There are about 13332 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Netherlands. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
This study aims to study the digestibility of isolated duckweed protein. The digestibility of the isolated duckweed protein will be compared to an isolated benchmark protein whey. Objective: The primary objective is to investigate the digestibility of isolated duckweed protein and the isolated benchmark protein whey. Study design: The study is a cross-over, double blind, controlled trial in which study participants will visit the research facility on two occasions under fasting conditions. Subjects will receive two protein sources in randomized order with a washout period of one week. Blood will be collected via a catheter before and up-to 3 hours after protein consumption. Study population: We aim to include 12 healthy volunteers aged 18-50 years. Intervention: Study participants will receive 20 grams of isolated duckweed protein and the isolated benchmark protein whey. Main study parameters/endpoints: The main study parameter is blood amino acids measured before and after consumption of 20 g protein.
Rationale: Diminutive colorectal polyps (1-5mm in size) have a high prevalence and very low risk of harbouring cancer. Current practice is to send all these polyps for histopathological assessment by the pathologist. If an endoscopist would be able to correctly predict the histology of these diminutive polyps during colonoscopy, histopathological examination could be omitted and practise could become more time- and cost-effective. Studies have shown that prediction of histology by the endoscopist remains dependent on training and experience and varies greatly between endoscopists, even after systematic training. Computer aided diagnosis (CAD) based on convolutional neural networks (CNN) may facilitate endoscopists in diminutive polyp differentiation. Up to date, studies comparing the diagnostic performance of CAD-CNN to a group of endoscopists performing optical diagnosis during real-time colonoscopy are lacking. Objective: To develop a CAD-CNN system that is able to differentiate diminutive polyps during colonoscopy with high accuracy and to compare the performance of this system to a group of endoscopist performing optical diagnosis, with the histopathology as the gold standard. Study design: Multicentre, prospective, observational trial. Study population: Consecutive patients who undergo screening colonoscopy (phase 2) Main study parameters/endpoints: The accuracy of optical diagnosis of diminutive colorectal polyps (1-5mm) by CAD-CNN system compared with the accuracy of the endoscopists. Histopathology is used as the gold standard.
This study will be conducted in 3 parts. A) compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a single dose of AZ-009 with that of a therapeutically-relevant dose of a commercially available apomorphine injector in healthy volunteers; B) ascending doses of active drug in healthy volunteers; and C) examine the tolerability, safety, and PK of AZ-009 in subjects with established Parkinson's disease.
The study is a randomised, cross-over, double blind, controlled trial in which study participants will visit the research facility on two occasions under fasting conditions with a washout period of one week. During each visit, study subjects will receive a test shake with phospholipid-bound choline or a control shake with choline added as a salt and DHA added separately. The two shakes will be given in randomised order and blood will be collected via a catheter before and up-to 6 hours after choline consumption. All study participants will receive a standardised evening meal prior to each study day and asked not to drink alcohol or perform heavy exercise the day before each study day. Study subjects are also asked to avoid choline rich products the day before each test day. Study participants are offered a meal after the test day.
Global, Post-Market, Prospective, Multi-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial of the VenaSeal™ Closure System vs. Surgical Stripping or Endothermal Ablation (ETA) for the Treatment of Early and Advanced Stage Superficial Venous Disease
This is a multicenter, single arm, phase II study evaluating the efficacy of image-guided de-escalating neoadjuvant treatment with paclitaxel, Herceptin® (trastuzumab), carboplatin, and pertuzumab (PTC-Ptz) in stage II-Ill HER2-positive breast cancer.
This protocol will be used to collect crucial components of the immune system from healthy volunteers for the characterization of immune cells in fresh blood. A pipeline has been set up for comprehensive immune phenotyping of both lymphoid and myeloid cells within 24 hours after blood withdrawal.
Aim: to investigate the role of inflammation and auto-immunity in pulmonary arterial hypertension by using the profile of volatile organic compounds. Hypothesis: first, the investigators hypothesize that at time of diagnosis the VOC profiles will discriminate patients with PAH-CTD and idiopathic PAH (IPAH) from patients with systemic sclerosis or systemic lupus erythematosus (CTD) without PAH, supporting the contention that there is a overlapping inflammatory and auto-immune pathway in PAH. During follow-up, the investigators will measure the VOC profiles of patients in all three groups who will be treated according standard clinical care. The hypothesis is that VOC profiles are affected by therapy.
The researchers are doing this study to see if semaglutide can slow down the growth and worsening of chronic kidney disease in people with type 2 diabetes. Participants will get semaglutide (active medicine) or placebo ('dummy medicine'). This is known as participants' study medicine - which treatment participants get is decided by chance. Semaglutide is a medicine, doctors can prescribe in some countries for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Participants will get the study medicine in a pen. Participants will use the pen to inject the medicine in a skin fold once a week. The study will close when there is enough information collected to show clear result of the study. The total time participants will be in this study is about 3 to 5 years, but it could be longer.
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of 3 different doses of ExPEC10V and to select the optimal dose for further clinical development (Cohort 1). Cohort 2 is aimed to expand the dataset supporting the short- and long-term safety and immunogenicity of the optimal dose of ExPEC10V, selected from the primary analysis results of Cohort 1. Cohort 2 will include participants in stable health with a history of urinary tract infection (UTI) in the past 5 years and will be included in the study to support the plan for late stage development of ExPEC vaccine.