View clinical trials related to Chronic Pain.
Filter by:Given the lack of studies in the literature associating the use of acupuncture and sliding suction cup in patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis, the objective of this study is to evaluate the benefits of this association in patients of the Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology outpatient clinic of the University of São Paulo while awaiting surgical treatment of knee osteoarthritis as a method of pain relief, limb function improvement and quality of life.
This study evaluates the use of a health-related quality of life report based on the SPADE cluster (sleep disturbance, pain interference with activities, anxiety, depression, and low energy/fatigue) derived from the PROMIS-29 instrument in patients with chronic low back pain. Half of the participants will receive the report, while the other half will not.
This study emphasizes the importance of rehabilitation in breast cancer survivors after mastectomy, even during the course of radiotherapy and chemotherapy, both for good efficacy in reducing pain and for functional recovery of the upper limb. Authors designed a randomized-controlled trial to compare two different rehabilitation protocols: the single rehabilitative treatment (ST) and the group treatment (GT). The study is the first attempt to measure the reaching movement after BC surgery with an optoelectronic evaluation system previously standardized in the neurological field during rehabilitation treatment.
The objective of this observational, prospective study is to evaluate the incidence of chronic pain at 3 months after ICU discharge in patients with a prolonged ICU stay (i.e. ≥3 days). Investigators will assess the proportion of patients with chronic pain (defined according to the Brief Pain Inventory questionnaire), by interview at 3 months after ICU discharge. All data potentially associated with chronic pain will be collected, including the type of surgery, the acute pain (intensity and duration) during the ICU stay, the type and dose of opioids received, patients comorbidity... Patients will be follow-up at 6 and 12 months to identify impact on quality of life.
Each year, an estimated 34,000 individuals undergo epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) surgery to address debilitating chronic low back and leg pain (CLBLP). Although the commercial application of SCS to treat CLBLP was approved by the FDA in 1989, only in the past decade have significant advancements in stimulator technology been introduced. For instance, traditional SCS devices achieved reduction in pain using a type of stimulation known as low-frequency tonic stimulation (LFTS, below 100 Hz), which was dependent on induction of paresthesias (i.e., a tingling sensation) over the areas of pain perception. However, investigators now know that LFTS compromises sensory information flowing back to the spinal cord, which can be important in other spinal cord functions such as proprioception and movement. On the other hand, recent innovations in stimulator technology now provide the capability to apply stimulation frequencies up to 10,000 Hz along with complex waveform patterns - known as high frequency burst stimulation or HFBS - that can mitigate pain perception without the induction of paresthesias and the negative consequences on proprioception and movement. We propose to study the effects of these recently introduced features in SCS technology on motor and sensory spinal thresholds, proprioception and movement in subjects with CLBLP. The spinal cord relies on input from the motor cortex and surrounding extremities to initiate specific muscle recruitment, and recent evidence suggests that preservation of temporally specific proprioceptive information via dorsal column primary afferent fibers is critical for natural motor behaviors such as ambulation. Since the spinal cord is exposed during the placement of the SCS device, information about a subject's motor and sensory spinal pathways can be easily obtained during the regular course of the procedure and compared to proprioceptive and motor responses once the subject is awake and moving with the device turned on. Our lab specializes in electrophysiological recordings in subjects undergoing spinal cord stimulator (SCS) implantation for CLBLP, while MUSC's Locomotion Laboratory specializes in quantifying proprioception and movement in human subjects. In this proposal, investigators will apply these techniques to subjects with CLBLP to determine effects of spinal neuromodulation on motor and sensory thresholds, proprioception, and kinematics.
Effective control of chronic pain is a top priority in the United States, as approximately 10% of adults have severe chronic pain most of which is chronic lower back pain (CLBP). However, despite the advances in neuroscience over the past 20 years, chronic pain is largely treated with opiate narcotics, much as was done in the Civil War. In addition to their high abuse liability and dependence potential, only 30 40% of chronic pain patients declare they receive satisfactory (>50%) relief from their pain through pharmacological treatment. In these patients a common clinical practice is to escalate the dose of opiates as tolerance develops which unfortunately has contributed to escalation in opiate overdose deaths, a resurgence of intravenous heroin use, and $55 billion in societal costs. Consequently, there is a critical need for new treatments that can treat pain and reduce reliance on opiates in individuals with chronic pain. The proposed study will be the first to employ a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled design to parametrically evaluate the longitudinal effects of 16 days of Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the primary motor cortex (MC) or the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) on self-reported pain and the brain s response to pain. This will be done in a cohort of patients recruited from the community as well as Wake Forest Baptist Health (WFBH) clinics with chronic lower back pain that have not been able to find adequate pain relief, whether or not they are using prescription opiates for 3 or more months. Participants will be randomized to receive rTMS to the MC, MPFC, or sham (50% at each site), using a Latin square randomization. Resting state connectivity will be collected 3 times: before the 1st day of TMS, after the 12th day of TMS, and before the 16th day of TMS (the last day administered).
A Phase 1 double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized single ascending dose incorporating an open-label, 2-period crossover, food effect cohort.
The hypothesis behind our study was that patients after BC surgery, who underwent quadrantectomy or mastectomy, may present a different disability respect to the upper limb on the operated side. Accordingly they could have a different functional recovery patterns after rehabilitation. The aim of our study was to compare the recovery of the fluidity of the reaching movement (Jerk) as the primary outcome, the reduction of shoulder pain and improvement of disability for the upper limb respect the operated side as secondary outcomes, before and after a specific rehabilitation protocol treatment.
Objectives: (1) To analyze the effectiveness of adding a group-based form of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) or a behavioural activation program for depression (TACD) to the treatment as usual (TAU) for patients diagnosed of chronic pain and comorbid mild-moderate major depression; (2) To examine the cost-utility of these psychological treatments from healthcare and societal perspectives; (3) To measure a set of biomarkers alongside the RCT in order to know the physiological underpinnings of these psychological therapies and to identify potential predictors of treatment response. Methodology: 12-month multisite, randomised, controlled trial (RCT) Centres: Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu (St. Boi de Llobregat) and Hospital del Mar (Barcelona). Participants. 225 adult patients with chronic pain that meet the diagnostic criteria for mild-moderate major depression will be randomly assigned to one of the three study arms: TAU + ACT vs. TAU + TACD vs. TAU. Primary outcome: Quality of life. Secondary outcomes: pain intensity, depression severity, anxiety symptoms, pain catastrophising, and pain acceptance. Costs to the healthcare system and to society and quality adjusted life years (QALYs). In addition, the empirically validated app Multicenter Pain Monitor® will be used to monitor participants alongside the treatments (ecological momentary assessment). Biomarkers: hair cortisol and cortisone, corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG), ACTH and cortisol in plasma, and genotyping of 5 polymorphisms in the FKBP5 gene involved in the regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity, cytokines, Th1: IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α; cytokines Th2: IL-10 + hsCRP test, and vitamin D levels. Main statistical analyses: Intention-to-Treat analyses that will include all participants who undergo random allocation, using multiple imputation to replace missing values. Linear mixed-effects models will be performed using Restricted Maximum Likelihood to estimate the parameters. Calculation of between-groups effect sizes using Cohen's d and of the number-needed-to-treat. Economic evaluation: cost-utility ratios evaluated by applying bootstrapping techniques, acceptability curves, and sensitivity analyses.
EaseVRx, a software-based virtual reality (VR) medical device, is intended to offer users a prescription pain management tool that manages the symptoms associated with chronic pain and reduces or eliminates the risk of opioid dependence. The investigators will conduct a proof-of-concept randomized study to assess the feasibility and efficacy of using EaseVRx as a 56-day, VR-based, at-home program among 100 chronic low back pain patients by gathering pilot data on the efficacy of the intervention in decreasing pain, reducing opioid/non-opioid pharmacotherapy, and improving pain-related quality of life.