There are about 13332 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Netherlands. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in combination with Standard of Care, versus Standard of Care alone, in adult male patients with mHSPC. In this study, the SoC is defined as a combination of Androgen Receptor Directed Therapy + Androgen Deprivation Therapy. Approximately 1126 patients will be randomized in this study. As of 31-Jan-2024, 1144 participants have been enrolled in 20 countries.
Palliative Sedation (PS) is defined as the intentional lowering of consciousness of a patient in the last phase of life, to relieve patients suffering from refractory symptoms. For those symptoms all possible effective treatments, within an acceptable timeframe, are exhausted. Several studies have been performed about palliative sedation, mostly focusing on continuous deep sedation, with the use of various measurements to monitor its effect. Efficacy of continuous palliative sedation has been monitored by agitation/distress levels, symptom control, levels of sedation/awareness, comfort, safety and family/caregivers satisfaction. Differences between studies occur, for instance in definition, application and monitoring. Consequently reported outcomes and associated treatment goals differ between studies which makes it difficult to compare the results. Within this international multicenter observational study, the investigators aim to evaluate the effects of palliative sedation on patient's comfort levels. Participants with different forms and intensity of palliative sedation (intermittent and continuous, from light to deep) are included in a prospective design as part of an international study. Objectives: 1. To evaluate the effect of palliative sedation on participants' comfort and other symptoms in different international hospices, palliative care units and hospital ward settings. 2. To assess the clinical practice of palliative sedation in different international care settings and the accompanying costs and consequences. Study design: Prospective observational multicentre study in hospices, palliative care units and hospital ward settings in five European countries (Belgium, Germany, Italy, Spain, The Netherlands).
Background of the study: Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer in Dutch women. Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) substantially improves chances for survival after primary breast cancer. In practice, many women experience difficulties to adhere to treatment: besides missing single or multiple doses of medication, up to 50% of patients stop treatment prematurely due to decreased treatment motivation over time and burden of side effects. Together with patients and health care professionals, we adapted a cost-effective behavior change intervention (AIMS) for women using adjuvant endocrine therapy after breast cancer to an add-on module in regular follow up care. Objective of the study: The primary aim of this study is to pilot test the feasibility of the AIMS-AET intervention versus usual treatment on medication adherence in breast cancer survivors on adjuvant endocrine therapy. Intervention effects on psychosocial determinants and user experiences will be evaluated. The feasibility of testing the AIMS-AET intervention in a bigger RCT will be assessed. The secondary objective is to assess (preliminary) intervention effects on adherence, physical activity and on quality of life. Study design: A pilot randomised controlled trial comparing AIMS AET to usual care with an extensive mixed-methods process evaluation. Study population: Female outpatients of 2 Dutch hospitals with a prescription for adjuvant endocrine therapy after primary breast cancer. Intervention (if applicable): An in-person delivered intervention imbedded in regular follow-up care during 9-months. Patients will receive an electronic monitoring System to track medication intake and a pedometer to count daily amount of steps. During the baseline visit, the health care professional (HCP) will use pre-tested materials for informing and motivating patients; and collaboratively set goals and plans for medication adherence and physical activity. During regular follow-up consultations with the HCP, personalized visual reports of medication intake and amount of steps will be evaluated to enhance patients awareness of their (non-)adherence and (in)activity and identify any problems and solutions to reduce undesired behaviour. The control group will receive usual treatment only.
Rationale Many patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) need hospital admission for oxygen supplementation. A substantial number of patients need intensive care unit (ICU) admission for escalation of care. ICU doctors and nurses are struggling to provide the best care for patients with COVID-19. Practice of adjunctive and supportive treatments remains uncertain. Objective To determine and compare practice of adjunctive and supportive treatments for COVID-19 in the Netherlands, and to determine their independent associations with outcome. Hypotheses Practice of adjunctive and supportive treatments for COVID-19 varies substantially. Adjunctive and supportive treatments have an independent association with outcome in ICU patients with COVID-19. Study design National/international, multicenter, retrospective observational study. Study population Intensive care unit (ICU) patients with COVID-19. Methods In this study we will collect data on diverse treatments during the first 28 days in ICU, including (a) the types of oxygen support* and awake prone positioning; (b) the types of ventilatory support, (c) rescue therapies for refractory hypoxemia during invasive ventilation (prone positioning, ventilator adjustments, continuous muscle paralysis, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation); (d) adjunctive treatments, including thromboprophylaxis and anticoagulation, antiviral and immunomodulating therapies, and (e) experimental supportive treatments. Outcomes include duration of each adjunctive treatment, duration of ventilation, incidence of tracheostomy, duration of stay in ICU and mortality until day 90. Study endpoints A combination of adjunctive treatments, including types of oxygen support, ventilatory support and rescue therapies for refractory hypoxemia during invasive ventilation (primary), other adjunctive and supportive treatments, tracheostomy rate; duration of ventilation and ventilator-free days and alive at day 28 (VFD-28), duration of ICU and hospital stay, and ICU, hospital and 90-day mortality. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness Retrospective collection of data regarding adjunctive treatments, and clinical endpoints is without risk for ICU patients. *In a subset of patients we will collect granular data (every two hours) regarding oxygenation (FiO2, inspiratory tidal volume, air flow, respiratory rate, SpO2, PaO2, and PEEP) over the first 2 full calendar days of ICU admission. The primary endpoint of this sub-analysis will be the amount of oxygen used with different respiratory support interventions. The statistical analysis plan for the analysis of these data that were collected in two ICUs that participated in the national study, and one additional ICU in Spain is uploaded in the document section (filename Statistical Analysis Plan PROXY-COVID)
This study will assess whether switching participants who have benefitted from mepolizumab or benralizumab to GSK3511294 (Depemokimab) is non-inferior to maintaining current treatment on the annualized rate of clinically significant exacerbations in participants with severe asthma with an eosinophilic phenotype. Throughout the study, all participants will continue their non-biologic Baseline standard of care (SoC) asthma treatment.
The iLIVE medication study is a before-after study where medication optimisation of patients with an estimated life expectancy of six months is investigated. The investigators will include 400 patients in 3 countries. The primary outcome is an assessment of the quality of life of patients, four weeks after baseline assessment
Investigators plan to characterize systemic inflammation and circulating immune cells in participants with moderate and severe calcific aortic valve disease and matched healthy controls.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of 4 cycles of combinatory immunotherapy (ipilimumab and nivolumab), followed by monotherapy nivolumab in participants with immunogenic metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Academic educations concurs with a lot of sitting. Studies have shown that prolonged sitting not only has disruptive effects on physical health, but also influence mental health and cognition negatively. For physical health evidence grows that short light intense interruptions of sitting time effectively counterbalance the impact of prolonged sitting. It is not clear of light intense physical activity breaks have a similar positive effect on cognitive performance. Also, it is unclear whether cognitive loading might be able to compensate the impact of prolonged sitting.This study compares the effects of uninterrupted sitting with or without cognitive loading and interrupted sitting on cognitive functioning; muscle activation of leg and trunk muscles under various modes of sitting with walking, in order to calibrate the physical impact of different sitting modes.
This study will collect information on immune response and adverse events after vaccination against coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in a vulnerable patient cohort. Understanding the ability or disability to mount a protective immune response after vaccination will help to counsel patients during the pandemic and support decisions on whom to vaccinate and to identify patients who require other measures to protect them from COVID-19.