View clinical trials related to Chronic Pain.
Filter by:This observational, prospective data collection is designed to evaluate the effectiveness and stimulation coverage of closed-loop spinal cord stimulation (CL-SCS) therapy in patients with cervical lead placement.
Chronic pain impacts about 20% of US Adults. Though non-pharmacologic, integrative pain management therapies are now considered first-line treatment by clinical guidelines, these therapies are still rarely covered by health insurance and therefore inaccessible to lower-income individuals. The Integrative Medical Group Visit (IMGV) program was developed to offer low-income, diverse patients with chronic pain an introduction to integrative pain management approaches, through a model that is covered by health insurance under existing billing codes. An initial pragmatic randomized control trial found that IMGV led to significant improvement in mental health related quality of life and lower use of high-cost care. However, there has been little research investigating the implementation of IMGV, and none in Federally-Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), where the program was initially designed to be implemented. In this study, the investigators test strategies to implement IMGV in FQHCs, including training and coaching clinic staff, and measure the effectiveness of the IMGV on health outcomes for patients with chronic pain.
The overall goal of this multisite pilot trial is to pilot test and refine recruitment, intervention, and data collection protocols at four VA study sites, in preparation for a larger-scale clinical trial.
This is a research study to evaluate the effectiveness of daily supplementation with Root.Health, a plant-based dietary supplement, on reducing levels of 11 abnormal urine biomarkers associated with chronic pain. Biomarkers are molecules found in blood, tissues, or other body fluids (such as urine) that indicate normal or abnormal processes.
The exploratory project aims to investigate the presence of pain as a long Covid-19 symptom in previously hospitalised patients and in non-hospitalised persons previously tested positive in a PCR test.
Mindfulness is a popular set of knowledge and practical techniques that can help people cope with stress. It includes meditation practices, everyday small practices to break and change usual habits, as well as understanding and developing competencies to be more aware of thoughts, emotions and physical sensations. Mindfulness can help not to excessively react to them, or becoming distressed by these, as well as pain. In persistent pain (pain that lasts more than three months), mindfulness is thought to improve depression, quality of life, and even how sore people feel. There are numerous versions of mindfulness and mindfulness-based therapies. One approach, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), is based on science (as opposed to religion or common sense). ACT helps people to learn about and apply skills to cope with thoughts, emotions and sensations without getting upset, distracted or impeded by them. It also assists people to develop the ability to set clear goals that matter in their life. ACT evaluates successful outcomes in this areas (called 'processes') and how these link to changes in pain, mood and stress. However, more puritan mindfulness courses tend to only focus on the latter. Research on mindfulness courses for chronic pain, can show that people improve, but not so well what changes in people's experience and skills, or how such skills are applied. The investigators also know that pain sufferers who attend mindfulness courses for stress, may say it is not so relevant to their pain difficulties. In this study the investigators want to explore how both mindfulness for stress and mindfulness for pain courses, online, contribute to: - How specific areas of ACT and other mindfulness learning change - If/how these link with practical skills and any emotional or improvements in the participants' quality of life, use of medication or GP visits. - If/how the above correlate with physiological stress responses such a heart rate variability To help us evaluate this, the investigators will ask participants to complete scientifically accepted questionnaires and interview a proportion of participants. Some may be invited to wear portable heart rate monitors. The investigators will then use statistical methods and qualitative methods to evaluate change. This may help us with better supporting chronic pain sufferers with choices around mindfulness as a standalone or as part of attending intensive pain-coping programmes involving different professions.
Neck pain is an important public health problem with a high lifetime prevalence and frequently occurring in all industrialized countries. Clinical practice guidelines for chronic neck pain recommend conservative management. Conservative treatment includes many approaches such as endurance, stretching and strengthening exercises, manual therapy, proprioceptive exercises, pilates and yoga. In patients with chronic neck pain, atrophy of deep neck muscles, deterioration in fiber type ratio, muscle tenderness and decreased range of motion are observed. These problems cause poor cervical postural control system and thus impaired sense of proprioception, loss of balance, decreased eye movement and cervical muscle activity. Sensorimotor control of upright posture and head-eye movement relies on information from the vestibular, visual, and proprioceptive systems that assemble throughout the central nervous system.The cervical spine has an important role in providing proprioceptive input. This role is associated with an abundance of cervical mechanoreceptors. Recent studies have shown that proprioceptive training is associated with cervical joint position sense, joint range of motion, pain and disability. Also yoga combines physical exercises with breathing techniques and meditation and yoga is one of the most commonly used complementary treatments for neck pain.The aim of study is to determine the effectiveness of exercises for sensorimotor structure and yoga exercises with physical and meditative effects in individuals with chronic neck pain.
This observational study will collect prospectively specified data on patient characteristics and clinically relevant outcomes in patients who receive a ketamine infusion at Stanford Pain Management Center for the treatment of chronic pain, with the goal of identifying treatment responders and relationships between patient characteristics and treatment response.
Biological, psychological, and social factors all influence a child's sense of pain. Pain beliefs can have a significant impact on a person's perception of pain and adherence to treatment. As a result, pain management requires a thorough examination of the factors that influence pain perception. Coping is a cognitive and behavioral response to conditions and threats based on by personal or environmental factors. Children who do not have adequate coping mechanisms suffer from more severe pain. As a result, dealing with pain is a crucial part of pain management. This highlights the need of assessing pain coping in children when treating chronic pain. The purpose of this study is to show that the Turkish version of the Pain Coping Questionnaire (PCQ), which assesses children's pain coping techniques, is valid and reliable, as well as to ensure that it is culturally appropriate.
Background: Chronic pain and negative consequences of long-term opioid therapy are related public health concerns associated with significant functional impairment, high psychiatric comorbidity, and premature mortality, particularly among Veterans. Clinical Practice Guidelines for opioid prescribing and pain management recommend using non-pharmacological approaches as first-line treatments. Psychosocial interventions (e.g., cognitive-behavioral therapy) have strong evidence supporting their ability to improve pain outcomes. Patient beliefs about the stigma associated with psychological interventions, opioid analgesics, ability of psychosocial intervention to improve pain among others can greatly interfere with the patients' ability to initiate and maintain engagement in psychosocial interventions and other non-pharmacological approaches. Significance/Impact: Without a concerted effort at affecting beliefs that impede engagement in treatment, Veterans who may benefit from the treatment, will not receive it. This can result in continued risk for negative consequences associated with long-term opioid therapy and inadequate pain management. Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Treatment Seeking (CBT-TS) is an evidence-based intervention that directly intervenes on beliefs that act as barriers to treatment initiation and retention. By intervening on these beliefs, this study has the potential to improve engagement in psychosocial pain interventions and other non-pharmacological pain treatments, which will improve pain-related interference and functioning and reduce reliance on opioid analgesics. This study addresses VHA/VA Veteran care priorities including opioid use, pain management, and access and directly addresses priorities of the HSR&D Targeted Solicitation for Service Directed Research on Opioid Safety and Opioid Use Disorder. Innovation: The proposed study is the first application of CBT-TS for Veterans with chronic pain who are receiving opioid analgesics-a notably high-risk, treatment-resistant population. This is the first study to directly intervene on thoughts about psychosocial interventions. Specific Aims: The specific aims are to: test the effects of CBT-TS to increase initiation of psychosocial interventions for pain among Veterans receiving opioid analgesics for chronic pain (Aim 1), test the effects of CBT-TS to increase the retention in psychosocial interventions for pain among Veterans receiving opioid analgesics for chronic pain (Aim 2), and evaluate the effects of CBT-TS in improving pain and substance use outcomes among Veterans receiving opioid analgesics for chronic pain (Aim 3). The investigators will also test the effects of CBT-TS on the initiation of and retention to other non-pharmacological pain treatments (Exploratory Aim). Methodology: Participants (N = 300) will be randomized to either the CBT-TS condition or an education control condition. Participants in both conditions will complete assessments on pain, treatment engagement, and opioid use at baseline, and 1-, 3-, and 6-months post-treatment to assess primary, secondary, and exploratory outcomes. Implementation/Next Steps: Results from this study will provide critical information on increasing engagement of psychosocial interventions for pain, which can be used to inform future implementation and dissemination efforts. The research team will work with the VHA National Pain Management and Opioid Safety office and the VHA Office of Patient Centered Care & Cultural Transformation to identify implementation and dissemination efforts. CBT-TS is undergoing current implementation research to increase mental health functioning and this effort could be expanded to also increase treatment engagement of psychosocial interventions for pain and other non-pharmacological pain treatments.