There are about 10004 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Brazil. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
To compare changes in body mass index (BMI) Z-score following treatment with OLZ/SAM vs olanzapine
The lack of pain specialists limits users' access to non-pharmacological therapeutic pain control strategies. In this context, digital health programs can reduce the inequity of access to interventions, contribute to the self-management of chronic musculoskeletal conditions, reduce the burden on primary care and can help to reorganize the flow of referral of individuals in the health care network. The aim of this study will be to analyze the implementation and health outcomes of three online pain neuroscience education strategies in individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain. This is a hybrid type III effectiveness-implementation randomized controlled trial. Individuals with ≥18 years old with chronic musculoskeletal pain will be recruited from primary health care in the city of Guarapuava/PR/Brazil and referred to the health care network for conventional physical therapy in addition to the online pain neuroscience education program (EducaDor). The EducaDor program will be delivered in 3 modalities: 1) synchronous online; 2) asynchronous videos; 3) Interactive e-book. The implementation outcomes evaluated will be: acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, adoption, fidelity, penetration, sustainability and costs; and health outcomes will include: pain, functionality, quality of life, sleep, physical activity, self-efficacy, adverse effects, prognostic and risk groups. The evaluations will be done at baseline, after the end of the interventions and follow-up of 6 months.
A global study to evaluate transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in combination with durvalumab, tremelimumab and lenvatinib therapy in patients with locoregional hepatocellular carcinoma
Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is a common intervention in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The presence of new postoperative atrial fibrillation / atrial flutter (POAF) occurs in 15-40% of patients undergoing this procedure, with a high rate of complications, including increased hospital length of stay, with a consequent increase in the costs. In addition, the presence of POAF increases the rate of thromboembolic events such as stroke and mortality in the short and long term. Anticoagulant treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter (AF) lato sensu is already a well-established therapy in patients at high risk, defined by CHADS-VASC greater than or equal to 2. The use of direct-acting anticoagulants (DOACS) is standard therapy for those patients. In the POAF scenario, there is a recommendation for anticoagulation in high-risk patients for at least 30 days, however, despite being an entity with a poor prognosis in the short and long term, it is an undertreated entity. At present, there is no evidence of anticoagulant treatment of POAF with DOACS, and warfarin is the standard therapy. Warfarin is a drug that needs laboratory control of prothrombin time (PT) and anticoagulation bridge with other anticoagulants, usually using heparin and enoxaparin. We believe that because warfarin is the standard drug in this scenario, it is not prescribed on a regular basis, since it increases costs, length of hospital stay and is less effective than DOACS in AF lato sensu. Thus, the research project intends to compare the cost-effectiveness, assessed by QALY, related to the warfarin prescription strategy associated with bridge anticoagulation versus the rivaroxaban prescription in patients who presented POAF with a minimum duration of 12 hours or AF that requires intervention. Medications will be started during hospitalization. After randomization, anticoagulant medication will be started within 24 hours. The patient will be reassessed in 30 days and if there is no evidence of maintenance of AF, the anticoagulant medication will be discontinued and the standard treatment for CAD will be maintained. Secondary outcomes will be: clinical outcomes, such as: (1) Death; (2) stroke; (3) myocardial infarction (MI); (4) Readmission; (5) Systemic embolization; (6); Surgical reintervention; (6) Bleeding using the ISTH score; (7) Infection. The safety outcome will be the bleeding assessment according to the bleeding score of the ISTH (International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis). Considering that POAF is a prevalent entity and associated with a worse prognosis in the short and long term, as well as despite recommendations for guidelines to keep these patients anticoagulated, it is noted that the prescription of anticoagulation at hospital discharge is low. Considering that there is no clear evidence in studies on the use of DOAC in this population, we understand that the search for medications that lead to better cost-benefit, as well as better dosage and bleeding rates not lower than the use of warfarin, could lead to a higher rate prescribing anticoagulants for these patients, reducing costs, clinical and mortality outcomes.
Stigma prevents young transgender women from having access to HIV prevention and care services, despite the fact that these services are freely accessible to all Brazilians in the Unified Health System (ie, SUS). Levels of HIV testing and access to care for young people are uneven. The purpose of this proposal is to generate data to address stigma in the public health system and intervene to overcome the challenges of youth with the navigation of health systems. The Brilhar e Transcender (BeT) study will include young trans women, aged 18 to 24, in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The BeT intervention has been found to be preliminarily efficacious in a pilot study. This proposal is for a study to test the effectiveness of an intervention to improve HIV prevention and care engagement among young trans women (N=150) at risk of HIV in Brazil.
This is a phase II, single-arm, multicenter trial, conducted through Latin American Coorperative Oncology Group (LACOG). Treatment-naïve patients with recurrent/metastatic NSCLCs harboring EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R point mutations will be enrolled. At baseline, an archival or (optional) new tissue sample will be obtained for biomarker evaluation, as well as liquid biopsies. Treatment will continue until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
This study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab/vibostolimab (MK-7684A) in combination with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) followed by pembrolizumab/vibostolimab versus cCRT followed by durvalumab in participants with unresectable, locally advanced, stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). The primary hypotheses are that pembrolizumab/vibostolimab with cCRT followed by pembrolizumab/vibostolimab is superior to cCRT followed by durvalumab with respect to the following: - progression free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR) in participants with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥1% and PD-L1 all comer participants. - overall survival (OS) in participants with PD-L1 TPS ≥1% and PD-L1 all comer participants.
Tooth whitening is a procedure that has been increasingly requested by patients around the world, whether at home or in office bleaching. Tooth sensitivity is the main side effect of bleaching. It have a great power to interfere negatively in the quality of life of those affected. According to the literature, about 51% of people who had at-home bleaching developed postoperative sensitivity. The objective of this clinical, randomized, double-blind study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the association of casein phosphopeptides-fluoridated amorphous calcium phosphate with photobiomodulation in the treatment of tooth sensitivity after home bleaching, with 22% carbamide peroxide and also evaluate the effectiveness of at home bleaching through color analysis. For develop this study, 50 patients will be selected, with no previous history of sensitivity, aged between 18 and 30 years. They will be divided into four treatment groups: PLACEBO group; CPP-ACPF group; LASER group; LASER+CPP-ACPF group. Home bleaching treatment will use 22% carbamide peroxide. Patients should use two hours a day for 21 days. The desensitizing treatments will be applied in four moments, according to the group of each patient: before starting the bleaching treatment; after one week of the bleaching treatment; after two weeks of whitening treatment and after three weeks of whitening treatment. Sensitivity will be assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS), where patients should daily mark their pain level (from 0 to 10) on each side of the arcade. After the 21 days of treatment, they will receive a new VAS, to evaluate if was any sensitivity will occur during 30 days after the bleaching treatment. In parallel with bleaching treatment and sensitivity treatment, the color analysis of teeth 13, 11, 21 and 23 will be performed, with the Vita Easyshade Advance 4.0 spectrophotometer, to monitor the bleaching performance, in each week. The first one will occur before starting the bleaching treatment (baseline) and a new measurement will be performed every week, together with the application of treatments for sensitivity. The collected data will be tabulated in an Excel Microsoft Windows 2010) spreadsheet and analyzed in the Jamovi 1.6.23 (The Jamovi Project, 2020) software. For inter- and intra-group analysis of sensitivity values, the Repeated Measures statistical test will probably be used. For all statistical analyses, a significance level of 5% will be adopted.
This Phase III, randomized, two-arm, open-label, multicenter study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of giredestrant plus Phesgo compared with Phesgo after induction therapy with Phesgo plus taxane in participants with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive advanced breast cancer (metastatic or locally advanced disease not amenable to curative treatment) who have not previously received a systemic non-hormonal anti-cancer therapy in the advanced setting.
COVID-19 is an infectious disease which presents a heterogenous clinical presentation. Recent investigations suggest that people who were infected by COVID-19 often develop physical disabilities (i.e. pain, fatigue) and neurological complications after hospital discharge. Many therapeutic approaches such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have been proposed to minimize functional and structural impairments. Electroencephalogram (EEG) has been used in this population to assess electrophysiological changes in the brain. However, evidences about EEG utilization as efficacy predictor of tDCS in COVID-19 people rest inconclusive.Our objective is to evaluate EEG as neurobiological predictor marker of tDCS efficacy on fatigue, pain, quality of life, self-efficacy and functional capacity in the chronic phase of COVID-19.