View clinical trials related to Ankle Osteoarthritis.
Filter by:The objective of this study is to compare primary total ankle replacement (TAR) performed with a customized procedure (prostheses customized for each patient based on his or her ankle morphology reconstructed from tomographic scans, and implanted via cutting guides customized for the patient) with standard primary TARs, considering: objective radiological results, subjective patient outcomes, and overall costs of both procedures
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of heparin-conjugated gel for treating ankle joint cartilage lesions compared to the conventional microfracture method. It involves 40 participants aged 18 to 65 with localized cartilage defects (Outerbridge II-IV) in the ankle's talus bone. Participants will be divided into two groups: the main group and the control group. The main group will undergo a two-stage process. Initially, adipose tissue will be collected via lipoaspiration from osteoarthritis patients. This tissue will be used to isolate mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and extract growth factors, resulting in a biocomposite hydrogel. In the second stage, arthroscopy will be performed to apply the hydrogel for cartilage treatment. The control group will undergo standard microfracture surgery, a known cartilage repair method. The study's main objective is to compare heparin-conjugated gel treatment to microfracture in terms of cartilage repair and patient outcomes. A 12-month follow-up will assess short-term and potential mid-term effects. Data will be analyzed using Microsoft Excel and Statistica 13.0 for descriptive and comprehensive statistical analysis. Quantitative indicators will be assessed using appropriate tests (Mann-Whitney, Wilcoxon T, χ2) to determine significant differences between groups. The study addresses key questions: Does heparin-conjugated gel offer better cartilage repair, functional improvement, and pain reduction than microfracture? Does the hydrogel approach better preserve joint integrity and slow degeneration? Are there complications with either method? This study combines cellular and surgical components to explore innovative cartilage lesion treatments. Comparing with microfracture and using a thorough follow-up, it aims to enhance cartilage repair techniques and patient outcomes.
The objective is to study the joint kinematics of the prosthetic implant, in terms of translation, rotation, Range of motion and proprioception, in patients treated for prosthetic replacement of the ankle, quantitatively and under physiological load conditions.
Patient Specific Instrumentation (PSI) is thought to quicken joint arthroplasty surgery by shortening the operation time and improving alignment. Studies about the learning curve of PSI for total ankle replacement (TAR) are lacking because it was only introduced in 2014. The investigators believe that PSI could give a beginning ankle surgeon, or surgeons new to TAR, an advantage since PSI facilitates the complex TAR procedure. As such, the availability of TAR in Dutch patients with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis could be extended. To estimate this potential of PSI for TAR, the investigators aim (1) to compare the alignment accuracy of TAR performed using PSI between a beginning and an experienced orthopedic surgeon, and (2) to determine the learning curve of TAR performed using PSI for a beginning foot and ankle specialist by comparing the operative time, complications, and patient-reported outcomes with those of an experienced specialist.
A minimum of 50 patients with ankle end-stage arthritis will be randomized in two parallel groups for surgery. One group will receive a total ankle replacement through an anterior approach and the other group a total ankle replacement via a lateral approach. Patients will be evaluated for a mean follow-up of two years in terms of complications, implant survival and functional results. One of the primary objectives of the study is analyzing the safety of the lateral and anterior approaches for total ankle replacement.
A Double-blind, Multi-Center, Prospective, Randomized Placebo-controlled Pilot Study Evaluating Intra-articular Injection of Axolotl Ambient Compared to Saline in Subjects with Ankle Osteoarthritis. The goal of this pilot study and subsequent pivotal trial is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Axolotl Ambient intra-articular injection for ameliorating the pain and dysfunction associated with ankle OA.
The aim of this pilot study is to analyze the effect of SVF injection produced by adipose tissue processing, in terms of clinical improvement, in patients with moderate to severe (stage 1-3) ankle osteoarthritis. Evaluation will be performed by administering pre-operative and post-operative clinical assessment questionnaires. Patients will be followed-up with a pre-operative evaluation and post-operative evaluations at 30 days, 3-6-12, and 24 months after application.
The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of the infiltrative therapy of BMAC vs HA up to 24 months in the treatment of the ankle osteoarthritis. The efficacy will be assessed through clinical, objective and subjective evaluations. After 12 months patients in the control group can decide to cross-over in the treatment group.
The Investigators hypothesize that an early 2 week post-operative protocol will have no difference in the successful osseointegration and stability of the total ankle replacement as compared to a delayed 6 week post-operative protocol. The importance of the research is to allow patients who receive a total ankle replacement to bear weight 4 weeks earlier than the current protocol with no negative effect on the osseointegration and stability of the ankle replacement.
This is a prospective, multi-location safety and effectiveness study, and data registry of autologous adult ADRCs generated by the Transpose® RT System in subjects with OA in the shoulder, wrist, knee, hip, or ankle.