There are about 13332 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Netherlands. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The purpose of this study is to study the pharmacokinetics of anidulafungin (Ecalta ®) given intravenously as antifungal prophylaxis to recipients of an allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant following myeloablative chemotherapy or patients receiving intensive chemotherapy for AML-MDS who are at high risk for developing invasive fungal disease.
Background: Parkinson's Disease and the Atypical Parkinsonian Disorder (like Multiple System Atrophy, Progressive Supranuclear Palsy, Corticobasal Degeneration, Lewy Body Dementia) are disease entities with partly common symptomatology. Especially very early in the course of disease, the differentiation between both disease entities can be challenging, even for specialists in the field of movement disorder. However, the establishment of a correct diagnosis is very important for adequate patientcounseling, treatment and the correct inclusion of patients in research trials. Ancillary diagnostic investigations are looked upon to aid in this diagnostic dilemma. Objective: To investigate the value of ancillary diagnostic investigations, more specific MRI, analysis of cerebrospinal fluids and a second opinion in a specialized movement disorder centre, to differentiate Parkinson's disease and the Atypical Parkisonisonian disorder.
Background The treatment of diabetes is multidisciplinary. Alignment of care of the various professional disciplines is, however, not always optimal. This can lead to confusion about treatment interventions and behavioral advices. In adolescence, good fine-tuned care is of extreme importance because of the difficulties in regulation of the disease in this phase of life (Snoek, 2004). These difficulties are due to biological changes but also to socio-psychological developmental changes. The adolescents' psychological development demands more autonomy and responsibility for the diabetes (care) by the adolescent. The social development can conflict with the treatment regime, because of the adolescents' social needs (ADA, 2001; Houdijk, 1998; Snoek, 2004). In this study the investigators assess whether an interactive website, on which adolescents with diabetes and their treatment team can communicate, leads to better alignment of care and better control over the disease. Intervention The diabetes has great impact on the adolescents' everyday life. Finding a balance between more autonomy, participating in social life with (healthy) peers and control of the disease is difficult and seems to act as a thread during this phase in life. This can lead to questions and uncertainty at any given moment. The interactive website provides the adolescent access to information and to his or her individual treatment plan and advices fitted to his or her condition and life. The adolescent can pose questions at any given moment through the online forum and their personal treatment page. Since the treatment team answers the question within a day, fit between diabetes care and adolescents' everyday life is optimized. Research question Does an online interactive treatment environment, on which adolescents with diabetes can communicate with their treatment team, lead to better fit of care and to better disease control?
To compare the renal protective properties of two currently used anaesthetic techniques - a sevoflurane-remifentanil/sufentanil combination with a propofol-remifentanil/sufentanil combination for anaesthesia in patients undergoing living donor kidney donation/transplantation.
The purpose of the study is optimising current treatments in schizophrenia and explore novel therapeutic options for schizophrenia. The study intends to both address basic, but so far unanswered, questions in the treatment of schizophrenia and develop new interventions. It is expected that the project will lead to evidence that is directly applicable to treatment guidelines, and will identify potential mechanisms for new drug development.
This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of ocrelizumab in comparison with interferon beta-1a (Rebif) in participants with relapsing multiple sclerosis. Participants will be randomized to receive either ocrelizumab 600 mg or matching placebo intravenous (IV) as 300 mg infusions on Days 1 and 15 for the first dose and as a single infusion of 600 mg for all subsequent infusions every 24 weeks, with placebo injections matching interferon beta-1a SC three times per week; or interferon beta-1a 44 mcg SC injections three times per week (with placebo infusions matching ocrelizumab infusions every 24 weeks). Planned duration of double-blind treatment is 96 weeks. Participants who complete the 96-week double-blind treatment will have an option to enter a single-group, active-treatment, open-label extension period, providing they fulfill the eligibility criteria.
Rationale: Vitiligo vulgaris is a common acquired pigment disorder, which is characterised by the development of depigmented macules. It develops probably due to immunedestruction of melanocytes. Most effective therapies are immunsuppresive: 1. local immunesuppressives like corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors 2. phototherapy like PUVA and NB-UVB phototherapy. NB-UVB is the first choice A synergistic effect of UVA and topical corticosteroids (fluticasone proprionate 0.05% cream) has been described by Westerhof et al. in 1999. To our knowledge to date there are no publications comparing NB-UVB combined with a topical corticosteroid and NB-UVB alone. Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical effects (onset and degree of repigmentation) of fluticasone proprionate 0.05% cream (thrice weekly) on NB-UVB phototherapy twice weekly for a period of 12 months. Study design: Prospective single blinded randomised controlled study. Study population: Consecutive patients ≥ 18 years, diagnosed with active vitiligo vulgaris who will receive NB-UVB phototherapeutic treatment at the Netherlands Institute for Pigment Disorders at the Academic Medical Centre (AMC), University of Amsterdam. Methods: The patient will be randomised for either NB-UVB phototherapy and fluticasone proprionate 0.05% cream or NB-UVB phototherapy alone for 12 consecutive months. Main study parameters/endpoints: The onset and degree of repigmentation is assessed by digital image analysis of a target lesion and blinded global physician assessment. Furthermore, the patients and doctors satisfaction will be assessed and changes of immunohistochemical parameters will be analysed in skin biopsies. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Subjects participating in the study will be asked to visit the institute 4 times. The time investment will be 20 minutes per visit. Additionally, patients will be asked for consent to take punch biopsies (3 mm) at the beginning and at the end of the treatment period. Hence, skin biopsies are not compulsory for participation in this study. Patients may chose to participate in the clinical non invasive part of the study. Known side effects of the NB-UVB phototherapy are redness, pruritus, xerosis cutis, burning sensation and conjunctivitis. These side-effects however, are largely dose-dependent and avoidable. Corticosteroid associated systemic side-effects (suppression of the adrenocortex) will be minimized by treating only a limited body surface [a maximum of 30% body surface] and by using an intermittent application scheme of three days a week in the long term treatment. The regions which are known to have a higher absorption are excluded (periorbital, axillary, inguinal and genital area). Both topical corticosteroids and NB-UVB are part of the Dutch and British guidelines for the treatment of vitiligo. There is no presumptive evidence or indication that the combination of these therapies may result in a higher risk of side effects. All together the burden due to the study is low and the risk for systemic or local side effects is low.
Many patients with breastcancer in the past, were treated with TAC. These last years, there is more and more focus on the effects of chemotherapy, particularly in children treated with this. One of these effects is damage to the heart muscle, which ultimately might affect the pump-function of the heart . In adults, the effect of treatment with TAC on the heart, has not been previously investigated. The possibility exists that the adverse reactions in children are found in adults also could occur. Therefore we have initiated this trial.
Patients with advanced kidney cancer or GIST (Gastro Intestinal Stromal Tumor: this is a tumor of the intestines) may be eligible for treatment with one of the following drugs: sunitinib (Sutent ®) or sorafenib (Nexavar ®). These drugs inhibit blood vessel formation in cancer cells. These cancer cells are hampered in their growth. To enlarge the investigators knowledge on the effects and side effects of these two medicines, in the University Medical Center St. Radboud lot of research is done. This study is a part of that. Patients receiving sunitinib or sorafenib tell sometimes that they feel that they are less able to concentrate, that their memory is not working properly or that they are less able to imagine a solution to a complex problem . Perhaps you recognize these symptoms as well. In how many of the patients this occurs, how severe the symptoms are and how it is caused, is still unknown. The goal of this research is to examine how memory, concentration and knowledge processing works in patients using sorafenib or sunitinib. With the research the investigators hope to get answers to the following questions: 1. How common are problems with memory, concentration and processing of knowledge in patients receiving the drug sunitinib or sorafenib? 2. What are the problems of memory, concentration and processing of knowledge in the use of sunitinib or sorafenib? 3. What could be the cause of the problems that patients experience from memory, concentration and processing of knowledge in the use of sunitinib or sorafenib? 4. Is there a link between problems with memory, concentration and processing of knowledge and also experiences of fatigue or mood of a patient?
This study uses one trialdrug: Temsirolimus (sometimes called Torisel ® ). Temsirolimus is an mTOR inhibitor. It is an agent that is specifically aimed at disrupting cell division (needed for cancer cell growth). Temsirolimus has been shown to inhibit the growth of cancer cells. For patients with metastatic kidney cancer Temsirolimus is now a registered , conventional therapy. It has been recorded for patients as they get renal cell cancer metastases and which looks as if the tumor is aggressive. This is a phase II trial. This means that the investigators look at how effectively temsirolimus is, after treatment with other drugs against kidney cancer. Effective means that the investigators see how well the treatment is, the investigators look at how long the disease is not growing and if it does, that is smaller. The possible side effects will be carefully watched.