View clinical trials related to Acute Coronary Syndrome.
Filter by:Objectives: Evaluate differences for mortality, morbidity and the cardiovascular risk factors between HIV and non-HIV patients with an acute coronary syndromes (ACS) after a 3-years follow up.
Study Objectives PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether fondaparinux is at least as effective as or superior to enoxaparin in preventing death, myocardial infarction or refactory ischemia up to Day 9 in the acute treatment of patients with unstable angina/non ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction concurrently managed with standard medical therapy. SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: If non inferiority of fondaparinux is established on initial statistical analysis in a second step, superiority of fondaparinux to enoxaparin will be evaluated statistically. - To determine whether fondaparinux is superior to enoxaparin in reducing death or MI at Day 9 - To determine whether fondaparinux is superior to enoxaparin in reducing major bleeding events up to Day 9 - To determine whether the relative effect on the primary end point of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin is sustained at Day 14, Day 30, Day 90 and Day 180 Study Drug: Patients will be randomized to receive either: - Fondaparinux 2.5 mg once and placebo-enoxaparin twice daily by subcutaneous injection or - Enoxaparin (1mg/kg) twice and fondaparinux-placebo once daily by subcutaneous injection Duration of Therapy: - Fondaparinux 2.5mg daily for 8 days or hospital discharge (whichever is earlier) - Enoxaparin 1mg/kg b.i.d. x 2-8 days or until clinically stable. - Patients should receive an ASA and all other standard medical therapies. Substudy: - A substudy comparing routine early coronary angiography immediately or as soon as possible (but no later than 24 hours after randomization) and intervention versus delayed (>48 hrs) coronary angiography and intervention. Primary Outcome: The first occurence of any component of the following composite up to Day 9: - Death - Myocardial Infarction - Refractory Ischemia
The primary focus of this study is to explore the safety of a range of doses of rNAPc2 in subjects who are managed in hospitals that most typically practice an early invasive strategy (catheterization during the index admission). After completion of the ascending dose-ranging part of the trial and review of these data by the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB), the maximum tolerated dose of rNAPc2 will be studied in single-arm, open-label panels (approximately 25 subjects each) of rNAPc2 with descending doses of unfractionated heparin (UFH).
MERLIN-TIMI 36 is a multi-national, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ranolazine during acute and long-term treatment in approximately 5,500 patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS) treated with standard therapy. The primary efficacy endpoint in MERLIN-TIMI 36 is time to first occurrence of any element of the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or recurrent ischemia in patients with non-ST elevation ACS receiving standard therapy. The study also evaluates the safety of long-term treatment with ranolazine compared to placebo.
The sponsors of this investigational drug are developing prasugrel (also known as CS-747) as a possible treatment for patients with acute coronary syndrome (heart attack or chest pain) who need, or are expected to need, a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; also called a balloon angioplasty). Prasugrel was compared with Clopidogrel to determine which drug is better at reducing deaths, future heart attacks, or stroke.
The purpose of this study is to show that, when compared with heparin (enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin) and routine GPIIb/IIIa inhibition (either started upfront or at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]; Arm A): 1. Bivalirudin with routine GPIIb/IIIa inhibition (either started upfront or at the time of PCI; Arm B) provides non-inferior or superior overall clinical outcomes and 2. Bivalirudin alone (Arm C) reduces clinically significant bleeding. An important secondary objective for this comparison is to show that bivalirudin is not inferior for ischemic complications.
The purpose of this study is to see if early INTEGRILIN® (eptifibatide) therapy in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS) reduces the occurence of death, heart attack and urgent cardiac intervention (surgery) compared to placebo (with delayed provisional use of eptifibatide).
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of enoxaparin compared to unfractionated heparin (UFH) for patients diagnosed with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) in the emergency department (ED). Efficacy is assessed by using a composite score consisting of 30-day all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) and recurrent angina requiring revascularization.
Patients experiencing a mild heart attack will receive one of two medications which thin the blood to discern which is superior.