There are about 13332 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Netherlands. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
410 Dutch type 2 diabetes patients will be randomized using a 5:1 ratio to intervention group versus control, to a lifestyle intervention program given via a mobile application and digital platform. Active participants will undergo diabetyping, where blood glucose and c-peptide responses to a glucose challenge are measured, and be recommended to follow a calorie-restricted (minimum 500 kcal deficit) low-carbohydrate, or restricted carbohydrate (120g) Mediterranean diet and customized exercise program for a period of 24 weeks. Individuals will then be followed for a period of 2 years following the intervention.
Randomized phase II trial. The study aims to investigate a different and potentially safer radio therapeutic treatment method for brain metastases. The current standard of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) in one or three fractions is compared to fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT) in five fractions.
Rationale: In the treatment, care and isolation of COVID-19 patients, one of the most important issues is determining the duration of infectiousness. The current Dutch guideline advises at least 14 days of isolation for seriously ill patients, which is the case for most admitted patients, and at least 21 days for intubated patients. It is believed that in most cases this isolation duration is too long, which is highly undesirable for patients staying in closed single-occupancy rooms. This is known to result in limited contact with healthcare workers (HCW) and to be associated with a higher level of depression among patients. The longer the isolation, the higher the workload for HCW and the higher the costs (e.g. with about 0.5 million admission days in the Netherlands, these work out at about €14 million on personal protective equipment [PPE] and cleaning alone). Additionally, isolation demands a larger healthcare workforce, yielding less capacity to provide other care to non-COVID-19 patients, with numerous other consequences. On the other hand, it is possible that some patients were discontinued from isolation too early, leading to a risk of transmission to other patients and to HCW. In conclusion, duration of isolation should be as short as possible for proper patient flow and to avoid unnecessary burden to patients and HCW, and thus to healthcare in general. Therefore, there is an urgent need to define the period of infectiousness of COVID-19. We will develop a safe and effective algorithm for decision on timely discontinuation of isolation of COVID-19 hospitalized patients. Objective: The ultimate goal of this project is to produce new evidence-based criteria for the termination of isolation of hospitalized COVID-19 patients that are safe (very low subsequent risk of transmission to other patients or healthcare workers) while reducing the number of unnecessary days in isolation (thereby improving quality of life of patients, reducing hospital costs, and making optimal use of the scarce number of isolation beds). Multiple sources of data and evidence will be integrated to arrive at these new criteria.
The overall objective of this study is to describe the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients with a positive and negative AIR-test result. Second, the investigators wish to describe the incidence of a positive AIR-test and its association with the development of PPC. In addition, the investigators aim to describe whether mechanical ventilation strategy differs between patients with a positive and negative AIR-test.
Rationale: Patients with mitral valve insufficiency suffer from left atrial remodeling. Atrial fibrosis is part of this remodeling process. The presence of atrial fibrosis is associated with adverse events. Currently, mitral valve repair surgery is the ultimate treatment for severe primary mitral valve insufficiency. The main indications and timing for surgery are severe mitral valve insufficiency with symptoms or left ventricular dysfunction. However, the role of atrial fibrosis in this process remains undetermined despite its well-recognized clinical implications. Characterization of atrial fibrosis patterns in mitral valve insufficiency patients might be potentially valuable for the indication and timing of mitral valve repair surgery in order to improve clinical outcomes. To date, however, mitral valve insufficiency patients suffering from left atrial remodeling have hardly been studied using these new imaging techniques. Therefore, the investigators intend to combine advanced cardiac MRI and post-processing techniques prior to and after mitral valve repair surgery to gain more insight in the clinical implications of atrial fibrosis in this patient population. It is hypothesized that the atrial fibrosis surface area paradoxically will increase after mitral valve surgery because of global shrinkage of the left atrium caused by the reversed remodeling process. As a consequence, more frequently atrial fibrosis related events including (paroxysmal) atrial fibrillation, may be observed in these patients. Objective: To assess the effects of (reduced) volume overload on the left atrial wall texture (presence, amount and location of atrial fibrosis) and associated geometry and function in patients with mitral valve insufficiency, prior to and after mitral valve repair surgery. Study design: Single center pilot study. Study population: The research population consists of mitral valve insufficiency patients scheduled for elective surgical mitral valve repair (N=20) according to the current European guideline criteria.
A prospective, non-interventional, natural history study to assess the occurrence of higher FNAIT risk across a broad population of different racial and ethnic characteristics and the occurrence of HPA-1a alloimmunization in these women.
Rationale: Lumbar spine surgery is associated with high postoperative pain scores and analgesic use, despite use of multimodal analgesia. The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a promising locoregional anesthetic technique for this type of surgery. The literature is not yet conclusive about the effectiveness of this technique on reducing postoperative pain intensity. Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the analgesic effect of ESPB as add-on therapy to multimodal analgesia on early postoperative pain intensity after lumbar spinal fusion surgery compared to placebo. Study design: The study is designed as a prospective mono-centre, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Study population: 76 patients ≥ 18 years of age requiring elective lumbar spinal fusion surgery involving one to four fusion levels. Intervention: Patients will receive ultrasound-guided ESPB with either ropivacaine or placebo at the end of surgery. Main study parameters/endpoints: Main study parameter is pain intensity upon emergence from anesthesia measured with the Numeric Rating Scale. A minimal clinically important difference is considered to be a decrease of 1.5 points. Secondary endpoints are pain intensity during hospital stay and after 30 days, opioid use during hospital stay and after 30 days, opioid side effects, use of anti-emetics, time to first opioid use/request, length of hospital stay, quality of recovery at discharge. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: The Sint Maartenskliniek is experienced in applying locoregional analgesia, the use of ropivacaine and using sonography. The procedure of administering ESPB has a very low risk of complications. Receiving placebo is justifiable because this group will not be withhold standard treatment. The risks of receiving placebo are negligible. The patients will visit the clinic at regular follow-up moments.
The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of DTX301 on the improvement of ornithine transcarbamylase (OTC) function by maintaining safe plasma ammonia levels with removal of dietary protein restriction and alternative pathway medication.
Rationale: The Baerveldt glaucoma drainage device (GDD) successfully reduces intraocular pressure but also involves a risk of corneal endothelial deterioration. Supposedly, the tip of a GDD tube with a thinner diameter, such as the Paul implant, will remain at a larger distance from the cornea and, thereby, cause less damage. Objective: To determine whether the Paul tube induces less damage to the corneal endothelium than the Baerveldt GDD. Study design: Randomized clinical trial. Study population: Phakic patients scheduled for surgical GDD implantation. Intervention: Either a Baerveldt or a Paul GDD implant. Main study parameters/endpoints: Endothelial cell density and tube position at 24 months. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: The Paul GDD may have a less harmful effect on corneal endothelium. Otherwise, both GDDs will probably have a similar risk/benefit profile. The risks of study-related assessments are negligible, burden is low, extra time is about 5 x 1.5 h (total 7.5 h) in two years.
Rationale: Patients with chest pain usually undergo multiple diagnostic examinations to demonstrate or rule out atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (CAD). In addition to high healthcare costs, some of the examinations do not assess the presence of CAD, which means that patients may be undertreated and are at risk for myocardial infarction. A uniform diagnostic and treatment strategy that uses computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) as initial examination may reduce major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and may reduce healthcare costs. In addition, we hypothesize that this strategy improves angina-related health status and reduces the number of invasive coronary angiograms (CAG's). Objectives: - To show that the intervention is non-inferior to the control with regards to clinical outcomes - To show superiority of the intervention with regards to clinical outcomes Study design: National multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial. Study population: Patients with suspected stable CAD. Intervention: upfront CTCA to diagnose CAD and guide optimal medical therapy (OMT). Patients with obstructive CAD and refractory angina despite OMT will undergo non-invasive ischemia imaging to guide revascularization. Control: Standard of care. Diagnosis and treatment are at the discretion of the attending cardiologist. Main study end point: Composite of all-cause mortality and non-fatal myocardial infarction.