There are about 21062 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Italy. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
.Assessing efficacy of rehabilitation with virtual reality exercises compared to traditional rehabilitation in the patient's operated hip arthroplasty
The aim of this observational study is the creation of a national multiple myeloma registry to monitor the current routine clinical practice in Italy and describe the standard of care adopted for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with multiple myeloma in the different Italian hematology centers.
This is a prospective multicenter international single-arm observational study to demonstrate that use of stent-assisted coiling with LVIS™ Evo™ and HydroCoil® Embolic System (HES) in intracranial aneurysm treatment is effective and safe when assessed at 1 year after the procedure
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of a daily consumption for 2 weeks of a sourdough croissant enriched with dietary fibers vs a control sourdough croissant with no fiber added on daily energy intakes, fasting metabolic parameters, inflammatory status, blood pressure, anthropometric measures, body composition, appetite sensations, gastrointestinal functionality and gut microbiota composition.
Researchers are looking for a better way to treat advanced solid cancers including head and neck cancer, lung cancer and bladder cancer. In some people with cancer a protein called Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor (AhR) can prevent immune cells from fighting tumor cells. The study drug, BAY 2416964, is a small molecule which blocks the AhR allowing the body to use its immune response against the cancer cells. Researchers think that BAY 2416964 given together with a cancer treatment called pembrolizumab may help shrink tumors in people with cancer. The main aims of this study are to find for BAY 2416964 in combination with pembrolizumab, - how safe this drug combination is - how it affects the body (also referred to as tolerability) - the highest amount of BAY 2416964 that can be given in combination with pembrolizumab without too many side effects. The researchers will also study the action of BAY 2416964 in combination with pembrolizumab against the cancer. The participants in this study will get BAY 2416964 and pembrolizumab. BAY 2416964 will be given by mouth. Pembrolizumab will be given as an intravenous (IV) infusion. An IV infusion is given through a needle into a vein. This study will have two parts. The first part will help find the most appropriate dose that can be given in the second part. Each participant of the first, so called dose escalation part, will be assigned to one specific dose group for BAY 2416964. The amount of BAY 2416964 that is given changes step-wise from one group to the next. The dose of pembrolizumab will always be the same. The participants of the second, so called dose expansion part, will receive the most appropriate dose of BAY 2416964 found in the first part. During the study, the participants will receive the treatment in 3-week periods called cycles. In each cycle, the participants will in general get pembrolizumab once and BAY 2416964 in a daily schedule. These 3-week cycles will be repeated throughout the trial. The participants can take the study treatment until their cancer gets worse, until they have medical problems, or until they leave the trial. Participants will have around 4 visits in each cycle. Some of the visits can also be done via phone. During the study, the study doctors and their team will: - take blood and urine samples - check if the participants' cancer has changed in size using computed tomography scans or magnetic resonance imaging scans of the participants' tumors - check the participants' overall health - ask the participants questions about how they are feeling and what adverse events they are having. An adverse event is any medical problem that a participant has during a study. Doctors keep track of all adverse events that happen in studies, even if they do not think the adverse events might be related to the study treatments.
This is a Phase 2/3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group, multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of ravulizumab in adult participants with dermatomyositis (DM).
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of the Exablate Model 4000 Type 2.0 used as a tool to disrupt the BBB in patients with high grade glioma undergoing standard of care therapy.
Primary Objective -To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab compared to omalizumab in reducing the polyp size and improving sense of smell Secondary Objectives - To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in improving CRSwNP symptoms at Week 24 compared to omalizumab - To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in improving lung function at Week 24 compared to omalizumab - To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in improving CRSwNP total symptom score (TSS) at Week 24 compared to omalizumab - To evaluate the effect of dupilumab on health related quality of life (HRQoL) at week 24 compared to omalizumab - To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in improving nasal peak inspiratory flow at Week 24 compared to omalizumab - To evaluate the effect of dupilumab on CRSwNP overall disease severity at Week 24 compared to omalizumab - To evaluate the effect of dupilumab on asthma control at Week 24 compared to omalizumab - To evaluate the safety of dupilumab and omalizumab
The aim of the study is to compare the 6 months clinical outcome of the treatment with a single intra-articular collagen injection versus a single placebo (saline solution) infiltration in the infiltrative treatment of knee osteoarthritis. The evaluation will be performed through clinical, subjective and objective assessments.
The aim of this pilot study is to analyze the effect of SVF injection produced by adipose tissue processing, in terms of clinical improvement, in patients with moderate to severe (stage 1-3) ankle osteoarthritis. Evaluation will be performed by administering pre-operative and post-operative clinical assessment questionnaires. Patients will be followed-up with a pre-operative evaluation and post-operative evaluations at 30 days, 3-6-12, and 24 months after application.