There are about 3491 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Singapore. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
With existing evidence showing the difference in miRNA expression levels between non-cancer and cancer groups, the investigators assume that levels of DNA methylation, RNA expression as well as protein concentration will also be dysregulated during disease progression. Combining the power of multi-omic cancer biomarkers, the investigators hypothesize that the sensitivity and specificity of MiRXES MCST can be significantly improved compared to existing multi-cancer diagnostic tests. In this study, the investigators propose to develop and validate blood-based, multi-cancer screening tests through a multi-omics approach.
This study is intended to confirm the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, and the durability of hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) suppression observed with bepirovirsen for 24 weeks (with loading doses) as compared to the placebo arm. This study will have 4 stages: a) Double-blind treatment (bepirovirsen or placebo) for 24 weeks. b) Nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) treatment for 24 weeks. c) NA cessation stage OR Continue NA for 24 weeks. d) Durability of response and follow up for further 24 weeks for participants who stopped NA treatment at Week 48. The arms will be stratified based on HBsAg level (HBsAg greater than or equal to [≥] 100 international unit per milliliter [IU/mL] to less than or equal [≤]1000 IU/mL or greater than [>] 1000 IU/mL to ≤3000 IU/mL) at screening. The total duration of the study, including screening (up to 60 days), the double-blind treatment stage (24 weeks), the On NA only stage (24 weeks), and the NA cessation and durability stages (48 weeks) is up to approximately 104 weeks at maximum for each participant.
The goal of this observational patient registry is to learn how expert centers treat patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). CTEPH is a condition in which blood clots block the blood vessels in the lungs. There are currently three treatment options for patients with CTEPH: - surgery to remove blood clots from large vessels in the lungs (pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA)) - the use of a small balloon to unblock smaller blood vessels (balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA)) - drugs Patients can also receive a combination of these treatments. The main question this registry aims to answer are: - How many patients receive a given kind of treatment? - How do expert centers combine the different treatments? - Are patients doing better after they receive a given kind of treatment? - How many patients are alive 1, 3 and 5 years after they receive a given kind of treatment? Participants will receive the same treatments that they would receive if they did not participate in the study. During the study, patients will visit their doctors as they would do normally. The doctors will collect information on the patients' health and enter it into the study database. The follow-up time will be at least 3 years for all patients.
The main purpose of this study is to pioneer an easy risk stratification tools, which is developed using novel artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, that will be able to detect common and fatal heart diseases easily simply through a picture of the back of the eye, the retina. The retinal images will be analysed using a computer application with the risk stratification tool to predict health outcome of individual. The study also aims to correlate between clinical characteristics, lifestyle (eg. exercise, sleep, erectile dysfunction) and diet to retinal and coronary vasculature and clinical outcomes.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nemtabrutinib compared to investigator's choice of fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide plus rituximab (FCR) or bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) in participants with previously untreated CLL/SLL without 17p deletion and/or tumor protein (TP) 53 mutation. The primary hypothesis is that nemtabrutinib is superior to FCR/BR with respect to progression-free survival (PFS).
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of deucravacitinib compared with placebo in an active moderate to severe Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) population.
The study will be conducted in two parts (part A and part B). The main purpose of this study is to compare the amount of LY3209590 that gets into the blood stream and how long it takes the body to get rid of it, when self-administered at different body sites, abdominal wall, upper arm and thigh (part A), when administered by two different routes of injection, subcutaneously or intravenously (part B) in healthy participants. The study may last up to 65 (part A) and 184 (part B) days, respectively.
The overarching aim of the project is to assess whether structure learning is an effective tool to train and improve cognitive flexibility and whether this is transferable to learning and other cognitive skills. The investigators will employ a multi-modal approach that combine both cognitive-behavioural and neuroimaging measures to examine how functional brain activations and/or cognitive performances are affected when participants go through a structure learning training paradigm relative to a working memory training paradigm (active control) or a no-training paradigm (passive control).
The main purpose of this study is to determine the tolerability and side effects related to LY3875383 given as a single injection under the skin to healthy participants and participants with elevated triglyceride (TG) levels.The study will also assess how fast LY3875383 gets into the blood stream and how long the body takes to get rid of it. Each enrolled participant will receive a single dose of either LY3875383 or placebo.The study will be conducted in four parts (A, B, C and D) and may last up to approximately 28 to 56 weeks including screening.
This study is a randomized double-blinded trial investigating the effect of Transcranial Direct Current stimulation (tDCS) on upper limb motor function rehabilitation in chronic stroke patients. 51 subjects will be recruited from National University Hospital (NUH) and be randomized to receive one of the followings: - Group 1 will receive 1 mA anodal tDCS stimulation to the ipsilesional M1 of cortical representation of the affected upper limb; - Group 2 to receive 1mA anodal tDCS to the contralesional premotor cortex; - Group 3 to receive sham tDCS stimulation with anode placed over the scalp area corresponding to ipsilesional M1. tDCS will be performed once a day together with standardized occupational therapy (GRASP) for 20 sessions within 30 days. Group 1 and Group 2 will receive tDCS for 20 minutes during each session, while Group 3 only receives the current stimulation for 20 seconds. GRASP will be performed daily together with tDCS, either concurrently with or immediately after tDCS stimulation. The outcome measures will be measured at baseline, after intervention and 1 month after intervention, including: 1. TMS measurement of corticospinal excitability; 2. functional MRI scan; 3. High density EEG (HD-EEG) evaluation; 4. Clinical measures on upper limb motor function; 5. Cognitive tests.