There are about 13332 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Netherlands. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The objective of the REACT trial is to investigate the effect of roflumilast 500 μg tablets once daily versus placebo on exacerbation rate and pulmonary function in COPD patients who are concomitantly treated with a fixed combination of long-acting β2-agonists (LABA) and inhaled glucocorticosteroids (ICS). In addition, data on safety and tolerability of roflumilast will be obtained. An additional objective is to further characterize the population pharmacokinetic profile of roflumilast and roflumilast N oxide and to further characterize their pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) relationship in terms of efficacy and relevant safety aspects. Patients to be included are required to have severe COPD associated with chronic bronchitis and a history of frequent exacerbations and must be concomitantly treated with a fixed combination of LABA and ICS. Two parallel treatment arms (roflumilast 500 μg once daily and placebo) are included.
This double-blind, placebo-controlled study will evaluate the benefit of first-line maintenance erlotinib (Tarceva) versus erlotinib at the time of disease progression in participants with advanced NSCLC who have not progressed following 4 cycles of platinum based-chemotherapy and whose tumor does not harbor an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-activating mutation. Participants will be randomized to receive either erlotinib 150 milligrams (mg) orally (PO) once daily or placebo. Participants who progress on placebo will receive erlotinib 150 mg PO once daily as second-line therapy, and those who progress on erlotinib may switch to a non-investigational, second-line chemotherapy. Treatments will continue until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity. Participants may also be entered into a final Survival Follow-Up (SFU) period upon treatment discontinuation.
This is a multicenter single arm open label study. The primary objective is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Lung Volume Reduction Coil (LVRC) for the treatment of patients with emphysema in multiple centers.
While the Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) clinical program has studied the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of SPD489 in treating core symptoms of ADHD in children and adolescents aged 6-17 years and adults aged 18-55 years, the majority of these studies have been of short duration - up to 8 weeks. A number of long-term studies have been undertaken (up to 1 year) and these have confirmed the safety and ongoing efficacy in this patient population. In order to run a study with investigational medication within Poland the study changed to a Phase 3 rather than a Phase 4 study in that country. Please note that the study number remains as SPD489-404. Study SPD489-404 has been designed to further evaluate the long-term effects of SPD489 in children and adolescents over a 2-year treatment period.
Rationale: The mortality of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients on dialysis remains high. This may at least be partly due to the insufficient removal of (especially protein-bound) uremic toxins which have been associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. It is unknown whether the combination of long-hour haemodialysis (HD) with convection increases the removal of these toxins. Long-hour HD and long-hour haemodiafiltration (HDF) may also improve haemodynamic stability which is an important factor in treatment quality. The investigators aim to study the removal of uremic toxins in long-hour HD and HDF and to compare the haemodynamics between 4-hour and 8-hour HD and HDF. Objectives: The primary aim is to study the removal of (especially protein-bound) uremic toxins in 4-hour and 8-hour HD and HDF. A secondary aim is to compare the haemodynamic response between 4-hour and 8-hour HD and HDF.
This is a randomized, open-label, multicenter, Phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of eribulin with dacarbazine in subjects with advanced soft tissue sarcoma who have disease progression within 6 months prior to study enrolment following standard therapies which must have included an anthracycline, unless contraindicated and then at least one additional regimen after failure of the anthracycline.
This will be a randomized, open-label, four-group, two-period, replicate design study to evaluate the effect of food on within and between subject variability in second generation formulation 20-mg tablet strengths, Lots P01008ZZA and P01009ZZA, administered as single doses of 40mg to 84 healthy male and female subjects. The study is powered to detect both a reduction in either the within or between subject variability (coefficient of variation [CV]%) of approximately 35%.
Main Study (CACZ885M2301): The purpose of the pivotal phase of this trial was to test the hypothesis that canakinumab treatment of patients with myocardial infarction (MI) at least one month prior to study entry and elevated hsCRP could prevent recurrent cardiovascular events. The purpose of the extension phase of the main study is to collect additional long-term safety data on continued exposure to canakinumab in patients who participated in the pivotal phase. Sub-study 1 (CACZ885M2301S1): The purpose of this sub-study was to evaluate the effect of quarterly subcutaneous canakinumab treatment for 24 months comparted with placebo on the carotid plaque burden measured by integrated vascular MRI in patients enrolled in the CACZ885M2301 study (CANTOS). Sub-study 2 (CACZ885M2301S2): The purpose of this CANTOS sub-study was to determine whether, in patients with type 2 diabetes participating in the CANTOS main study, canakinumab compared to placebo, on top of standard of care could increase insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity.
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of RO4905417 in patients with non ST-elevation myocardial infarction (Non-STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients will be randomized to receive an intravenous infusion of either 5 mg/kg RO4905417 or 20 mg/kg RO4905417 or placebo before PCI. Follow-up will be for 4 months.
The Essure procedure, FDA approved since 2002 and CE Mark approved since 2001, is the first permanent birth control method that can be performed in the comfort of a physician's office without hormones, cutting, burning or the risks associated with general anesthesia or tubal ligation. Soft, flexible inserts are placed in a woman's fallopian tubes through the cervix without incisions. Over the next three months, the body forms a natural barrier around the micro-inserts to prevent sperm from reaching the egg. Three months after the Essure procedure, a doctor performs an Essure Confirmation Test. In the United States, this test is called a hysterosalpingogram and evaluates the location of the inserts and whether the fallopian tubes are blocked. Outside of the United States, a standard x-ray is performed to evaluate the location of the inserts. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether a transvaginal ultrasound is an effective method of confirming micro-insert location.