couples for having physically and psychologically healthy conception and pregnancy.
The objective of this study to evaluate potential impact of a brief, low-cost primary care-based intervention of parenting self-efficacy, knowledge, and behavior.
In 2010, the French population over 75 years of age was 9%; It will be 13% in 2030 and 19% in 2050 according to estimates. The incidence of falls is high in the elderly population, with at least one fall per year for one-third of the over-65s and for half of the over-80s. These data are consistent with the international medical literature, particularly in Japan, the United States and France, with a high rate of recurrence from the first fall. Falling is a complex phenomenon that is of great importance in terms of morbidity and mortality since it can be followed by serious complications: failure to recover, recurrences, trauma (fractures, hematomas, wounds), complications of decubitus and ulcers, Immobilization, loss of autonomy, hospitalization, institutionalization, psychological complications (post-fall syndrome, depressive syndrome), death. Fall risk factors are well known and described and relayed by learned societies of geriatrics and medical literature. In addition, HAS reported on this issue in 2009. The French Society of Geriatrics and Gerontology (SFGG) defines fragility as a clinical syndrome that reflects a decrease in reserve physiological capacities that alters the coping mechanisms of stress. Its clinical expression is modulated by comorbidities and psychological, social, economic and behavioral factors. Frailty syndrome is a risk marker for mortality and pejorative events, including disability, falls, hospitalization and institutionalization. The fall and its complications are closely related to the fragility syndrome. The very fragile patient must take an active part in his own care. He is the first advocate of fall prevention. On the other hand medical desertification and the low number of geriatricians makes this implication problematic even more so if the person is isolated or has cognitive impairment. Nevertheless, it is important to make the patient actor of his own prevention. This is the first study to describe the knowledge of older adults about their own risk of falling.
This is a prospective randomized control trial to compare the impact of two different types of pre-operative web-based breast cancer information on the quality of patient decision making. Patients are emailed web-based information prior to the surgical consultation. Outcomes are assess at multiple time points: 1) prior to the surgical consultation, 2) immediately following the consultation.
Background: Physicians´ lack of knowledge contributes to underuse of insulin and poor glycemic control in adults with diabetes mellitus (DM). Traditional continuing medical education have limited efficacy, so new approaches are required. Objective: We report the design of a trial to assess the educational efficacy of InsuOnline©, a game for education of primary care physicians (PCPs) on initiation and adjustment of insulin for the treatment of DM, which was designed to be: a) educationally adequate; and b) self-motivating and attractive. Methods: A multidisciplinary team, with endocrinologists, experts in medical education, and programmers, was assembled for design and development of InsuOnline©, a serious game which includes game elements and a well-defined, evidence-based curriculum of topics on insulin therapy. The first step of our study will be usability and playability tests, with PCPs and medical students, playing the game on a desktop. After that and further adjusts, we will perform an unblinded randomized controlled trial, with PCPs who work in the city of Londrina, to assess the educational validity of the game. A group of 64 PCPs will play InsuOnline© on the web, and the control group, of 64 PCPs, will underwent traditional teaching activities (lecture and group discussion). Knowledge on how to initiate and adjust insulin will be assessed by a web-based multiple-choice questionnaire, and attitudes regarding diabetes/insulin will be assessed by Diabetes Attitude Scale 3, at 3 time points: before, immediately after, and 6 months after the intervention. Subjects´ general impressions on the interventions will also be assessed by free-text questions. Software logs will be reviewed.